Abstract

What makes recycling work? We study the factors driving household waste disposal and recycling in 18 cities in Taiwan and Japan in order to understand the impact of alternative waste management incentives. We show that this depends on the effect of distinct policies on the relative costs of the main alternative disposal methods: recycling, disposal to landfill and illegal dumping. The willingness both to recycle and to dispose to landfill depends on the relative costs of the waste collection regime, and these are dominated by the time cost of alternative disposal methods. The higher the frequency of waste collection, the less recycling and the more disposal to landfill there will be. This is because frequent collection reduces the marginal time-cost of disposal to landfill. Curbside collection of recyclable material, and the frequency of that collection, has a similar effect on the recycling rate. Although direct incentives, such as unit pricing are important in the waste disposal decision, recycling depends primarily on management of the time-costs it involves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-437
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental and Resource Economics
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Waste disposal
Recycling
incentive
recycling
landfill
Land fill
cost
waste disposal
Costs
domestic waste
waste management
Waste management
Taiwan
Incentives
Japan
Wasting
Disposal
Landfill
Time costs
method

Keywords

  • Illegal dumping
  • Recycling
  • Solid waste
  • Waste disposal costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Wasting Time? Recycling Incentives in Urban Taiwan and Japan. / Kuo, Yen Lien; Perrings, Charles.

In: Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2010, p. 423-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{428bd9e074004686b52416ad1b6d910b,
title = "Wasting Time? Recycling Incentives in Urban Taiwan and Japan",
abstract = "What makes recycling work? We study the factors driving household waste disposal and recycling in 18 cities in Taiwan and Japan in order to understand the impact of alternative waste management incentives. We show that this depends on the effect of distinct policies on the relative costs of the main alternative disposal methods: recycling, disposal to landfill and illegal dumping. The willingness both to recycle and to dispose to landfill depends on the relative costs of the waste collection regime, and these are dominated by the time cost of alternative disposal methods. The higher the frequency of waste collection, the less recycling and the more disposal to landfill there will be. This is because frequent collection reduces the marginal time-cost of disposal to landfill. Curbside collection of recyclable material, and the frequency of that collection, has a similar effect on the recycling rate. Although direct incentives, such as unit pricing are important in the waste disposal decision, recycling depends primarily on management of the time-costs it involves.",
keywords = "Illegal dumping, Recycling, Solid waste, Waste disposal costs",
author = "Kuo, {Yen Lien} and Charles Perrings",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s10640-010-9386-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "423--437",
journal = "Environmental and Resource Economics",
issn = "0924-6460",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wasting Time? Recycling Incentives in Urban Taiwan and Japan

AU - Kuo, Yen Lien

AU - Perrings, Charles

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - What makes recycling work? We study the factors driving household waste disposal and recycling in 18 cities in Taiwan and Japan in order to understand the impact of alternative waste management incentives. We show that this depends on the effect of distinct policies on the relative costs of the main alternative disposal methods: recycling, disposal to landfill and illegal dumping. The willingness both to recycle and to dispose to landfill depends on the relative costs of the waste collection regime, and these are dominated by the time cost of alternative disposal methods. The higher the frequency of waste collection, the less recycling and the more disposal to landfill there will be. This is because frequent collection reduces the marginal time-cost of disposal to landfill. Curbside collection of recyclable material, and the frequency of that collection, has a similar effect on the recycling rate. Although direct incentives, such as unit pricing are important in the waste disposal decision, recycling depends primarily on management of the time-costs it involves.

AB - What makes recycling work? We study the factors driving household waste disposal and recycling in 18 cities in Taiwan and Japan in order to understand the impact of alternative waste management incentives. We show that this depends on the effect of distinct policies on the relative costs of the main alternative disposal methods: recycling, disposal to landfill and illegal dumping. The willingness both to recycle and to dispose to landfill depends on the relative costs of the waste collection regime, and these are dominated by the time cost of alternative disposal methods. The higher the frequency of waste collection, the less recycling and the more disposal to landfill there will be. This is because frequent collection reduces the marginal time-cost of disposal to landfill. Curbside collection of recyclable material, and the frequency of that collection, has a similar effect on the recycling rate. Although direct incentives, such as unit pricing are important in the waste disposal decision, recycling depends primarily on management of the time-costs it involves.

KW - Illegal dumping

KW - Recycling

KW - Solid waste

KW - Waste disposal costs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958493026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958493026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10640-010-9386-1

DO - 10.1007/s10640-010-9386-1

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 423

EP - 437

JO - Environmental and Resource Economics

JF - Environmental and Resource Economics

SN - 0924-6460

IS - 3

ER -