Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets

Yang Yang, Pei-yu Chen, Rajiv Banker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Online innovation contests have been used by more and more firms for idea seeking and problem solving. Most studies of contests take the perspective of innovation seekers, and little is known about solvers' strategies and responses. However, contest performance also relies on understanding solver responses. This paper provides insights to these questions. Specifically, we show that past experience of a solver is a good predictor of his future winning probability and that winners are more likely to be those who submit early or later during the submission period as opposed to those submit in the middle. We also find that "strategic waiting" (to submit solutions) is associated with higher winning probability. Furthermore, we show that different contests appear to attract solvers with different expertise, which invalids the common assumption of fixed solver expertise distribution across projects in previous literature. This finding has strategic implications to the design of contest parameters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011
Pages3737-3752
Number of pages16
Volume5
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event32nd International Conference on Information System 2011, ICIS 2011 - Shanghai, China
Duration: Dec 4 2011Dec 7 2011

Other

Other32nd International Conference on Information System 2011, ICIS 2011
CountryChina
CityShanghai
Period12/4/1112/7/11

Fingerprint

Innovation

Keywords

  • Crowdsourcing
  • Online bidding
  • Online contest
  • Open Innovation
  • Past Experience
  • Strategic bidding
  • Winner determination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Yang, Y., Chen, P., & Banker, R. (2011). Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets. In International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011 (Vol. 5, pp. 3737-3752)

Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets. / Yang, Yang; Chen, Pei-yu; Banker, Rajiv.

International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. Vol. 5 2011. p. 3737-3752.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Yang, Y, Chen, P & Banker, R 2011, Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets. in International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. vol. 5, pp. 3737-3752, 32nd International Conference on Information System 2011, ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China, 12/4/11.
Yang Y, Chen P, Banker R. Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets. In International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. Vol. 5. 2011. p. 3737-3752
Yang, Yang ; Chen, Pei-yu ; Banker, Rajiv. / Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets. International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. Vol. 5 2011. pp. 3737-3752
@inproceedings{ddc21fe41237492c983d0a1efe07c43d,
title = "Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets",
abstract = "Online innovation contests have been used by more and more firms for idea seeking and problem solving. Most studies of contests take the perspective of innovation seekers, and little is known about solvers' strategies and responses. However, contest performance also relies on understanding solver responses. This paper provides insights to these questions. Specifically, we show that past experience of a solver is a good predictor of his future winning probability and that winners are more likely to be those who submit early or later during the submission period as opposed to those submit in the middle. We also find that {"}strategic waiting{"} (to submit solutions) is associated with higher winning probability. Furthermore, we show that different contests appear to attract solvers with different expertise, which invalids the common assumption of fixed solver expertise distribution across projects in previous literature. This finding has strategic implications to the design of contest parameters.",
keywords = "Crowdsourcing, Online bidding, Online contest, Open Innovation, Past Experience, Strategic bidding, Winner determination",
author = "Yang Yang and Pei-yu Chen and Rajiv Banker",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781618394729",
volume = "5",
pages = "3737--3752",
booktitle = "International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Winner determination of open innovation contests in online markets

AU - Yang, Yang

AU - Chen, Pei-yu

AU - Banker, Rajiv

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Online innovation contests have been used by more and more firms for idea seeking and problem solving. Most studies of contests take the perspective of innovation seekers, and little is known about solvers' strategies and responses. However, contest performance also relies on understanding solver responses. This paper provides insights to these questions. Specifically, we show that past experience of a solver is a good predictor of his future winning probability and that winners are more likely to be those who submit early or later during the submission period as opposed to those submit in the middle. We also find that "strategic waiting" (to submit solutions) is associated with higher winning probability. Furthermore, we show that different contests appear to attract solvers with different expertise, which invalids the common assumption of fixed solver expertise distribution across projects in previous literature. This finding has strategic implications to the design of contest parameters.

AB - Online innovation contests have been used by more and more firms for idea seeking and problem solving. Most studies of contests take the perspective of innovation seekers, and little is known about solvers' strategies and responses. However, contest performance also relies on understanding solver responses. This paper provides insights to these questions. Specifically, we show that past experience of a solver is a good predictor of his future winning probability and that winners are more likely to be those who submit early or later during the submission period as opposed to those submit in the middle. We also find that "strategic waiting" (to submit solutions) is associated with higher winning probability. Furthermore, we show that different contests appear to attract solvers with different expertise, which invalids the common assumption of fixed solver expertise distribution across projects in previous literature. This finding has strategic implications to the design of contest parameters.

KW - Crowdsourcing

KW - Online bidding

KW - Online contest

KW - Open Innovation

KW - Past Experience

KW - Strategic bidding

KW - Winner determination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884801262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884801262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781618394729

VL - 5

SP - 3737

EP - 3752

BT - International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011

ER -