Abstract

Many of us trust our students to conduct a good portion of our research. Our students collect the data, collate the data, score the data, and often analyze the data. We remain as vigilant as possible to potential problems-errors can occur at any point along the way. We watch out for outliers, data entry errors, errors in the analyses, and so on, because mistakes happen. Honest mistakes and errors occur in every experiment; we’re used to it. But it rarely occurs to us that the data themselves are not real; our trust in our students overwhelms the possibility that the data may be faked. Yet, this is what happened to me early on in my career. My student (I’ll call her Jane) was completing her Master’s thesis. I’d recently been inspired to examine the effects of text cohesion with younger readers. Several studies had demonstrated the importance of increasing cohesion for low-knowledge adolescent and adult readers, pointing to the potential importance of cohesion for younger emerging readers. I set out on the quest to investigate this question with Jane. She was very excited about the project and decided to conduct the study for her thesis project. We decided to focus on children in approximately the second grade. We collected second grade books. We chose our passages. We developed the highand low-cohesion versions. We constructed the comprehension questions and chose the individual difference assessments. Jane completed and defended her thesis proposal; we were all set to run the study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEthical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages119-120
Number of pages2
ISBN (Print)9781139626491, 9781107039735
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Students
Individuality
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

McNamara, D. (2015). Data not to trust. In Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences (pp. 119-120). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781139626491.040

Data not to trust. / McNamara, Danielle.

Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 119-120.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

McNamara, D 2015, Data not to trust. in Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp. 119-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781139626491.040
McNamara D. Data not to trust. In Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 119-120 https://doi.org/10.1007/9781139626491.040
McNamara, Danielle. / Data not to trust. Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 119-120
@inbook{f5df5093d3ed4bf0a9576ef1b47b68a0,
title = "Data not to trust",
abstract = "Many of us trust our students to conduct a good portion of our research. Our students collect the data, collate the data, score the data, and often analyze the data. We remain as vigilant as possible to potential problems-errors can occur at any point along the way. We watch out for outliers, data entry errors, errors in the analyses, and so on, because mistakes happen. Honest mistakes and errors occur in every experiment; we’re used to it. But it rarely occurs to us that the data themselves are not real; our trust in our students overwhelms the possibility that the data may be faked. Yet, this is what happened to me early on in my career. My student (I’ll call her Jane) was completing her Master’s thesis. I’d recently been inspired to examine the effects of text cohesion with younger readers. Several studies had demonstrated the importance of increasing cohesion for low-knowledge adolescent and adult readers, pointing to the potential importance of cohesion for younger emerging readers. I set out on the quest to investigate this question with Jane. She was very excited about the project and decided to conduct the study for her thesis project. We decided to focus on children in approximately the second grade. We collected second grade books. We chose our passages. We developed the highand low-cohesion versions. We constructed the comprehension questions and chose the individual difference assessments. Jane completed and defended her thesis proposal; we were all set to run the study.",
author = "Danielle McNamara",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/9781139626491.040",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781139626491",
pages = "119--120",
booktitle = "Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Data not to trust

AU - McNamara, Danielle

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Many of us trust our students to conduct a good portion of our research. Our students collect the data, collate the data, score the data, and often analyze the data. We remain as vigilant as possible to potential problems-errors can occur at any point along the way. We watch out for outliers, data entry errors, errors in the analyses, and so on, because mistakes happen. Honest mistakes and errors occur in every experiment; we’re used to it. But it rarely occurs to us that the data themselves are not real; our trust in our students overwhelms the possibility that the data may be faked. Yet, this is what happened to me early on in my career. My student (I’ll call her Jane) was completing her Master’s thesis. I’d recently been inspired to examine the effects of text cohesion with younger readers. Several studies had demonstrated the importance of increasing cohesion for low-knowledge adolescent and adult readers, pointing to the potential importance of cohesion for younger emerging readers. I set out on the quest to investigate this question with Jane. She was very excited about the project and decided to conduct the study for her thesis project. We decided to focus on children in approximately the second grade. We collected second grade books. We chose our passages. We developed the highand low-cohesion versions. We constructed the comprehension questions and chose the individual difference assessments. Jane completed and defended her thesis proposal; we were all set to run the study.

AB - Many of us trust our students to conduct a good portion of our research. Our students collect the data, collate the data, score the data, and often analyze the data. We remain as vigilant as possible to potential problems-errors can occur at any point along the way. We watch out for outliers, data entry errors, errors in the analyses, and so on, because mistakes happen. Honest mistakes and errors occur in every experiment; we’re used to it. But it rarely occurs to us that the data themselves are not real; our trust in our students overwhelms the possibility that the data may be faked. Yet, this is what happened to me early on in my career. My student (I’ll call her Jane) was completing her Master’s thesis. I’d recently been inspired to examine the effects of text cohesion with younger readers. Several studies had demonstrated the importance of increasing cohesion for low-knowledge adolescent and adult readers, pointing to the potential importance of cohesion for younger emerging readers. I set out on the quest to investigate this question with Jane. She was very excited about the project and decided to conduct the study for her thesis project. We decided to focus on children in approximately the second grade. We collected second grade books. We chose our passages. We developed the highand low-cohesion versions. We constructed the comprehension questions and chose the individual difference assessments. Jane completed and defended her thesis proposal; we were all set to run the study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952845558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952845558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/9781139626491.040

DO - 10.1007/9781139626491.040

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781139626491

SN - 9781107039735

SP - 119

EP - 120

BT - Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -