Using Cost-Benefit Analysis To Evaluate Correctional Sentences

Tara Gray, Clark R. Larsen, Peter Haynes, Kent W. Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

When Haynes and Larsen gathered self-report and official data from burglars, they found the high cost of recidivistic crime causes probation to cost more than prison. Gray and Olson analyzed the data again, arguing that researchers should measure rehabilitation, the difference between priors and recidivism, rather than recidivism alone. They found that prison may generate so much dehabilitation that it costs more than probation. In this study, the four authors analyze their conflicting results and show how cost-benefit analysis can inform policymakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-481
Number of pages11
JournalEvaluation Review
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Using Cost-Benefit Analysis To Evaluate Correctional Sentences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this