The Case for the Inexperienced User

Rethinking Filter Questions in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys

Janet M. Kelly, David Swindell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most citizen satisfaction surveys use filter questions to limit satisfaction responses to only those citizens with direct, personal experience with the service. The resulting small response set is inherently problematic, but no more so than the loss of valuable data on the expectations of service satisfaction from citizens who do not use the service. Borrowing a theoretical framework from the consumer satisfaction literature, this article identifies differences in the mean service satisfaction between inexperienced and experienced users of four common local government services (police, fire, emergency medical, and parks). The authors conclude that both experienced and inexperienced users have important information about service quality for local policy makers, especially when the satisfaction results can be disaggregated by neighborhood. Recommendations for modifying common citizen survey practice follow from the findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-108
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

citizen
information service
Filter
police
Service satisfaction
experience
Information services
Politicians
Emergency
Police
Theoretical framework
Local government
Borrowing
Service quality
Consumer satisfaction
Government services

Keywords

  • Citizen survey
  • Service quality
  • Service user attitudes
  • Survey filter questions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

The Case for the Inexperienced User : Rethinking Filter Questions in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys. / Kelly, Janet M.; Swindell, David.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 33, No. 1, 03.2003, p. 91-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9808c7b4dc864f1b98520212d662335f,
title = "The Case for the Inexperienced User: Rethinking Filter Questions in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys",
abstract = "Most citizen satisfaction surveys use filter questions to limit satisfaction responses to only those citizens with direct, personal experience with the service. The resulting small response set is inherently problematic, but no more so than the loss of valuable data on the expectations of service satisfaction from citizens who do not use the service. Borrowing a theoretical framework from the consumer satisfaction literature, this article identifies differences in the mean service satisfaction between inexperienced and experienced users of four common local government services (police, fire, emergency medical, and parks). The authors conclude that both experienced and inexperienced users have important information about service quality for local policy makers, especially when the satisfaction results can be disaggregated by neighborhood. Recommendations for modifying common citizen survey practice follow from the findings.",
keywords = "Citizen survey, Service quality, Service user attitudes, Survey filter questions",
author = "Kelly, {Janet M.} and David Swindell",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0275074002250256",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "91--108",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Case for the Inexperienced User

T2 - Rethinking Filter Questions in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys

AU - Kelly, Janet M.

AU - Swindell, David

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - Most citizen satisfaction surveys use filter questions to limit satisfaction responses to only those citizens with direct, personal experience with the service. The resulting small response set is inherently problematic, but no more so than the loss of valuable data on the expectations of service satisfaction from citizens who do not use the service. Borrowing a theoretical framework from the consumer satisfaction literature, this article identifies differences in the mean service satisfaction between inexperienced and experienced users of four common local government services (police, fire, emergency medical, and parks). The authors conclude that both experienced and inexperienced users have important information about service quality for local policy makers, especially when the satisfaction results can be disaggregated by neighborhood. Recommendations for modifying common citizen survey practice follow from the findings.

AB - Most citizen satisfaction surveys use filter questions to limit satisfaction responses to only those citizens with direct, personal experience with the service. The resulting small response set is inherently problematic, but no more so than the loss of valuable data on the expectations of service satisfaction from citizens who do not use the service. Borrowing a theoretical framework from the consumer satisfaction literature, this article identifies differences in the mean service satisfaction between inexperienced and experienced users of four common local government services (police, fire, emergency medical, and parks). The authors conclude that both experienced and inexperienced users have important information about service quality for local policy makers, especially when the satisfaction results can be disaggregated by neighborhood. Recommendations for modifying common citizen survey practice follow from the findings.

KW - Citizen survey

KW - Service quality

KW - Service user attitudes

KW - Survey filter questions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342483096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342483096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074002250256

DO - 10.1177/0275074002250256

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 91

EP - 108

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -