Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system

J. E. McLaughlin, G. A. King, E. T. Howley, D. R. Bassett, Barbara Ainsworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

393 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag (DB) method. During cycle ergometry on consecutive days, oxygen consumption (V̇O2), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory exchange ratio (R) were measured at rest and during power outputs of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250W. No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in V̇O2 between the K4 b2 and DB at rest and at 250W. Though the K4 b2 values were significantly higher (P<0.05) than DB values at 50, 100, 150, and 200W, the magnitude of these differences was small (0.088, 0.092, 0.096, and 0.088 L×min-1, respectively). V̇CO2 and V̇E values from the K4 b2 were significantly lower than the DB at 200 and 250W, while no significant differences were observed from rest through 150W. The slight overestimation of V̇O2 (50-200W) combined with the underestimation of V̇CO2 (200 and 250W) by the K4 b2 resulted in significantly lower R values at every stage. These findings suggest the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake over a fairly wide range of exercise intensities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-284
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ventilation
Ergometry
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen Consumption
Oxygen

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Exercise
  • Indirect calorimetry
  • Oxygen consumption
  • Portable

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

McLaughlin, J. E., King, G. A., Howley, E. T., Bassett, D. R., & Ainsworth, B. (2001). Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 22(4), 280-284. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-13816

Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system. / McLaughlin, J. E.; King, G. A.; Howley, E. T.; Bassett, D. R.; Ainsworth, Barbara.

In: International Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2001, p. 280-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McLaughlin, JE, King, GA, Howley, ET, Bassett, DR & Ainsworth, B 2001, 'Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system', International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 280-284. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-13816
McLaughlin, J. E. ; King, G. A. ; Howley, E. T. ; Bassett, D. R. ; Ainsworth, Barbara. / Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system. In: International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 280-284.
@article{2abb812da3b14b46bac01ce8e4f57334,
title = "Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system",
abstract = "The purpose of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag (DB) method. During cycle ergometry on consecutive days, oxygen consumption (V̇O2), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory exchange ratio (R) were measured at rest and during power outputs of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250W. No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in V̇O2 between the K4 b2 and DB at rest and at 250W. Though the K4 b2 values were significantly higher (P<0.05) than DB values at 50, 100, 150, and 200W, the magnitude of these differences was small (0.088, 0.092, 0.096, and 0.088 L×min-1, respectively). V̇CO2 and V̇E values from the K4 b2 were significantly lower than the DB at 200 and 250W, while no significant differences were observed from rest through 150W. The slight overestimation of V̇O2 (50-200W) combined with the underestimation of V̇CO2 (200 and 250W) by the K4 b2 resulted in significantly lower R values at every stage. These findings suggest the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake over a fairly wide range of exercise intensities.",
keywords = "Assessment, Exercise, Indirect calorimetry, Oxygen consumption, Portable",
author = "McLaughlin, {J. E.} and King, {G. A.} and Howley, {E. T.} and Bassett, {D. R.} and Barbara Ainsworth",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1055/s-2001-13816",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "280--284",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0172-4622",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system

AU - McLaughlin, J. E.

AU - King, G. A.

AU - Howley, E. T.

AU - Bassett, D. R.

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The purpose of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag (DB) method. During cycle ergometry on consecutive days, oxygen consumption (V̇O2), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory exchange ratio (R) were measured at rest and during power outputs of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250W. No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in V̇O2 between the K4 b2 and DB at rest and at 250W. Though the K4 b2 values were significantly higher (P<0.05) than DB values at 50, 100, 150, and 200W, the magnitude of these differences was small (0.088, 0.092, 0.096, and 0.088 L×min-1, respectively). V̇CO2 and V̇E values from the K4 b2 were significantly lower than the DB at 200 and 250W, while no significant differences were observed from rest through 150W. The slight overestimation of V̇O2 (50-200W) combined with the underestimation of V̇CO2 (200 and 250W) by the K4 b2 resulted in significantly lower R values at every stage. These findings suggest the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake over a fairly wide range of exercise intensities.

AB - The purpose of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag (DB) method. During cycle ergometry on consecutive days, oxygen consumption (V̇O2), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2), minute ventilation (VE), and respiratory exchange ratio (R) were measured at rest and during power outputs of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250W. No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in V̇O2 between the K4 b2 and DB at rest and at 250W. Though the K4 b2 values were significantly higher (P<0.05) than DB values at 50, 100, 150, and 200W, the magnitude of these differences was small (0.088, 0.092, 0.096, and 0.088 L×min-1, respectively). V̇CO2 and V̇E values from the K4 b2 were significantly lower than the DB at 200 and 250W, while no significant differences were observed from rest through 150W. The slight overestimation of V̇O2 (50-200W) combined with the underestimation of V̇CO2 (200 and 250W) by the K4 b2 resulted in significantly lower R values at every stage. These findings suggest the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake over a fairly wide range of exercise intensities.

KW - Assessment

KW - Exercise

KW - Indirect calorimetry

KW - Oxygen consumption

KW - Portable

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035021150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035021150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2001-13816

DO - 10.1055/s-2001-13816

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 280

EP - 284

JO - International Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - International Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0172-4622

IS - 4

ER -