X-ray hardness variations as an internal/external shock diagnostic

Nathaniel Butler, Daniel Kocevski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The early, highly time-variable X-ray emission immediately following gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibits strong spectral variations that are unlike the temporally smoother emission that dominates after t ∼ 103 s. The ratio of hardchannel (1.3-10.0 keV) to soft-channel (0.3-1.3 keV) counts in the Swift X-ray telescope provides a new measure delineating the end time of this emission. We define TH as the time at which this transition takes place and measure for 59 events a range of transition times that spans 10 2 to 104 s, on average 5 times longer than the prompt T90 duration observed in the gamma-ray band. It is very likely that the mysterious light-curve plateau phase and the later powerlaw temporal evolution, both of which typically occur at times greater than TH and hence exhibit very little hardness ratio evolution, are both produced by external shocking of the surrounding medium and not by the internal shocks thought responsible for the earlier emission. We use the apparent lack of spectral evolution to discriminate among proposed models for the plateau phase emission. We favor energy injection scenarios with a roughly linearly increasing input energy versus time for six well-sampled events with nearly flat light curves at t ≈ 103 -104 s. Also, using the transition time TH as the delineation between the GRB and afterglow emission, we calculate that the kinetic energy in the afterglow shock is typically a factor of 10 lower than that released in the GRB. Three very bright events suggest that this presents a missing X-ray flux problem rather than an efficiency problem for the conversion of kinetic energy into the GRB. Lack of hardness variations in these three events may be due to a very highly relativistic outflow or due to a very dense circumburst medium. There are a handful of rare cases of very late time t > 104 s hardness evolution, which may point to residual central engine activity at very late time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-408
Number of pages9
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume668
Issue number1 I
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

hardness
shock
gamma ray bursts
x rays
kinetic energy
afterglows
light curve
plateaus
plateau
delineation
temporal evolution
energy
engine
outflow
engines
gamma rays
telescopes
injection

Keywords

  • Gamma rays: bursts
  • Supernovae: general
  • X-rays: general

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

X-ray hardness variations as an internal/external shock diagnostic. / Butler, Nathaniel; Kocevski, Daniel.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 668, No. 1 I, 2007, p. 400-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f185c48b48824b269da54bb47b127ff8,
title = "X-ray hardness variations as an internal/external shock diagnostic",
abstract = "The early, highly time-variable X-ray emission immediately following gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibits strong spectral variations that are unlike the temporally smoother emission that dominates after t ∼ 103 s. The ratio of hardchannel (1.3-10.0 keV) to soft-channel (0.3-1.3 keV) counts in the Swift X-ray telescope provides a new measure delineating the end time of this emission. We define TH as the time at which this transition takes place and measure for 59 events a range of transition times that spans 10 2 to 104 s, on average 5 times longer than the prompt T90 duration observed in the gamma-ray band. It is very likely that the mysterious light-curve plateau phase and the later powerlaw temporal evolution, both of which typically occur at times greater than TH and hence exhibit very little hardness ratio evolution, are both produced by external shocking of the surrounding medium and not by the internal shocks thought responsible for the earlier emission. We use the apparent lack of spectral evolution to discriminate among proposed models for the plateau phase emission. We favor energy injection scenarios with a roughly linearly increasing input energy versus time for six well-sampled events with nearly flat light curves at t ≈ 103 -104 s. Also, using the transition time TH as the delineation between the GRB and afterglow emission, we calculate that the kinetic energy in the afterglow shock is typically a factor of 10 lower than that released in the GRB. Three very bright events suggest that this presents a missing X-ray flux problem rather than an efficiency problem for the conversion of kinetic energy into the GRB. Lack of hardness variations in these three events may be due to a very highly relativistic outflow or due to a very dense circumburst medium. There are a handful of rare cases of very late time t > 104 s hardness evolution, which may point to residual central engine activity at very late time.",
keywords = "Gamma rays: bursts, Supernovae: general, X-rays: general",
author = "Nathaniel Butler and Daniel Kocevski",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1086/521072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "668",
pages = "400--408",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - X-ray hardness variations as an internal/external shock diagnostic

AU - Butler, Nathaniel

AU - Kocevski, Daniel

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The early, highly time-variable X-ray emission immediately following gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibits strong spectral variations that are unlike the temporally smoother emission that dominates after t ∼ 103 s. The ratio of hardchannel (1.3-10.0 keV) to soft-channel (0.3-1.3 keV) counts in the Swift X-ray telescope provides a new measure delineating the end time of this emission. We define TH as the time at which this transition takes place and measure for 59 events a range of transition times that spans 10 2 to 104 s, on average 5 times longer than the prompt T90 duration observed in the gamma-ray band. It is very likely that the mysterious light-curve plateau phase and the later powerlaw temporal evolution, both of which typically occur at times greater than TH and hence exhibit very little hardness ratio evolution, are both produced by external shocking of the surrounding medium and not by the internal shocks thought responsible for the earlier emission. We use the apparent lack of spectral evolution to discriminate among proposed models for the plateau phase emission. We favor energy injection scenarios with a roughly linearly increasing input energy versus time for six well-sampled events with nearly flat light curves at t ≈ 103 -104 s. Also, using the transition time TH as the delineation between the GRB and afterglow emission, we calculate that the kinetic energy in the afterglow shock is typically a factor of 10 lower than that released in the GRB. Three very bright events suggest that this presents a missing X-ray flux problem rather than an efficiency problem for the conversion of kinetic energy into the GRB. Lack of hardness variations in these three events may be due to a very highly relativistic outflow or due to a very dense circumburst medium. There are a handful of rare cases of very late time t > 104 s hardness evolution, which may point to residual central engine activity at very late time.

AB - The early, highly time-variable X-ray emission immediately following gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibits strong spectral variations that are unlike the temporally smoother emission that dominates after t ∼ 103 s. The ratio of hardchannel (1.3-10.0 keV) to soft-channel (0.3-1.3 keV) counts in the Swift X-ray telescope provides a new measure delineating the end time of this emission. We define TH as the time at which this transition takes place and measure for 59 events a range of transition times that spans 10 2 to 104 s, on average 5 times longer than the prompt T90 duration observed in the gamma-ray band. It is very likely that the mysterious light-curve plateau phase and the later powerlaw temporal evolution, both of which typically occur at times greater than TH and hence exhibit very little hardness ratio evolution, are both produced by external shocking of the surrounding medium and not by the internal shocks thought responsible for the earlier emission. We use the apparent lack of spectral evolution to discriminate among proposed models for the plateau phase emission. We favor energy injection scenarios with a roughly linearly increasing input energy versus time for six well-sampled events with nearly flat light curves at t ≈ 103 -104 s. Also, using the transition time TH as the delineation between the GRB and afterglow emission, we calculate that the kinetic energy in the afterglow shock is typically a factor of 10 lower than that released in the GRB. Three very bright events suggest that this presents a missing X-ray flux problem rather than an efficiency problem for the conversion of kinetic energy into the GRB. Lack of hardness variations in these three events may be due to a very highly relativistic outflow or due to a very dense circumburst medium. There are a handful of rare cases of very late time t > 104 s hardness evolution, which may point to residual central engine activity at very late time.

KW - Gamma rays: bursts

KW - Supernovae: general

KW - X-rays: general

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348892542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348892542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/521072

DO - 10.1086/521072

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:35348892542

VL - 668

SP - 400

EP - 408

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 1 I

ER -