Voluntary climate action and credible regulatory threat: evidence from the carbon disclosure project

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines the role that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s introduction of the Clean Power Plan played in voluntary carbon disclosure by the Global 500 firms during 2011–2015. Results from difference-in-difference-in-differences estimators nested in a two-stage endogenous binary-variable model—which accounts for the correlation between a firm’s participation and intensity of participation—show that U.S.-based firms acted preemptively in anticipation of a more stringent regulatory environment. Regardless of country of origin, among firms making voluntary disclosures, the Clean Power Plan was associated with higher levels of carbon disclosure in firms with favorable management structures and practices involving the agency of corporate management, ceteris paribus. Empirical analysis includes controls for firm size, natural gas prices, sector-specific market pressures, and macro-economic and political economy dynamics. Results are robust to alternative specifications, including a trimmed matching sample, the Heckman selection model, and sector-specific regressions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Regulatory Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Disclosure
Carbon
Threat
Climate
Natural gas
Anticipation
Management practices
Firm size
Difference-in-differences estimator
Difference-in-differences-in-differences
Macroeconomics
Regulatory environment
Political economy
Corporate management
Selection model
Voluntary disclosure
Ceteris paribus
Participation
Empirical analysis
Country of origin

Keywords

  • Carbon disclosure
  • Clean Power Plan
  • Climate mitigation
  • Corporate social responsiblity
  • Difference-in-difference-in-differences
  • Endogenous binary variable model
  • Industry self-regulation
  • Private provision of public goods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{7cd0030b4f74458aa2ec4761d121e5a3,
title = "Voluntary climate action and credible regulatory threat: evidence from the carbon disclosure project",
abstract = "This paper examines the role that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s introduction of the Clean Power Plan played in voluntary carbon disclosure by the Global 500 firms during 2011–2015. Results from difference-in-difference-in-differences estimators nested in a two-stage endogenous binary-variable model—which accounts for the correlation between a firm’s participation and intensity of participation—show that U.S.-based firms acted preemptively in anticipation of a more stringent regulatory environment. Regardless of country of origin, among firms making voluntary disclosures, the Clean Power Plan was associated with higher levels of carbon disclosure in firms with favorable management structures and practices involving the agency of corporate management, ceteris paribus. Empirical analysis includes controls for firm size, natural gas prices, sector-specific market pressures, and macro-economic and political economy dynamics. Results are robust to alternative specifications, including a trimmed matching sample, the Heckman selection model, and sector-specific regressions.",
keywords = "Carbon disclosure, Clean Power Plan, Climate mitigation, Corporate social responsiblity, Difference-in-difference-in-differences, Endogenous binary variable model, Industry self-regulation, Private provision of public goods",
author = "Lily Hsueh",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11149-019-09390-z",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Regulatory Economics",
issn = "0922-680X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voluntary climate action and credible regulatory threat

T2 - evidence from the carbon disclosure project

AU - Hsueh, Lily

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the role that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s introduction of the Clean Power Plan played in voluntary carbon disclosure by the Global 500 firms during 2011–2015. Results from difference-in-difference-in-differences estimators nested in a two-stage endogenous binary-variable model—which accounts for the correlation between a firm’s participation and intensity of participation—show that U.S.-based firms acted preemptively in anticipation of a more stringent regulatory environment. Regardless of country of origin, among firms making voluntary disclosures, the Clean Power Plan was associated with higher levels of carbon disclosure in firms with favorable management structures and practices involving the agency of corporate management, ceteris paribus. Empirical analysis includes controls for firm size, natural gas prices, sector-specific market pressures, and macro-economic and political economy dynamics. Results are robust to alternative specifications, including a trimmed matching sample, the Heckman selection model, and sector-specific regressions.

AB - This paper examines the role that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s introduction of the Clean Power Plan played in voluntary carbon disclosure by the Global 500 firms during 2011–2015. Results from difference-in-difference-in-differences estimators nested in a two-stage endogenous binary-variable model—which accounts for the correlation between a firm’s participation and intensity of participation—show that U.S.-based firms acted preemptively in anticipation of a more stringent regulatory environment. Regardless of country of origin, among firms making voluntary disclosures, the Clean Power Plan was associated with higher levels of carbon disclosure in firms with favorable management structures and practices involving the agency of corporate management, ceteris paribus. Empirical analysis includes controls for firm size, natural gas prices, sector-specific market pressures, and macro-economic and political economy dynamics. Results are robust to alternative specifications, including a trimmed matching sample, the Heckman selection model, and sector-specific regressions.

KW - Carbon disclosure

KW - Clean Power Plan

KW - Climate mitigation

KW - Corporate social responsiblity

KW - Difference-in-difference-in-differences

KW - Endogenous binary variable model

KW - Industry self-regulation

KW - Private provision of public goods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074512360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074512360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11149-019-09390-z

DO - 10.1007/s11149-019-09390-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074512360

JO - Journal of Regulatory Economics

JF - Journal of Regulatory Economics

SN - 0922-680X

ER -