Watching Brian die: The rhetoric and reality of informed consent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two years ago, my brother-in-law was injured in a catastrophic industrial accident, which left him with second and third degree burns over 95 percent of his body. Writing both as a family member and as a sociologist, I analyse how his doctors increased their decision-making authority at the expense of informed consent, explore why they did so, and discuss the consequences for families when informed consent is not obtained. I also discuss the difficulties of achieving informed consent when family members have conflicting views on treatment. The conclusions use this story to reflect on the problems of implementing informed consent in clinical practice and on what these problems tell us about US doctors' continuing power and clinical autonomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-227
Number of pages19
JournalHealth
Volume3
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1999

Fingerprint

Informed Consent
family member
rhetoric
sociologist
accident
autonomy
Occupational Accidents
decision making
Law
Siblings
Decision Making
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Burns
  • Informed consent
  • Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Watching Brian die : The rhetoric and reality of informed consent. / Weitz, Rose.

In: Health, Vol. 3, No. 2, 04.1999, p. 209-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{edeb3dbf2b2e47e88ee68ab2d1f1a4c8,
title = "Watching Brian die: The rhetoric and reality of informed consent",
abstract = "Two years ago, my brother-in-law was injured in a catastrophic industrial accident, which left him with second and third degree burns over 95 percent of his body. Writing both as a family member and as a sociologist, I analyse how his doctors increased their decision-making authority at the expense of informed consent, explore why they did so, and discuss the consequences for families when informed consent is not obtained. I also discuss the difficulties of achieving informed consent when family members have conflicting views on treatment. The conclusions use this story to reflect on the problems of implementing informed consent in clinical practice and on what these problems tell us about US doctors' continuing power and clinical autonomy.",
keywords = "Bioethics, Burns, Informed consent, Physicians",
author = "Rose Weitz",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "209--227",
journal = "Health (United Kingdom)",
issn = "1363-4593",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Watching Brian die

T2 - The rhetoric and reality of informed consent

AU - Weitz, Rose

PY - 1999/4

Y1 - 1999/4

N2 - Two years ago, my brother-in-law was injured in a catastrophic industrial accident, which left him with second and third degree burns over 95 percent of his body. Writing both as a family member and as a sociologist, I analyse how his doctors increased their decision-making authority at the expense of informed consent, explore why they did so, and discuss the consequences for families when informed consent is not obtained. I also discuss the difficulties of achieving informed consent when family members have conflicting views on treatment. The conclusions use this story to reflect on the problems of implementing informed consent in clinical practice and on what these problems tell us about US doctors' continuing power and clinical autonomy.

AB - Two years ago, my brother-in-law was injured in a catastrophic industrial accident, which left him with second and third degree burns over 95 percent of his body. Writing both as a family member and as a sociologist, I analyse how his doctors increased their decision-making authority at the expense of informed consent, explore why they did so, and discuss the consequences for families when informed consent is not obtained. I also discuss the difficulties of achieving informed consent when family members have conflicting views on treatment. The conclusions use this story to reflect on the problems of implementing informed consent in clinical practice and on what these problems tell us about US doctors' continuing power and clinical autonomy.

KW - Bioethics

KW - Burns

KW - Informed consent

KW - Physicians

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141721249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141721249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0141721249

VL - 3

SP - 209

EP - 227

JO - Health (United Kingdom)

JF - Health (United Kingdom)

SN - 1363-4593

IS - 2

ER -