War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

118 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars of Latin America have recently begun to apply the bellicist approach to state building to the region, the central claim of which is that wars area great stimulus to centralizing state power and building institutional capacity. This article argues that current applications of these models of state building are too narrowly specified to be of much use in Latin America or elsewhere in the developing world. Replacing the focus on interstate war with the more general phenomenon of interstate rivalry, alongside the consideration of intrastate rivals, allows us to account for the impact of both external and internal forces on the development of the state. I demonstrate the utility of this approach through several cross-sectional time-series analyses that provide evidence that external and internal rivals affect the Latin American state in a manner consistent with the general nature of bellicist theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)451-465
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Latin America
time series
stimulus
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America. / Thies, Cameron.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 49, No. 3, 07.2005, p. 451-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7cb98d388494414862d4c4a5313e384,
title = "War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America",
abstract = "Scholars of Latin America have recently begun to apply the bellicist approach to state building to the region, the central claim of which is that wars area great stimulus to centralizing state power and building institutional capacity. This article argues that current applications of these models of state building are too narrowly specified to be of much use in Latin America or elsewhere in the developing world. Replacing the focus on interstate war with the more general phenomenon of interstate rivalry, alongside the consideration of intrastate rivals, allows us to account for the impact of both external and internal forces on the development of the state. I demonstrate the utility of this approach through several cross-sectional time-series analyses that provide evidence that external and internal rivals affect the Latin American state in a manner consistent with the general nature of bellicist theory.",
author = "Cameron Thies",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00134.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "451--465",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America

AU - Thies, Cameron

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Scholars of Latin America have recently begun to apply the bellicist approach to state building to the region, the central claim of which is that wars area great stimulus to centralizing state power and building institutional capacity. This article argues that current applications of these models of state building are too narrowly specified to be of much use in Latin America or elsewhere in the developing world. Replacing the focus on interstate war with the more general phenomenon of interstate rivalry, alongside the consideration of intrastate rivals, allows us to account for the impact of both external and internal forces on the development of the state. I demonstrate the utility of this approach through several cross-sectional time-series analyses that provide evidence that external and internal rivals affect the Latin American state in a manner consistent with the general nature of bellicist theory.

AB - Scholars of Latin America have recently begun to apply the bellicist approach to state building to the region, the central claim of which is that wars area great stimulus to centralizing state power and building institutional capacity. This article argues that current applications of these models of state building are too narrowly specified to be of much use in Latin America or elsewhere in the developing world. Replacing the focus on interstate war with the more general phenomenon of interstate rivalry, alongside the consideration of intrastate rivals, allows us to account for the impact of both external and internal forces on the development of the state. I demonstrate the utility of this approach through several cross-sectional time-series analyses that provide evidence that external and internal rivals affect the Latin American state in a manner consistent with the general nature of bellicist theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844533018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844533018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00134.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00134.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27844533018

VL - 49

SP - 451

EP - 465

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 3

ER -