TY - JOUR
T1 - Tutorial
T2 - practical considerations for tissue clearing and imaging
AU - Weiss, Kurt R.
AU - Voigt, Fabian F.
AU - Shepherd, Douglas P.
AU - Huisken, Jan
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank J. Liu, A. Glaser, P. Ariel, D. Richardson, F. Helmchen, R. Power and the Huisken lab for their comments and discussion on the manuscript. Illustrations for Figs. 1 and 3 were done by M. Neufeld (madyrose.com). The Circos133 data visualization tool was used to generate Fig. 2. Blender (www.blender.org) was used for rendering Fig. 4. Brain tissue samples displayed in Fig. 3 were provided by L. Egolf, D. Kirschenbaum, F. Catto, P. Perin, K. Le Corf and A. Frick. We also thank the UW-Madison tissue clearing group and all those who provided inspiration, insight and samples: M. Taylor, R. Sulllivan, E. Dent, R. Taylor, K. Chan, R. Salamon and N. Iyer. We acknowledge funding by the Morgridge Institute for Research and the NIH (R01OD026219).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Tissue clearing has become a powerful technique for studying anatomy and morphology at scales ranging from entire organisms to subcellular features. With the recent proliferation of tissue-clearing methods and imaging options, it can be challenging to determine the best clearing protocol for a particular tissue and experimental question. The fact that so many clearing protocols exist suggests there is no one-size-fits-all approach to tissue clearing and imaging. Even in cases where a basic level of clearing has been achieved, there are many factors to consider, including signal retention, staining (labeling), uniformity of transparency, image acquisition and analysis. Despite reviews citing features of clearing protocols, it is often unknown a priori whether a protocol will work for a given experiment, and thus some optimization is required by the end user. In addition, the capabilities of available imaging setups often dictate how the sample needs to be prepared. After imaging, careful evaluation of volumetric image data is required for each combination of clearing protocol, tissue type, biological marker, imaging modality and biological question. Rather than providing a direct comparison of the many clearing methods and applications available, in this tutorial we address common pitfalls and provide guidelines for designing, optimizing and imaging in a successful tissue-clearing experiment with a focus on light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM).
AB - Tissue clearing has become a powerful technique for studying anatomy and morphology at scales ranging from entire organisms to subcellular features. With the recent proliferation of tissue-clearing methods and imaging options, it can be challenging to determine the best clearing protocol for a particular tissue and experimental question. The fact that so many clearing protocols exist suggests there is no one-size-fits-all approach to tissue clearing and imaging. Even in cases where a basic level of clearing has been achieved, there are many factors to consider, including signal retention, staining (labeling), uniformity of transparency, image acquisition and analysis. Despite reviews citing features of clearing protocols, it is often unknown a priori whether a protocol will work for a given experiment, and thus some optimization is required by the end user. In addition, the capabilities of available imaging setups often dictate how the sample needs to be prepared. After imaging, careful evaluation of volumetric image data is required for each combination of clearing protocol, tissue type, biological marker, imaging modality and biological question. Rather than providing a direct comparison of the many clearing methods and applications available, in this tutorial we address common pitfalls and provide guidelines for designing, optimizing and imaging in a successful tissue-clearing experiment with a focus on light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106287186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106287186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41596-021-00502-8
DO - 10.1038/s41596-021-00502-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34021294
AN - SCOPUS:85106287186
SN - 1754-2189
VL - 16
SP - 2732
EP - 2748
JO - Nature Protocols
JF - Nature Protocols
IS - 6
ER -