Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology

Thomas Seager; Benjamin D. Trump; Kelsey Poinsatte-Jones; Igor Linkov

doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01604

Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology

Thomas Seager, Benjamin D. Trump, Kelsey Poinsatte-Jones, Igor Linkov

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	5861-5862
Number of pages	2
Journal	Environmental Science and Technology
Volume	51
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01604
State	Published - Jun 6 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Chemistry(all)
Environmental Chemistry

Access to Document

10.1021/acs.est.7b01604

Cite this

@article{38c75ffe746e4b85a5027907466eac84,

title = "Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology",

author = "Thomas Seager and Trump, {Benjamin D.} and Kelsey Poinsatte-Jones and Igor Linkov",

note = "Funding Information: This work was funded in part by the US Army Environmental Quality and Installations Research Program (63372803E00). Permission was granted by the authority of the Chief of Engineers to publish this information. TS acknowledges support by the NSF under Grant Nos. 1140190 and 1441352. The authors would like to thank George Shephard for his editorial assistance.",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1021/acs.est.7b01604",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "51",

pages = "5861--5862",

journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",

issn = "0013-936X",

publisher = "American Chemical Society",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Trump, Benjamin D.

AU - Poinsatte-Jones, Kelsey

AU - Linkov, Igor

N1 - Funding Information: This work was funded in part by the US Army Environmental Quality and Installations Research Program (63372803E00). Permission was granted by the authority of the Chief of Engineers to publish this information. TS acknowledges support by the NSF under Grant Nos. 1140190 and 1441352. The authors would like to thank George Shephard for his editorial assistance.

PY - 2017/6/6

Y1 - 2017/6/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021901261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021901261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.7b01604

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.7b01604

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28504514

AN - SCOPUS:85021901261

SN - 0013-936X

VL - 51

SP - 5861

EP - 5862

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

IS - 11

ER -

Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this