"We and us, not I and me": Justice, social capital, and household vulnerability in a Nova Scotia fishery

Allain J. Barnett, Hallie Eakin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Marine harvesters face significant livelihood challenges due to the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems, and due to economic fluctuations that influence their incomes. In this study, we demonstrate vulnerability as a product of the interactions among marine harvesters, government and buyers. We combined Elinor Ostrom's attention to the influence of institutions on resource exploitation, with political ecology's attention to perceptions of agency, and the contribution of justice and equity to measuring the success of institutions. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach by examining the multi-species fishery of Barrington, Nova Scotia. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews and 113 surveys in the summer of 2012 with buyers, harvesters, and local experts. We used Ostrom's SES framework to pinpoint system elements that were salient to respondents, with attention to household vulnerability outcomes. Based on an analysis of these themes, we outline three processes affecting vulnerability outcomes: 1) Harvesters preferred individual over collective action due to low procedural justice and social cohesion in decision-making, 2) agents with greater political and economic power gained control over fishing access-rights while others became more dependent on lobster, and 3) economic and ecological conditions, combined with increased dependence, incentivized harvesters to catch more lobsters as prices declined. The case suggests that actors sense of control over their resource base and perception of justice in the process of institutional design may be as significant in vulnerability as the exogenous drivers of change that affect livelihood outcomes. We suggest interventions that may improve these interactions among government, harvesters and buyers, and improve the livelihoods in coastal communities.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)107-116
    Number of pages10
    JournalApplied Geography
    Volume59
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    social capital
    Nova Scotia
    harvesters
    fishery
    households
    vulnerability
    justice
    fisheries
    livelihood
    lobster
    economics
    multispecies fishery
    lobsters
    collective action
    economic power
    overfishing
    social cohesion
    interaction
    right of access
    political power

    Keywords

    • Agency
    • Atlantic Canada
    • Institutions
    • Justice
    • Social capital
    • Vulnerability

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Forestry
    • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
    • Environmental Science(all)
    • Geography, Planning and Development

    Cite this

    "We and us, not I and me" : Justice, social capital, and household vulnerability in a Nova Scotia fishery. / Barnett, Allain J.; Eakin, Hallie.

    In: Applied Geography, Vol. 59, 01.05.2015, p. 107-116.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{14b907a76fa6471f8f827c4bc10a6200,
    title = "{"}We and us, not I and me{"}: Justice, social capital, and household vulnerability in a Nova Scotia fishery",
    abstract = "Marine harvesters face significant livelihood challenges due to the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems, and due to economic fluctuations that influence their incomes. In this study, we demonstrate vulnerability as a product of the interactions among marine harvesters, government and buyers. We combined Elinor Ostrom's attention to the influence of institutions on resource exploitation, with political ecology's attention to perceptions of agency, and the contribution of justice and equity to measuring the success of institutions. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach by examining the multi-species fishery of Barrington, Nova Scotia. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews and 113 surveys in the summer of 2012 with buyers, harvesters, and local experts. We used Ostrom's SES framework to pinpoint system elements that were salient to respondents, with attention to household vulnerability outcomes. Based on an analysis of these themes, we outline three processes affecting vulnerability outcomes: 1) Harvesters preferred individual over collective action due to low procedural justice and social cohesion in decision-making, 2) agents with greater political and economic power gained control over fishing access-rights while others became more dependent on lobster, and 3) economic and ecological conditions, combined with increased dependence, incentivized harvesters to catch more lobsters as prices declined. The case suggests that actors sense of control over their resource base and perception of justice in the process of institutional design may be as significant in vulnerability as the exogenous drivers of change that affect livelihood outcomes. We suggest interventions that may improve these interactions among government, harvesters and buyers, and improve the livelihoods in coastal communities.",
    keywords = "Agency, Atlantic Canada, Institutions, Justice, Social capital, Vulnerability",
    author = "Barnett, {Allain J.} and Hallie Eakin",
    year = "2015",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.005",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "59",
    pages = "107--116",
    journal = "Applied Geography",
    issn = "0143-6228",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - "We and us, not I and me"

    T2 - Justice, social capital, and household vulnerability in a Nova Scotia fishery

    AU - Barnett, Allain J.

    AU - Eakin, Hallie

    PY - 2015/5/1

    Y1 - 2015/5/1

    N2 - Marine harvesters face significant livelihood challenges due to the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems, and due to economic fluctuations that influence their incomes. In this study, we demonstrate vulnerability as a product of the interactions among marine harvesters, government and buyers. We combined Elinor Ostrom's attention to the influence of institutions on resource exploitation, with political ecology's attention to perceptions of agency, and the contribution of justice and equity to measuring the success of institutions. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach by examining the multi-species fishery of Barrington, Nova Scotia. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews and 113 surveys in the summer of 2012 with buyers, harvesters, and local experts. We used Ostrom's SES framework to pinpoint system elements that were salient to respondents, with attention to household vulnerability outcomes. Based on an analysis of these themes, we outline three processes affecting vulnerability outcomes: 1) Harvesters preferred individual over collective action due to low procedural justice and social cohesion in decision-making, 2) agents with greater political and economic power gained control over fishing access-rights while others became more dependent on lobster, and 3) economic and ecological conditions, combined with increased dependence, incentivized harvesters to catch more lobsters as prices declined. The case suggests that actors sense of control over their resource base and perception of justice in the process of institutional design may be as significant in vulnerability as the exogenous drivers of change that affect livelihood outcomes. We suggest interventions that may improve these interactions among government, harvesters and buyers, and improve the livelihoods in coastal communities.

    AB - Marine harvesters face significant livelihood challenges due to the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems, and due to economic fluctuations that influence their incomes. In this study, we demonstrate vulnerability as a product of the interactions among marine harvesters, government and buyers. We combined Elinor Ostrom's attention to the influence of institutions on resource exploitation, with political ecology's attention to perceptions of agency, and the contribution of justice and equity to measuring the success of institutions. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach by examining the multi-species fishery of Barrington, Nova Scotia. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews and 113 surveys in the summer of 2012 with buyers, harvesters, and local experts. We used Ostrom's SES framework to pinpoint system elements that were salient to respondents, with attention to household vulnerability outcomes. Based on an analysis of these themes, we outline three processes affecting vulnerability outcomes: 1) Harvesters preferred individual over collective action due to low procedural justice and social cohesion in decision-making, 2) agents with greater political and economic power gained control over fishing access-rights while others became more dependent on lobster, and 3) economic and ecological conditions, combined with increased dependence, incentivized harvesters to catch more lobsters as prices declined. The case suggests that actors sense of control over their resource base and perception of justice in the process of institutional design may be as significant in vulnerability as the exogenous drivers of change that affect livelihood outcomes. We suggest interventions that may improve these interactions among government, harvesters and buyers, and improve the livelihoods in coastal communities.

    KW - Agency

    KW - Atlantic Canada

    KW - Institutions

    KW - Justice

    KW - Social capital

    KW - Vulnerability

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928620880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928620880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.005

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84928620880

    VL - 59

    SP - 107

    EP - 116

    JO - Applied Geography

    JF - Applied Geography

    SN - 0143-6228

    ER -