Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response).

Thomas Seager, F. Kyle Satterstrom, Igor Linkov, Seth P. Tuler, Rebecca Kay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intensification of interest in environmental assessment during the last 2 decades has driven corporate efforts to better document environmental goals, improve environmental management systems, and increase awareness of the environmental and ecological effects of business operations. This trend has been motivated partly by regulatory requirements (such as the Toxics Release Inventory in the United States) and partly by the inclination of some large manufacturing firms to embrace a broader social and environmental mission characterized as "sustainability" or "ecoefficiency." Moreover, the importance of measurable objectives in the US government has been recognized at least since the Government Performance Results Act of 1993, which was intended to both improve the efficiency of government and the confidence of the American public in government managers. However, in management of environmental crises - such as catastrophic oil or chemical spills - development of measurable performance standards has lagged. Consequently, government spill managers are unable to define success in terms that are easily communicated to public and other stakeholder groups, and they could be disadvantaged in their efforts to deploy response resources with maximum efficiency. In this paper, we present a typological review of environmental assessment measures and summarize some of the current practices and strategic goals among federal agencies with regard to oil and chemical spills. A general approach to organizing metrics for oil spill response, restoration, and recovery is also presented. The results could improve planning efforts and communication among different federal, state, and local agencies and public or stakeholder groups involved in spill management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-321
Number of pages12
JournalIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Petroleum Pollution
oil spill response
performance
environmental assessment
stakeholder
manager
efficiency
performance standard
oil
Poisons
federal state
Vulnerable Populations
environmental management
management
restoration
Oils
manufacturing
Group
confidence
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response). / Seager, Thomas; Satterstrom, F. Kyle; Linkov, Igor; Tuler, Seth P.; Kay, Rebecca.

In: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, 07.2007, p. 310-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seager, Thomas ; Satterstrom, F. Kyle ; Linkov, Igor ; Tuler, Seth P. ; Kay, Rebecca. / Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response). In: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2007 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 310-321.
@article{e4350dcb053147f586ec766a2c330dec,
title = "Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response).",
abstract = "An intensification of interest in environmental assessment during the last 2 decades has driven corporate efforts to better document environmental goals, improve environmental management systems, and increase awareness of the environmental and ecological effects of business operations. This trend has been motivated partly by regulatory requirements (such as the Toxics Release Inventory in the United States) and partly by the inclination of some large manufacturing firms to embrace a broader social and environmental mission characterized as {"}sustainability{"} or {"}ecoefficiency.{"} Moreover, the importance of measurable objectives in the US government has been recognized at least since the Government Performance Results Act of 1993, which was intended to both improve the efficiency of government and the confidence of the American public in government managers. However, in management of environmental crises - such as catastrophic oil or chemical spills - development of measurable performance standards has lagged. Consequently, government spill managers are unable to define success in terms that are easily communicated to public and other stakeholder groups, and they could be disadvantaged in their efforts to deploy response resources with maximum efficiency. In this paper, we present a typological review of environmental assessment measures and summarize some of the current practices and strategic goals among federal agencies with regard to oil and chemical spills. A general approach to organizing metrics for oil spill response, restoration, and recovery is also presented. The results could improve planning efforts and communication among different federal, state, and local agencies and public or stakeholder groups involved in spill management.",
author = "Thomas Seager and Satterstrom, {F. Kyle} and Igor Linkov and Tuler, {Seth P.} and Rebecca Kay",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1897/1551-3793(2007)3[310:TROEPM]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "310--321",
journal = "Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management",
issn = "1551-3793",
publisher = "SETAC Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Typological review of environmental performance metrics (with illustrative examples for oil spill response).

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Satterstrom, F. Kyle

AU - Linkov, Igor

AU - Tuler, Seth P.

AU - Kay, Rebecca

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - An intensification of interest in environmental assessment during the last 2 decades has driven corporate efforts to better document environmental goals, improve environmental management systems, and increase awareness of the environmental and ecological effects of business operations. This trend has been motivated partly by regulatory requirements (such as the Toxics Release Inventory in the United States) and partly by the inclination of some large manufacturing firms to embrace a broader social and environmental mission characterized as "sustainability" or "ecoefficiency." Moreover, the importance of measurable objectives in the US government has been recognized at least since the Government Performance Results Act of 1993, which was intended to both improve the efficiency of government and the confidence of the American public in government managers. However, in management of environmental crises - such as catastrophic oil or chemical spills - development of measurable performance standards has lagged. Consequently, government spill managers are unable to define success in terms that are easily communicated to public and other stakeholder groups, and they could be disadvantaged in their efforts to deploy response resources with maximum efficiency. In this paper, we present a typological review of environmental assessment measures and summarize some of the current practices and strategic goals among federal agencies with regard to oil and chemical spills. A general approach to organizing metrics for oil spill response, restoration, and recovery is also presented. The results could improve planning efforts and communication among different federal, state, and local agencies and public or stakeholder groups involved in spill management.

AB - An intensification of interest in environmental assessment during the last 2 decades has driven corporate efforts to better document environmental goals, improve environmental management systems, and increase awareness of the environmental and ecological effects of business operations. This trend has been motivated partly by regulatory requirements (such as the Toxics Release Inventory in the United States) and partly by the inclination of some large manufacturing firms to embrace a broader social and environmental mission characterized as "sustainability" or "ecoefficiency." Moreover, the importance of measurable objectives in the US government has been recognized at least since the Government Performance Results Act of 1993, which was intended to both improve the efficiency of government and the confidence of the American public in government managers. However, in management of environmental crises - such as catastrophic oil or chemical spills - development of measurable performance standards has lagged. Consequently, government spill managers are unable to define success in terms that are easily communicated to public and other stakeholder groups, and they could be disadvantaged in their efforts to deploy response resources with maximum efficiency. In this paper, we present a typological review of environmental assessment measures and summarize some of the current practices and strategic goals among federal agencies with regard to oil and chemical spills. A general approach to organizing metrics for oil spill response, restoration, and recovery is also presented. The results could improve planning efforts and communication among different federal, state, and local agencies and public or stakeholder groups involved in spill management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35248856551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35248856551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1897/1551-3793(2007)3[310:TROEPM]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1897/1551-3793(2007)3[310:TROEPM]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

C2 - 17695104

AN - SCOPUS:35248856551

VL - 3

SP - 310

EP - 321

JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

JF - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

SN - 1551-3793

IS - 3

ER -