Understanding engineering students' professional pathways: A longitudinal mixed-methods study

Samantha Brunhaver, Holly M. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler, Sheri Sheppard, Cheryl Carrico, Angela Harris

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    According to data from the National Science Foundation (NSF), nearly two-thirds of engineering bachelor's graduates work in engineering fields immediately after college, while another 30 percent takes jobs in non-engineering fields.1 Prior work, however, shows that most engineering undergraduates are "unsure" about their future career direction, even in the months leading up to graduation,2 and little is known about how and why they eventually choose what to do. Furthermore, while several college-related factors have been linked to engineering students' initial career decisions, how these and other factors actively shape their initial career steps remains understudied. To address these gaps, we designed the NSF-funded Professional Engineering Pathways Study (PEPS), a three-year collaboration aimed at understanding and enhancing the process through which engineering undergraduates explore, select, and prepare for their chosen careers (NSFEEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). PEPS builds upon the rich tradition begun by two prior NSF-funded studies, the Academic Pathways Study (APS) and the Engineering Pathways Study (EPS), of using multi-institutional, mixed-methods research to delineate the experiences of engineering students and early career professionals. The project also features two components: the research component, and the community of practice component. The research component follows engineering students at six U.S. institutions through their junior or senior year, to examine how engineering students' career development and decision-making processes unfold over time. Also as part of this component, we are interviewing engineering faculty, student advisors, and career services staff about their perceptions of engineering students and the career resources provided to them on their campuses. The community of practice component focuses on bridging research-to-practice by engaging key stakeholders at the six partner institutions in data collection, interpretation, and dissemination activities. Outcomes from the study will include improving the career services and advising available to soon-to-be-degreed engineers at both these and other engineering schools. Currently in Year 2, we are analyzing our information-gathering interviews with faculty, advisors, and staff and sharing our initial findings with stakeholders at each of our six partner institutions for their feedback. In addition, we are preparing to conduct longitudinal surveys and interviews of junior and senior engineering students during the upcoming 2016-2017 academic year. This paper summarizes the work completed over Years 1-2, and provides background and details about the project.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publication2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
    PublisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education
    Volume2016-June
    StatePublished - Jun 26 2016
    Event123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - New Orleans, United States
    Duration: Jun 26 2016Jun 29 2016

    Other

    Other123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
    CountryUnited States
    CityNew Orleans
    Period6/26/166/29/16

    Fingerprint

    Students
    Decision making
    Feedback
    Engineers

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Engineering(all)

    Cite this

    Brunhaver, S., Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., Sheppard, S., Carrico, C., & Harris, A. (2016). Understanding engineering students' professional pathways: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Vol. 2016-June). American Society for Engineering Education.

    Understanding engineering students' professional pathways : A longitudinal mixed-methods study. / Brunhaver, Samantha; Matusovich, Holly M.; Streveler, Ruth A.; Sheppard, Sheri; Carrico, Cheryl; Harris, Angela.

    2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Brunhaver, S, Matusovich, HM, Streveler, RA, Sheppard, S, Carrico, C & Harris, A 2016, Understanding engineering students' professional pathways: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. vol. 2016-June, American Society for Engineering Education, 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, United States, 6/26/16.
    Brunhaver S, Matusovich HM, Streveler RA, Sheppard S, Carrico C, Harris A. Understanding engineering students' professional pathways: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June. American Society for Engineering Education. 2016
    Brunhaver, Samantha ; Matusovich, Holly M. ; Streveler, Ruth A. ; Sheppard, Sheri ; Carrico, Cheryl ; Harris, Angela. / Understanding engineering students' professional pathways : A longitudinal mixed-methods study. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.
    @inproceedings{c43e2a2909d248ca9e323ad2fcebd7e0,
    title = "Understanding engineering students' professional pathways: A longitudinal mixed-methods study",
    abstract = "According to data from the National Science Foundation (NSF), nearly two-thirds of engineering bachelor's graduates work in engineering fields immediately after college, while another 30 percent takes jobs in non-engineering fields.1 Prior work, however, shows that most engineering undergraduates are {"}unsure{"} about their future career direction, even in the months leading up to graduation,2 and little is known about how and why they eventually choose what to do. Furthermore, while several college-related factors have been linked to engineering students' initial career decisions, how these and other factors actively shape their initial career steps remains understudied. To address these gaps, we designed the NSF-funded Professional Engineering Pathways Study (PEPS), a three-year collaboration aimed at understanding and enhancing the process through which engineering undergraduates explore, select, and prepare for their chosen careers (NSFEEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). PEPS builds upon the rich tradition begun by two prior NSF-funded studies, the Academic Pathways Study (APS) and the Engineering Pathways Study (EPS), of using multi-institutional, mixed-methods research to delineate the experiences of engineering students and early career professionals. The project also features two components: the research component, and the community of practice component. The research component follows engineering students at six U.S. institutions through their junior or senior year, to examine how engineering students' career development and decision-making processes unfold over time. Also as part of this component, we are interviewing engineering faculty, student advisors, and career services staff about their perceptions of engineering students and the career resources provided to them on their campuses. The community of practice component focuses on bridging research-to-practice by engaging key stakeholders at the six partner institutions in data collection, interpretation, and dissemination activities. Outcomes from the study will include improving the career services and advising available to soon-to-be-degreed engineers at both these and other engineering schools. Currently in Year 2, we are analyzing our information-gathering interviews with faculty, advisors, and staff and sharing our initial findings with stakeholders at each of our six partner institutions for their feedback. In addition, we are preparing to conduct longitudinal surveys and interviews of junior and senior engineering students during the upcoming 2016-2017 academic year. This paper summarizes the work completed over Years 1-2, and provides background and details about the project.",
    author = "Samantha Brunhaver and Matusovich, {Holly M.} and Streveler, {Ruth A.} and Sheri Sheppard and Cheryl Carrico and Angela Harris",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    day = "26",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "2016-June",
    booktitle = "2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition",
    publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Understanding engineering students' professional pathways

    T2 - A longitudinal mixed-methods study

    AU - Brunhaver, Samantha

    AU - Matusovich, Holly M.

    AU - Streveler, Ruth A.

    AU - Sheppard, Sheri

    AU - Carrico, Cheryl

    AU - Harris, Angela

    PY - 2016/6/26

    Y1 - 2016/6/26

    N2 - According to data from the National Science Foundation (NSF), nearly two-thirds of engineering bachelor's graduates work in engineering fields immediately after college, while another 30 percent takes jobs in non-engineering fields.1 Prior work, however, shows that most engineering undergraduates are "unsure" about their future career direction, even in the months leading up to graduation,2 and little is known about how and why they eventually choose what to do. Furthermore, while several college-related factors have been linked to engineering students' initial career decisions, how these and other factors actively shape their initial career steps remains understudied. To address these gaps, we designed the NSF-funded Professional Engineering Pathways Study (PEPS), a three-year collaboration aimed at understanding and enhancing the process through which engineering undergraduates explore, select, and prepare for their chosen careers (NSFEEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). PEPS builds upon the rich tradition begun by two prior NSF-funded studies, the Academic Pathways Study (APS) and the Engineering Pathways Study (EPS), of using multi-institutional, mixed-methods research to delineate the experiences of engineering students and early career professionals. The project also features two components: the research component, and the community of practice component. The research component follows engineering students at six U.S. institutions through their junior or senior year, to examine how engineering students' career development and decision-making processes unfold over time. Also as part of this component, we are interviewing engineering faculty, student advisors, and career services staff about their perceptions of engineering students and the career resources provided to them on their campuses. The community of practice component focuses on bridging research-to-practice by engaging key stakeholders at the six partner institutions in data collection, interpretation, and dissemination activities. Outcomes from the study will include improving the career services and advising available to soon-to-be-degreed engineers at both these and other engineering schools. Currently in Year 2, we are analyzing our information-gathering interviews with faculty, advisors, and staff and sharing our initial findings with stakeholders at each of our six partner institutions for their feedback. In addition, we are preparing to conduct longitudinal surveys and interviews of junior and senior engineering students during the upcoming 2016-2017 academic year. This paper summarizes the work completed over Years 1-2, and provides background and details about the project.

    AB - According to data from the National Science Foundation (NSF), nearly two-thirds of engineering bachelor's graduates work in engineering fields immediately after college, while another 30 percent takes jobs in non-engineering fields.1 Prior work, however, shows that most engineering undergraduates are "unsure" about their future career direction, even in the months leading up to graduation,2 and little is known about how and why they eventually choose what to do. Furthermore, while several college-related factors have been linked to engineering students' initial career decisions, how these and other factors actively shape their initial career steps remains understudied. To address these gaps, we designed the NSF-funded Professional Engineering Pathways Study (PEPS), a three-year collaboration aimed at understanding and enhancing the process through which engineering undergraduates explore, select, and prepare for their chosen careers (NSFEEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). PEPS builds upon the rich tradition begun by two prior NSF-funded studies, the Academic Pathways Study (APS) and the Engineering Pathways Study (EPS), of using multi-institutional, mixed-methods research to delineate the experiences of engineering students and early career professionals. The project also features two components: the research component, and the community of practice component. The research component follows engineering students at six U.S. institutions through their junior or senior year, to examine how engineering students' career development and decision-making processes unfold over time. Also as part of this component, we are interviewing engineering faculty, student advisors, and career services staff about their perceptions of engineering students and the career resources provided to them on their campuses. The community of practice component focuses on bridging research-to-practice by engaging key stakeholders at the six partner institutions in data collection, interpretation, and dissemination activities. Outcomes from the study will include improving the career services and advising available to soon-to-be-degreed engineers at both these and other engineering schools. Currently in Year 2, we are analyzing our information-gathering interviews with faculty, advisors, and staff and sharing our initial findings with stakeholders at each of our six partner institutions for their feedback. In addition, we are preparing to conduct longitudinal surveys and interviews of junior and senior engineering students during the upcoming 2016-2017 academic year. This paper summarizes the work completed over Years 1-2, and provides background and details about the project.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983340603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983340603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference contribution

    AN - SCOPUS:84983340603

    VL - 2016-June

    BT - 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

    PB - American Society for Engineering Education

    ER -