Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training

Cassandra Gipson-Reichardt, Holly C. Miller, Jérôme J D Alessandri, Thomas R. Zentall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is evidence that pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that are preceded by greater effort over those that are preceded by less effort (an effect that has been attributed to within-trial contrast). In past research the probability of reinforcement for correct choice of the conditioned reinforcer has been 100%, however, the high level of reinforcement for both alternatives in training may result in a performance ceiling when choice between those alternatives is provided on test trials. In the present study we tested this hypothesis by including a group for which the probability of reinforcement in training was only 50%. Pigeons were trained on two simultaneous discriminations, one that was preceded by a 30 peck requirement the other by a single peck requirement. On test trials, we found a significant preference for the S+ that required the greater effort in training for pigeons trained with 100% and a small but nonsignificant effect for pigeons trained with 50% reinforcement. Although the hypothesis that the within-trial contrast effect was constrained by a performance ceiling was not confirmed, we did find a reliable within-trial contrast effect with 100% reinforcement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-132
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Columbidae
pigeons
testing
Research

Keywords

  • Partial reinforcement
  • Pigeons
  • Simultaneous discrimination
  • Within-trial contrast
  • Work ethic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Within-trial contrast : The effect of probability of reinforcement in training. / Gipson-Reichardt, Cassandra; Miller, Holly C.; Alessandri, Jérôme J D; Zentall, Thomas R.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 82, No. 2, 10.2009, p. 126-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gipson-Reichardt, Cassandra ; Miller, Holly C. ; Alessandri, Jérôme J D ; Zentall, Thomas R. / Within-trial contrast : The effect of probability of reinforcement in training. In: Behavioural Processes. 2009 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 126-132.
@article{cfdbdbf13b574744a9abaf495a17abcd,
title = "Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training",
abstract = "There is evidence that pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that are preceded by greater effort over those that are preceded by less effort (an effect that has been attributed to within-trial contrast). In past research the probability of reinforcement for correct choice of the conditioned reinforcer has been 100{\%}, however, the high level of reinforcement for both alternatives in training may result in a performance ceiling when choice between those alternatives is provided on test trials. In the present study we tested this hypothesis by including a group for which the probability of reinforcement in training was only 50{\%}. Pigeons were trained on two simultaneous discriminations, one that was preceded by a 30 peck requirement the other by a single peck requirement. On test trials, we found a significant preference for the S+ that required the greater effort in training for pigeons trained with 100{\%} and a small but nonsignificant effect for pigeons trained with 50{\%} reinforcement. Although the hypothesis that the within-trial contrast effect was constrained by a performance ceiling was not confirmed, we did find a reliable within-trial contrast effect with 100{\%} reinforcement.",
keywords = "Partial reinforcement, Pigeons, Simultaneous discrimination, Within-trial contrast, Work ethic",
author = "Cassandra Gipson-Reichardt and Miller, {Holly C.} and Alessandri, {J{\'e}r{\^o}me J D} and Zentall, {Thomas R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "126--132",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Within-trial contrast

T2 - The effect of probability of reinforcement in training

AU - Gipson-Reichardt, Cassandra

AU - Miller, Holly C.

AU - Alessandri, Jérôme J D

AU - Zentall, Thomas R.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - There is evidence that pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that are preceded by greater effort over those that are preceded by less effort (an effect that has been attributed to within-trial contrast). In past research the probability of reinforcement for correct choice of the conditioned reinforcer has been 100%, however, the high level of reinforcement for both alternatives in training may result in a performance ceiling when choice between those alternatives is provided on test trials. In the present study we tested this hypothesis by including a group for which the probability of reinforcement in training was only 50%. Pigeons were trained on two simultaneous discriminations, one that was preceded by a 30 peck requirement the other by a single peck requirement. On test trials, we found a significant preference for the S+ that required the greater effort in training for pigeons trained with 100% and a small but nonsignificant effect for pigeons trained with 50% reinforcement. Although the hypothesis that the within-trial contrast effect was constrained by a performance ceiling was not confirmed, we did find a reliable within-trial contrast effect with 100% reinforcement.

AB - There is evidence that pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that are preceded by greater effort over those that are preceded by less effort (an effect that has been attributed to within-trial contrast). In past research the probability of reinforcement for correct choice of the conditioned reinforcer has been 100%, however, the high level of reinforcement for both alternatives in training may result in a performance ceiling when choice between those alternatives is provided on test trials. In the present study we tested this hypothesis by including a group for which the probability of reinforcement in training was only 50%. Pigeons were trained on two simultaneous discriminations, one that was preceded by a 30 peck requirement the other by a single peck requirement. On test trials, we found a significant preference for the S+ that required the greater effort in training for pigeons trained with 100% and a small but nonsignificant effect for pigeons trained with 50% reinforcement. Although the hypothesis that the within-trial contrast effect was constrained by a performance ceiling was not confirmed, we did find a reliable within-trial contrast effect with 100% reinforcement.

KW - Partial reinforcement

KW - Pigeons

KW - Simultaneous discrimination

KW - Within-trial contrast

KW - Work ethic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68549083338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68549083338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.05.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 19607889

AN - SCOPUS:68549083338

VL - 82

SP - 126

EP - 132

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 2

ER -