Abstract
We modify the behavioural postulate of self-centred inequity aversion to explain producers' reluctance to fund generic fruit and vegetable advertising as a result of experiencing negative utility when others benefit more from a public good than themselves, but positive utility when they earn more than others. We find that higher variability in returns decreases the probability of a favourable vote. Conversely, if information about payoffs is incomplete, if subjects are allowed to experience a trial run of a generic advertising programme, if returns are equal across producers, or if there is government support for the programme, the likelihood of approval rises.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 473-497 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | European Review of Agricultural Economics |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2015 |
Keywords
- Experimental economics
- Generic advertising
- Inequity aversion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics