What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective

Thomas S. Redick, Zach Shipstead, Elizabeth A. Wiemers, Monica Melby-Lervåg, Charles Hulme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Working memory training programs have generated great interest, with claims that the training interventions can have profound beneficial effects on children’s academic and intellectual attainment. We describe the criteria by which to evaluate evidence for or against the benefit of working memory training. Despite the promising results of initial research studies, the current review of all of the available evidence of working memory training efficacy is less optimistic. Our conclusion is that working memory training produces limited benefits in terms of specific gains on short-term and working memory tasks that are very similar to the training programs, but no advantage for academic and achievement-based reading and arithmetic outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-633
Number of pages17
JournalEducational Psychology Review
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Learning
Education
Reading
Research

Keywords

  • Academic attainment
  • Intervention
  • Training
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Wiemers, E. A., Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2015). What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6

What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective. / Redick, Thomas S.; Shipstead, Zach; Wiemers, Elizabeth A.; Melby-Lervåg, Monica; Hulme, Charles.

In: Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 617-633.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Redick, TS, Shipstead, Z, Wiemers, EA, Melby-Lervåg, M & Hulme, C 2015, 'What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective', Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 617-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6
Redick, Thomas S. ; Shipstead, Zach ; Wiemers, Elizabeth A. ; Melby-Lervåg, Monica ; Hulme, Charles. / What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective. In: Educational Psychology Review. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 617-633.
@article{4e34191383384d729d6cdacfc261f184,
title = "What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective",
abstract = "Working memory training programs have generated great interest, with claims that the training interventions can have profound beneficial effects on children’s academic and intellectual attainment. We describe the criteria by which to evaluate evidence for or against the benefit of working memory training. Despite the promising results of initial research studies, the current review of all of the available evidence of working memory training efficacy is less optimistic. Our conclusion is that working memory training produces limited benefits in terms of specific gains on short-term and working memory tasks that are very similar to the training programs, but no advantage for academic and achievement-based reading and arithmetic outcomes.",
keywords = "Academic attainment, Intervention, Training, Working memory",
author = "Redick, {Thomas S.} and Zach Shipstead and Wiemers, {Elizabeth A.} and Monica Melby-Lerv{\aa}g and Charles Hulme",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "617--633",
journal = "Educational Psychology Review",
issn = "1040-726X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective

AU - Redick, Thomas S.

AU - Shipstead, Zach

AU - Wiemers, Elizabeth A.

AU - Melby-Lervåg, Monica

AU - Hulme, Charles

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Working memory training programs have generated great interest, with claims that the training interventions can have profound beneficial effects on children’s academic and intellectual attainment. We describe the criteria by which to evaluate evidence for or against the benefit of working memory training. Despite the promising results of initial research studies, the current review of all of the available evidence of working memory training efficacy is less optimistic. Our conclusion is that working memory training produces limited benefits in terms of specific gains on short-term and working memory tasks that are very similar to the training programs, but no advantage for academic and achievement-based reading and arithmetic outcomes.

AB - Working memory training programs have generated great interest, with claims that the training interventions can have profound beneficial effects on children’s academic and intellectual attainment. We describe the criteria by which to evaluate evidence for or against the benefit of working memory training. Despite the promising results of initial research studies, the current review of all of the available evidence of working memory training efficacy is less optimistic. Our conclusion is that working memory training produces limited benefits in terms of specific gains on short-term and working memory tasks that are very similar to the training programs, but no advantage for academic and achievement-based reading and arithmetic outcomes.

KW - Academic attainment

KW - Intervention

KW - Training

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948576506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948576506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6

DO - 10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 617

EP - 633

JO - Educational Psychology Review

JF - Educational Psychology Review

SN - 1040-726X

IS - 4

ER -