TY - JOUR
T1 - Review and assessment of an evidence-based professional development program to promote active learning pedagogical practices in the classroom
AU - Ross, Lydia
AU - Krause, Stephen J.
AU - Hjelmstad, Keith D.
AU - Judson, Eugene
AU - Mayled, Lindy Hamilton
AU - Culbertson, Robert J.
AU - Hjelmstad, Kara L.
AU - Hoyt, Sarah
AU - Glassmeyer, Kristi
N1 - Funding Information:
The context for this paper is a large-scale professional development program in a college of engineering at a large university in the southwestern United States. The program, now in its fifth and final year, was funded through the National Science Foundation’s Improving Undergraduate Science Education (IUSE) initiative. Overall, the JTFD professional development program aimed to increase faculty awareness and use of active learning or student-centered teaching practices in undergraduate engineering classrooms. This professional development program was focused on seven sub-disciplines in engineering: aerospace, biomedical, chemical, civil, construction, materials, and mechanical. The year-long professional development program provided information to faculty about educational research on teaching practices, ways to implement active learning strategies, and created a supportive environment for faculty to discuss their teaching practices in the classroom. In this paper, we detail the program structure/content, evaluation methodology, and present a summary of data analysis. We conclude by discussing key takeaways and lessons learned from the program. Learn more about the JTFD professional development program at www.engineereducation.org..
Funding Information:
The authors of this paper gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation for this project under Grant No. JTFDXXX.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/22
Y1 - 2020/6/22
N2 - A substantial body of prior research demonstrates the efficacy of active learning pedagogical practices. In particular, student-centered teaching strategies have been shown to promote greater levels of student engagement, achievement, and retention. Despite strong evidence in favor of student-centered teaching strategies, the majority of faculty continue to use the more traditional lecture format, or instructor-centered teaching practices, in their own classrooms. As such, there is a strong need for professional development to increase faculty awareness and use of active learning pedagogical practices. This complete research-based paper discusses a successful faculty development program designed to increase awareness and use of student-centered, or active learning, pedagogical practices amongst a multi-disciplinary group of engineering faculty. The JTFD professional development program was a multi-disciplinary program at a large southwestern university in the United States and was funded through NSF's Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE). Following a train-the-trainer model, the professional development program involved multiple cohorts across seven engineering disciplines. In their first year in the program, faculty (n=82) participated in a series of 8 biweekly workshops over the fall semester and 6 communities of practice (CoP) sessions in the spring semester. Topics discussed during the workshops and CoP sessions included active learning, cooperation, student motivation, Bloom's taxonomy, and inclusive teaching practices. In the second year of the program, faculty participated in eight continuing communities of practice sessions. A detailed discussion of program results will be presented in the final paper. Key highlights include a significant increase, 13%, in faculty use of active learning strategies after participating in the program. All participants reported that the program was a valuable use of their time and that they would recommend this program to a colleague. This paper describes the program structure, best practices for managing professional development programs, evaluation framework and strategy, major program results, and concludes with a discussion of key takeaways for moving forward.
AB - A substantial body of prior research demonstrates the efficacy of active learning pedagogical practices. In particular, student-centered teaching strategies have been shown to promote greater levels of student engagement, achievement, and retention. Despite strong evidence in favor of student-centered teaching strategies, the majority of faculty continue to use the more traditional lecture format, or instructor-centered teaching practices, in their own classrooms. As such, there is a strong need for professional development to increase faculty awareness and use of active learning pedagogical practices. This complete research-based paper discusses a successful faculty development program designed to increase awareness and use of student-centered, or active learning, pedagogical practices amongst a multi-disciplinary group of engineering faculty. The JTFD professional development program was a multi-disciplinary program at a large southwestern university in the United States and was funded through NSF's Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE). Following a train-the-trainer model, the professional development program involved multiple cohorts across seven engineering disciplines. In their first year in the program, faculty (n=82) participated in a series of 8 biweekly workshops over the fall semester and 6 communities of practice (CoP) sessions in the spring semester. Topics discussed during the workshops and CoP sessions included active learning, cooperation, student motivation, Bloom's taxonomy, and inclusive teaching practices. In the second year of the program, faculty participated in eight continuing communities of practice sessions. A detailed discussion of program results will be presented in the final paper. Key highlights include a significant increase, 13%, in faculty use of active learning strategies after participating in the program. All participants reported that the program was a valuable use of their time and that they would recommend this program to a colleague. This paper describes the program structure, best practices for managing professional development programs, evaluation framework and strategy, major program results, and concludes with a discussion of key takeaways for moving forward.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095751681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095751681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85095751681
SN - 2153-5965
VL - 2020-June
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
M1 - 1205
T2 - 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2020
Y2 - 22 June 2020 through 26 June 2020
ER -