Victim derogation in the Lerner paradigm: Just world or just justification?

Robert B. Cialdini, Douglas Kenrick, James H. Hoerig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conducted an experiment with 87 female undergraduates to test the possibility that derogation of a victim in the M. L. Lerner paradigm is mediated not by a desire to believe in a "just world" but rather by a desire to justify one's possible complicity in the production of harm. It was predicted that in a standard Lerner setting, Ss who were unambiguously informed that the data they would generate were not at the cause of the victim's suffering would show no significant victim derogation effect. This prediction was confirmed by 2 related measures of derogation. The derogation effect did appear, however, when Ss received standard Lerner-type instructions that were ambiguous regarding the instrumentality of their experimental roles to the production of the victim's pain. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)719-724
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1976
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Complicity
paradigm
Psychological Stress
Pain
pain
instruction
cause
experiment

Keywords

  • ambiguous vs unambiguous instructions concerning S's production of pain to victim, victim derogation, female college students, implications for M. L. Lerner paradigm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Victim derogation in the Lerner paradigm : Just world or just justification? / Cialdini, Robert B.; Kenrick, Douglas; Hoerig, James H.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.01.1976, p. 719-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{881e33db77ad41e3b584a74f1c0c17c7,
title = "Victim derogation in the Lerner paradigm: Just world or just justification?",
abstract = "Conducted an experiment with 87 female undergraduates to test the possibility that derogation of a victim in the M. L. Lerner paradigm is mediated not by a desire to believe in a {"}just world{"} but rather by a desire to justify one's possible complicity in the production of harm. It was predicted that in a standard Lerner setting, Ss who were unambiguously informed that the data they would generate were not at the cause of the victim's suffering would show no significant victim derogation effect. This prediction was confirmed by 2 related measures of derogation. The derogation effect did appear, however, when Ss received standard Lerner-type instructions that were ambiguous regarding the instrumentality of their experimental roles to the production of the victim's pain. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "ambiguous vs unambiguous instructions concerning S's production of pain to victim, victim derogation, female college students, implications for M. L. Lerner paradigm",
author = "Cialdini, {Robert B.} and Douglas Kenrick and Hoerig, {James H.}",
year = "1976",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.719",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "719--724",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victim derogation in the Lerner paradigm

T2 - Just world or just justification?

AU - Cialdini, Robert B.

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

AU - Hoerig, James H.

PY - 1976/1/1

Y1 - 1976/1/1

N2 - Conducted an experiment with 87 female undergraduates to test the possibility that derogation of a victim in the M. L. Lerner paradigm is mediated not by a desire to believe in a "just world" but rather by a desire to justify one's possible complicity in the production of harm. It was predicted that in a standard Lerner setting, Ss who were unambiguously informed that the data they would generate were not at the cause of the victim's suffering would show no significant victim derogation effect. This prediction was confirmed by 2 related measures of derogation. The derogation effect did appear, however, when Ss received standard Lerner-type instructions that were ambiguous regarding the instrumentality of their experimental roles to the production of the victim's pain. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Conducted an experiment with 87 female undergraduates to test the possibility that derogation of a victim in the M. L. Lerner paradigm is mediated not by a desire to believe in a "just world" but rather by a desire to justify one's possible complicity in the production of harm. It was predicted that in a standard Lerner setting, Ss who were unambiguously informed that the data they would generate were not at the cause of the victim's suffering would show no significant victim derogation effect. This prediction was confirmed by 2 related measures of derogation. The derogation effect did appear, however, when Ss received standard Lerner-type instructions that were ambiguous regarding the instrumentality of their experimental roles to the production of the victim's pain. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - ambiguous vs unambiguous instructions concerning S's production of pain to victim, victim derogation, female college students, implications for M. L. Lerner paradigm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047682272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047682272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.719

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.719

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047682272

VL - 33

SP - 719

EP - 724

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -