Variations of acoustic and diffuse mismatch models in predicting thermal-boundary resistance

Lisa De Bellis, Patrick Phelan, Ravi S. Prasher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Solid-solid thermal-boundary resistance plays an important role in determining heat flow, in both cryogenic and room-temperature applications. The acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and the diffuse mismatch model (DMM) have traditionally been used to predict the thermal boundary resistance Rb across the interface of two adjoining materials at temperatures well below the Debye temperatures of the materials in question. Both the AMM and DMM use the Debye density of states (DOS) in both contacting solids. Here, the use of a measured DOS is made in conjunction with the DMM. This shows an improvement in the prediction of Rb relative to that based on the Debye DOS. Another approach considered is to predict Rb from measured specific heat per unit volume C data. The measured C automatically includes the effect of temperature on the DOS. This leads to a marginal improvement in Rb above that predicted when using the measured DOS. The AMM describes the thermal transport at a solid-solid interface below a few Kelvin quite accurately. The DMM, theoretically more suitable for interfacial transport above a few Kelvin, is no better than AMM for predicting the thermal-boundary resistance at a solid-solid interface. This raises the possibility that both diffuse and specular reflections are taking place at the interface. This kind of mixed reflection is very common in radiative transport. Owing to the similarity in phonon transport and radiative transport a mixed model, considering both specular and diffuse reflection, is developed, which is able to predict Rb values between those of the AMM and DMM. Further, a regime map is developed which delineates three predominant regimes describing the dominance of the Rb predictions made by the AMM, DMM, and mixed models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-150
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2000

Fingerprint

Acoustics
acoustics
solid-solid interfaces
specular reflection
Radiative transfer
Hot Temperature
specific heat
Debye temperature
cryogenic temperature
predictions
heat transmission
Cryogenics
Temperature
Specific heat
Heat transfer
temperature
room temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Variations of acoustic and diffuse mismatch models in predicting thermal-boundary resistance. / De Bellis, Lisa; Phelan, Patrick; Prasher, Ravi S.

In: Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 14, No. 2, 04.2000, p. 144-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70f1166bebbc49b5b5a69fe8545c5c6c,
title = "Variations of acoustic and diffuse mismatch models in predicting thermal-boundary resistance",
abstract = "Solid-solid thermal-boundary resistance plays an important role in determining heat flow, in both cryogenic and room-temperature applications. The acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and the diffuse mismatch model (DMM) have traditionally been used to predict the thermal boundary resistance Rb across the interface of two adjoining materials at temperatures well below the Debye temperatures of the materials in question. Both the AMM and DMM use the Debye density of states (DOS) in both contacting solids. Here, the use of a measured DOS is made in conjunction with the DMM. This shows an improvement in the prediction of Rb relative to that based on the Debye DOS. Another approach considered is to predict Rb from measured specific heat per unit volume C data. The measured C automatically includes the effect of temperature on the DOS. This leads to a marginal improvement in Rb above that predicted when using the measured DOS. The AMM describes the thermal transport at a solid-solid interface below a few Kelvin quite accurately. The DMM, theoretically more suitable for interfacial transport above a few Kelvin, is no better than AMM for predicting the thermal-boundary resistance at a solid-solid interface. This raises the possibility that both diffuse and specular reflections are taking place at the interface. This kind of mixed reflection is very common in radiative transport. Owing to the similarity in phonon transport and radiative transport a mixed model, considering both specular and diffuse reflection, is developed, which is able to predict Rb values between those of the AMM and DMM. Further, a regime map is developed which delineates three predominant regimes describing the dominance of the Rb predictions made by the AMM, DMM, and mixed models.",
author = "{De Bellis}, Lisa and Patrick Phelan and Prasher, {Ravi S.}",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "144--150",
journal = "Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer",
issn = "0887-8722",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variations of acoustic and diffuse mismatch models in predicting thermal-boundary resistance

AU - De Bellis, Lisa

AU - Phelan, Patrick

AU - Prasher, Ravi S.

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - Solid-solid thermal-boundary resistance plays an important role in determining heat flow, in both cryogenic and room-temperature applications. The acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and the diffuse mismatch model (DMM) have traditionally been used to predict the thermal boundary resistance Rb across the interface of two adjoining materials at temperatures well below the Debye temperatures of the materials in question. Both the AMM and DMM use the Debye density of states (DOS) in both contacting solids. Here, the use of a measured DOS is made in conjunction with the DMM. This shows an improvement in the prediction of Rb relative to that based on the Debye DOS. Another approach considered is to predict Rb from measured specific heat per unit volume C data. The measured C automatically includes the effect of temperature on the DOS. This leads to a marginal improvement in Rb above that predicted when using the measured DOS. The AMM describes the thermal transport at a solid-solid interface below a few Kelvin quite accurately. The DMM, theoretically more suitable for interfacial transport above a few Kelvin, is no better than AMM for predicting the thermal-boundary resistance at a solid-solid interface. This raises the possibility that both diffuse and specular reflections are taking place at the interface. This kind of mixed reflection is very common in radiative transport. Owing to the similarity in phonon transport and radiative transport a mixed model, considering both specular and diffuse reflection, is developed, which is able to predict Rb values between those of the AMM and DMM. Further, a regime map is developed which delineates three predominant regimes describing the dominance of the Rb predictions made by the AMM, DMM, and mixed models.

AB - Solid-solid thermal-boundary resistance plays an important role in determining heat flow, in both cryogenic and room-temperature applications. The acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and the diffuse mismatch model (DMM) have traditionally been used to predict the thermal boundary resistance Rb across the interface of two adjoining materials at temperatures well below the Debye temperatures of the materials in question. Both the AMM and DMM use the Debye density of states (DOS) in both contacting solids. Here, the use of a measured DOS is made in conjunction with the DMM. This shows an improvement in the prediction of Rb relative to that based on the Debye DOS. Another approach considered is to predict Rb from measured specific heat per unit volume C data. The measured C automatically includes the effect of temperature on the DOS. This leads to a marginal improvement in Rb above that predicted when using the measured DOS. The AMM describes the thermal transport at a solid-solid interface below a few Kelvin quite accurately. The DMM, theoretically more suitable for interfacial transport above a few Kelvin, is no better than AMM for predicting the thermal-boundary resistance at a solid-solid interface. This raises the possibility that both diffuse and specular reflections are taking place at the interface. This kind of mixed reflection is very common in radiative transport. Owing to the similarity in phonon transport and radiative transport a mixed model, considering both specular and diffuse reflection, is developed, which is able to predict Rb values between those of the AMM and DMM. Further, a regime map is developed which delineates three predominant regimes describing the dominance of the Rb predictions made by the AMM, DMM, and mixed models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033742835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033742835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 144

EP - 150

JO - Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer

JF - Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer

SN - 0887-8722

IS - 2

ER -