Validity and validation in the making in the context of qualitative research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, I focus on two ways of conceptualizing validity and validation, by using reductionist and (e)pistemological approaches, respectively. I question some common understandings of reductionist validation and describe an (e)pistemological standpoint that provides an alternative to reductionist views. In addition, I argue that validity and validation, as concepts, are tools rather than reflections of truth. Furthermore, fallibility, which is embedded in all views of validity and validation, can be compensated with pluralism, as well as acceptance, coexistence, and collaboration with the Other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)983-989
Number of pages7
JournalQualitative Health Research
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cultural Diversity
Qualitative Research
qualitative research
coexistence
pluralism
acceptance

Keywords

  • Epistemology
  • General
  • Qualitative methods
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Validity and validation in the making in the context of qualitative research. / Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka.

In: Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 18, No. 7, 07.2008, p. 983-989.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05f4e888f21f4e3bb76a8b3ab551c4c3,
title = "Validity and validation in the making in the context of qualitative research",
abstract = "In this article, I focus on two ways of conceptualizing validity and validation, by using reductionist and (e)pistemological approaches, respectively. I question some common understandings of reductionist validation and describe an (e)pistemological standpoint that provides an alternative to reductionist views. In addition, I argue that validity and validation, as concepts, are tools rather than reflections of truth. Furthermore, fallibility, which is embedded in all views of validity and validation, can be compensated with pluralism, as well as acceptance, coexistence, and collaboration with the Other.",
keywords = "Epistemology, General, Qualitative methods, Validity",
author = "Mirka Koro-Ljungberg",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1049732308318039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "983--989",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1049-7323",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and validation in the making in the context of qualitative research

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - In this article, I focus on two ways of conceptualizing validity and validation, by using reductionist and (e)pistemological approaches, respectively. I question some common understandings of reductionist validation and describe an (e)pistemological standpoint that provides an alternative to reductionist views. In addition, I argue that validity and validation, as concepts, are tools rather than reflections of truth. Furthermore, fallibility, which is embedded in all views of validity and validation, can be compensated with pluralism, as well as acceptance, coexistence, and collaboration with the Other.

AB - In this article, I focus on two ways of conceptualizing validity and validation, by using reductionist and (e)pistemological approaches, respectively. I question some common understandings of reductionist validation and describe an (e)pistemological standpoint that provides an alternative to reductionist views. In addition, I argue that validity and validation, as concepts, are tools rather than reflections of truth. Furthermore, fallibility, which is embedded in all views of validity and validation, can be compensated with pluralism, as well as acceptance, coexistence, and collaboration with the Other.

KW - Epistemology

KW - General

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45249106389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45249106389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049732308318039

DO - 10.1177/1049732308318039

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 983

EP - 989

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1049-7323

IS - 7

ER -