TY - JOUR
T1 - Using a model and empirical data to analyze manufactured home conservation retrofits
AU - Lee, Allen
AU - Englin, Jeffrey
N1 - Funding Information:
The researchr eportedh erewas fundedb y the BonnevilleP owerA dministratiotnh rough an interagencayg reemenwt ith the U.S. De-partmenot f Energy. The authorsw ouldlike to thank Sheila Riewer and KennethK eating for their supporta nd technicacl ontributions throughoutth e project.W e also recognizteh e analyticaslu pporpt rovidedb y DonaldH adley and William Monroe,P acificN orthwesLt abo-ratory,i n both the PRISM and cost analyses. Richard Goeltz, Oak Ridge NationalL abora-tory, and Karen Schoch,P acificPower, were very helpful in providinga nd interpretintgh e HRCP data. And we appreciatteh eassistance of MargaretF els and the PrincetonU niversity Centerf or Energya ndE nvironmentaSlt udies in providingth ePRISM model.
PY - 1989/2/10
Y1 - 1989/2/10
N2 - Approximately 600 of the 3200 homes participating in the Hood River Conservation Project (HRCP) were manufactured (mobile) homes. The variation in their thermal characteristics before and after retrofit allowed us to estimate the energy savings associated with specific energy conservation measures (ECMs). We used the PRISM model and an adjustment procedure to provide estimates of heating energy consumption. The estimated relationship between the heating consumption and the estimated design load coefficient (UA) was used to determine the space-heating energy savings associated with individual ECMs. We then developed cost-estimating relationships for each component based on HRCP data and used the estimated costs with the energy savings estimates to determine the levelized costs of retrofit measures. Levelized costs less than 4 ¢/kWh were considered to be cost-effective. The results indicated that ceiling retrofits were the most cost-effective way to save energy. On an incremental basis and assuming 30-year remaining lifetimes, ceiling insulation up to R-5.4 (m2 °C)/W was cost-effective. On an average basis, levels up to R-6.8 (where physically possible) were cost-effective. Floor insulation retrofits to R-2.5 were nearly cost-effective. The levelized costs of window retrofits, however, were substantially beyond cost-effective levels. The assumed lifetime of the home critically affected the cost-effectiveness of the retrofits: a 10-year lifetime increased levelized costs by a factor of about 2.5 over costs for a 30-year lifetime.
AB - Approximately 600 of the 3200 homes participating in the Hood River Conservation Project (HRCP) were manufactured (mobile) homes. The variation in their thermal characteristics before and after retrofit allowed us to estimate the energy savings associated with specific energy conservation measures (ECMs). We used the PRISM model and an adjustment procedure to provide estimates of heating energy consumption. The estimated relationship between the heating consumption and the estimated design load coefficient (UA) was used to determine the space-heating energy savings associated with individual ECMs. We then developed cost-estimating relationships for each component based on HRCP data and used the estimated costs with the energy savings estimates to determine the levelized costs of retrofit measures. Levelized costs less than 4 ¢/kWh were considered to be cost-effective. The results indicated that ceiling retrofits were the most cost-effective way to save energy. On an incremental basis and assuming 30-year remaining lifetimes, ceiling insulation up to R-5.4 (m2 °C)/W was cost-effective. On an average basis, levels up to R-6.8 (where physically possible) were cost-effective. Floor insulation retrofits to R-2.5 were nearly cost-effective. The levelized costs of window retrofits, however, were substantially beyond cost-effective levels. The assumed lifetime of the home critically affected the cost-effectiveness of the retrofits: a 10-year lifetime increased levelized costs by a factor of about 2.5 over costs for a 30-year lifetime.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024608839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024608839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0378-7788(89)90019-4
DO - 10.1016/0378-7788(89)90019-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0024608839
SN - 0378-7788
VL - 13
SP - 73
EP - 83
JO - Energy and Buildings
JF - Energy and Buildings
IS - 1
ER -