Undergraduate student satisfaction and achievement at the GetWET observatory

A fluid learning experience at Colorado State University

Sara L. Rathburn, Andrea Weinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The GetWET Observatory was developed as part of an overall course redesign of the Introductory Geology Laboratory at Colorado State University to improve student learning of key surface and groundwater concepts for nonmajors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Consisting of six groundwater monitoring wells, the GetWET Observatory is adjacent to a gauged perennial creek on campus property. Students complete hands-on, field-based exercises related to surface and groundwater, with emphasis on local water quantity and quality. Overarching questions about the responsiveness of the curricular changes to student's needs were evaluated through a student perception survey. The effectiveness of student learning of key concepts of surface and groundwater was evaluated through pre- and post-knowledge assessments. Results of the perception survey indicate that the needs of students from all majors and colleges were equally met, that males report a higher rate of enjoyment of the GetWET experience than females, that weather plays an important role in student enjoyment, that modifications to the groundwater exercise focused the learning on larger concepts of surface and groundwater, and that student perceptions of the quality of the lesson increased with the curricular revision. Student responses indicate we have created an affirmative laboratory environment at the GetWET that supports positive student attitudes conducive to maximum learning. Students whose teaching assistant was a graduate student had much higher perceptions of the quality of the lab, higher satisfaction with the lab, higher perception of the quality of the lesson, and a better understanding of the relationship between themselves and ground and surface water. There was no significant difference in student knowledge baseline on pre-tests over three semesters of data collection. Mean gains in student scores between pre- and post-tests ranged from 0.63 to 0.76, with a 1.60 mean gain for a small number of laboratory sections taught by graduate teaching assistants who had more hydrogeological background. A decrease in student gain scores followed curricular revision along with a simultaneous significant increase in student's perception of the quality of the lesson. Additional data will be collected to determine if the decrease in gain scores is attributed to teaching assistant composition or a less effective laboratory exercise. Pre- and post-knowledge tests are also useful instruments for tracking basic groundwater knowledge of teaching assistants and their teaching effectiveness. Additional and ongoing training of all GEOL121 teaching assistants has strengthened the overall learning experience for undergraduates at the GetWET Observatory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-55
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Geoscience Education
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

student
observatory
learning
fluid
experience
teaching
assistant
groundwater
Teaching
graduate
water
mathematics
semester
geology
engineering
monitoring
weather
surface water
well

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{0223649af2cc485aab4fc49fdc98ddbc,
title = "Undergraduate student satisfaction and achievement at the GetWET observatory: A fluid learning experience at Colorado State University",
abstract = "The GetWET Observatory was developed as part of an overall course redesign of the Introductory Geology Laboratory at Colorado State University to improve student learning of key surface and groundwater concepts for nonmajors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Consisting of six groundwater monitoring wells, the GetWET Observatory is adjacent to a gauged perennial creek on campus property. Students complete hands-on, field-based exercises related to surface and groundwater, with emphasis on local water quantity and quality. Overarching questions about the responsiveness of the curricular changes to student's needs were evaluated through a student perception survey. The effectiveness of student learning of key concepts of surface and groundwater was evaluated through pre- and post-knowledge assessments. Results of the perception survey indicate that the needs of students from all majors and colleges were equally met, that males report a higher rate of enjoyment of the GetWET experience than females, that weather plays an important role in student enjoyment, that modifications to the groundwater exercise focused the learning on larger concepts of surface and groundwater, and that student perceptions of the quality of the lesson increased with the curricular revision. Student responses indicate we have created an affirmative laboratory environment at the GetWET that supports positive student attitudes conducive to maximum learning. Students whose teaching assistant was a graduate student had much higher perceptions of the quality of the lab, higher satisfaction with the lab, higher perception of the quality of the lesson, and a better understanding of the relationship between themselves and ground and surface water. There was no significant difference in student knowledge baseline on pre-tests over three semesters of data collection. Mean gains in student scores between pre- and post-tests ranged from 0.63 to 0.76, with a 1.60 mean gain for a small number of laboratory sections taught by graduate teaching assistants who had more hydrogeological background. A decrease in student gain scores followed curricular revision along with a simultaneous significant increase in student's perception of the quality of the lesson. Additional data will be collected to determine if the decrease in gain scores is attributed to teaching assistant composition or a less effective laboratory exercise. Pre- and post-knowledge tests are also useful instruments for tracking basic groundwater knowledge of teaching assistants and their teaching effectiveness. Additional and ongoing training of all GEOL121 teaching assistants has strengthened the overall learning experience for undergraduates at the GetWET Observatory.",
author = "Rathburn, {Sara L.} and Andrea Weinberg",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5408/1.3543936a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "47--55",
journal = "Journal of Geoscience Education",
issn = "1089-9995",
publisher = "National Association of Geoscience Teachers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undergraduate student satisfaction and achievement at the GetWET observatory

T2 - A fluid learning experience at Colorado State University

AU - Rathburn, Sara L.

AU - Weinberg, Andrea

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The GetWET Observatory was developed as part of an overall course redesign of the Introductory Geology Laboratory at Colorado State University to improve student learning of key surface and groundwater concepts for nonmajors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Consisting of six groundwater monitoring wells, the GetWET Observatory is adjacent to a gauged perennial creek on campus property. Students complete hands-on, field-based exercises related to surface and groundwater, with emphasis on local water quantity and quality. Overarching questions about the responsiveness of the curricular changes to student's needs were evaluated through a student perception survey. The effectiveness of student learning of key concepts of surface and groundwater was evaluated through pre- and post-knowledge assessments. Results of the perception survey indicate that the needs of students from all majors and colleges were equally met, that males report a higher rate of enjoyment of the GetWET experience than females, that weather plays an important role in student enjoyment, that modifications to the groundwater exercise focused the learning on larger concepts of surface and groundwater, and that student perceptions of the quality of the lesson increased with the curricular revision. Student responses indicate we have created an affirmative laboratory environment at the GetWET that supports positive student attitudes conducive to maximum learning. Students whose teaching assistant was a graduate student had much higher perceptions of the quality of the lab, higher satisfaction with the lab, higher perception of the quality of the lesson, and a better understanding of the relationship between themselves and ground and surface water. There was no significant difference in student knowledge baseline on pre-tests over three semesters of data collection. Mean gains in student scores between pre- and post-tests ranged from 0.63 to 0.76, with a 1.60 mean gain for a small number of laboratory sections taught by graduate teaching assistants who had more hydrogeological background. A decrease in student gain scores followed curricular revision along with a simultaneous significant increase in student's perception of the quality of the lesson. Additional data will be collected to determine if the decrease in gain scores is attributed to teaching assistant composition or a less effective laboratory exercise. Pre- and post-knowledge tests are also useful instruments for tracking basic groundwater knowledge of teaching assistants and their teaching effectiveness. Additional and ongoing training of all GEOL121 teaching assistants has strengthened the overall learning experience for undergraduates at the GetWET Observatory.

AB - The GetWET Observatory was developed as part of an overall course redesign of the Introductory Geology Laboratory at Colorado State University to improve student learning of key surface and groundwater concepts for nonmajors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Consisting of six groundwater monitoring wells, the GetWET Observatory is adjacent to a gauged perennial creek on campus property. Students complete hands-on, field-based exercises related to surface and groundwater, with emphasis on local water quantity and quality. Overarching questions about the responsiveness of the curricular changes to student's needs were evaluated through a student perception survey. The effectiveness of student learning of key concepts of surface and groundwater was evaluated through pre- and post-knowledge assessments. Results of the perception survey indicate that the needs of students from all majors and colleges were equally met, that males report a higher rate of enjoyment of the GetWET experience than females, that weather plays an important role in student enjoyment, that modifications to the groundwater exercise focused the learning on larger concepts of surface and groundwater, and that student perceptions of the quality of the lesson increased with the curricular revision. Student responses indicate we have created an affirmative laboratory environment at the GetWET that supports positive student attitudes conducive to maximum learning. Students whose teaching assistant was a graduate student had much higher perceptions of the quality of the lab, higher satisfaction with the lab, higher perception of the quality of the lesson, and a better understanding of the relationship between themselves and ground and surface water. There was no significant difference in student knowledge baseline on pre-tests over three semesters of data collection. Mean gains in student scores between pre- and post-tests ranged from 0.63 to 0.76, with a 1.60 mean gain for a small number of laboratory sections taught by graduate teaching assistants who had more hydrogeological background. A decrease in student gain scores followed curricular revision along with a simultaneous significant increase in student's perception of the quality of the lesson. Additional data will be collected to determine if the decrease in gain scores is attributed to teaching assistant composition or a less effective laboratory exercise. Pre- and post-knowledge tests are also useful instruments for tracking basic groundwater knowledge of teaching assistants and their teaching effectiveness. Additional and ongoing training of all GEOL121 teaching assistants has strengthened the overall learning experience for undergraduates at the GetWET Observatory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856204474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856204474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5408/1.3543936a

DO - 10.5408/1.3543936a

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 47

EP - 55

JO - Journal of Geoscience Education

JF - Journal of Geoscience Education

SN - 1089-9995

IS - 2

ER -