Within-session practice effects in the jebsen hand function test (JHFT)

Sydney Schaefer, Ashley Saba, Jessica F. Baird, Melissa B. Kolar, Kevin Duff, Jill C. Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) is a standardized assessment that has been used as a clinical outcome measure. To appropriately interpret the effects of an intervention on hand function (as measured by the JHFT), the extent to which this instrument shows significant practice effects must be quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the JHFT is susceptible to within-session practice effects. The results showed that the dominant and nondominant hands significantly improved on the JHFT and many of its subtests over six consecutive trials. Although practice effects might complicate the interpretation of change due to intervention, we briefly relate our findings to emerging neuropsychological evidence that practice effects may indicate a person's motor learning potential or treatment responsiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Hand
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Within-session practice effects in the jebsen hand function test (JHFT). / Schaefer, Sydney; Saba, Ashley; Baird, Jessica F.; Kolar, Melissa B.; Duff, Kevin; Stewart, Jill C.

In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 72, No. 6, 01.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schaefer, Sydney ; Saba, Ashley ; Baird, Jessica F. ; Kolar, Melissa B. ; Duff, Kevin ; Stewart, Jill C. / Within-session practice effects in the jebsen hand function test (JHFT). In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2018 ; Vol. 72, No. 6.
@article{73bd54cc447f47a490b88592fa1fbe4c,
title = "Within-session practice effects in the jebsen hand function test (JHFT)",
abstract = "The Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) is a standardized assessment that has been used as a clinical outcome measure. To appropriately interpret the effects of an intervention on hand function (as measured by the JHFT), the extent to which this instrument shows significant practice effects must be quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the JHFT is susceptible to within-session practice effects. The results showed that the dominant and nondominant hands significantly improved on the JHFT and many of its subtests over six consecutive trials. Although practice effects might complicate the interpretation of change due to intervention, we briefly relate our findings to emerging neuropsychological evidence that practice effects may indicate a person's motor learning potential or treatment responsiveness.",
author = "Sydney Schaefer and Ashley Saba and Baird, {Jessica F.} and Kolar, {Melissa B.} and Kevin Duff and Stewart, {Jill C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5014/ajot.2018.024745",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0272-9490",
publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Within-session practice effects in the jebsen hand function test (JHFT)

AU - Schaefer, Sydney

AU - Saba, Ashley

AU - Baird, Jessica F.

AU - Kolar, Melissa B.

AU - Duff, Kevin

AU - Stewart, Jill C.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) is a standardized assessment that has been used as a clinical outcome measure. To appropriately interpret the effects of an intervention on hand function (as measured by the JHFT), the extent to which this instrument shows significant practice effects must be quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the JHFT is susceptible to within-session practice effects. The results showed that the dominant and nondominant hands significantly improved on the JHFT and many of its subtests over six consecutive trials. Although practice effects might complicate the interpretation of change due to intervention, we briefly relate our findings to emerging neuropsychological evidence that practice effects may indicate a person's motor learning potential or treatment responsiveness.

AB - The Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) is a standardized assessment that has been used as a clinical outcome measure. To appropriately interpret the effects of an intervention on hand function (as measured by the JHFT), the extent to which this instrument shows significant practice effects must be quantified. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the JHFT is susceptible to within-session practice effects. The results showed that the dominant and nondominant hands significantly improved on the JHFT and many of its subtests over six consecutive trials. Although practice effects might complicate the interpretation of change due to intervention, we briefly relate our findings to emerging neuropsychological evidence that practice effects may indicate a person's motor learning potential or treatment responsiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055803541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055803541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2018.024745

DO - 10.5014/ajot.2018.024745

M3 - Article

C2 - 30760402

AN - SCOPUS:85055803541

VL - 72

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0272-9490

IS - 6

ER -