28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars and policy-makers have expressed concerns about the crediting of coauthors in research publications. Most such problems fall into one of two categories, excluding deserving contributors or including undeserving ones. But our research shows that there is no consensus on “deserving” or on what type of contribution suffices for co-authorship award. Our study uses qualitative data, including interviews with 60 US academic science or engineering researchers in 14 disciplines in a set of geographically distributed research-intensive universities. We also employ data from 161 website posts provided by 93 study participants, again US academic scientists. We examine a variety of factors related to perceived unwarranted exclusion from co-author credit and unwarranted inclusion, providing an empirically-informed conceptual model to explain co-author crediting outcomes. Determinants of outcomes include characteristics of disciplines and fields, institutional work culture, power dynamics and team-specific norms and decision processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Nov 14 2015

Fingerprint

Authoring
Conceptual Model
Research
work culture
Authorship
Determinant
Inclusion
Engineering
Administrative Personnel
Norm
Publications
website
Websites
credit
exclusion
inclusion
Research Personnel
Interviews
determinants
engineering

Keywords

  • Co-authorship
  • Contributorship
  • Ghost authors
  • Guest author
  • Research collaboration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Trouble in Paradise : Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring. / Bozeman, Barry; Youtie, Jan.

In: Science and Engineering Ethics, 14.11.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c52335d1e8794f1abd253f35ab7eb492,
title = "Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring",
abstract = "Scholars and policy-makers have expressed concerns about the crediting of coauthors in research publications. Most such problems fall into one of two categories, excluding deserving contributors or including undeserving ones. But our research shows that there is no consensus on “deserving” or on what type of contribution suffices for co-authorship award. Our study uses qualitative data, including interviews with 60 US academic science or engineering researchers in 14 disciplines in a set of geographically distributed research-intensive universities. We also employ data from 161 website posts provided by 93 study participants, again US academic scientists. We examine a variety of factors related to perceived unwarranted exclusion from co-author credit and unwarranted inclusion, providing an empirically-informed conceptual model to explain co-author crediting outcomes. Determinants of outcomes include characteristics of disciplines and fields, institutional work culture, power dynamics and team-specific norms and decision processes.",
keywords = "Co-authorship, Contributorship, Ghost authors, Guest author, Research collaboration",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Jan Youtie",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics",
issn = "1660-5446",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trouble in Paradise

T2 - Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Youtie, Jan

PY - 2015/11/14

Y1 - 2015/11/14

N2 - Scholars and policy-makers have expressed concerns about the crediting of coauthors in research publications. Most such problems fall into one of two categories, excluding deserving contributors or including undeserving ones. But our research shows that there is no consensus on “deserving” or on what type of contribution suffices for co-authorship award. Our study uses qualitative data, including interviews with 60 US academic science or engineering researchers in 14 disciplines in a set of geographically distributed research-intensive universities. We also employ data from 161 website posts provided by 93 study participants, again US academic scientists. We examine a variety of factors related to perceived unwarranted exclusion from co-author credit and unwarranted inclusion, providing an empirically-informed conceptual model to explain co-author crediting outcomes. Determinants of outcomes include characteristics of disciplines and fields, institutional work culture, power dynamics and team-specific norms and decision processes.

AB - Scholars and policy-makers have expressed concerns about the crediting of coauthors in research publications. Most such problems fall into one of two categories, excluding deserving contributors or including undeserving ones. But our research shows that there is no consensus on “deserving” or on what type of contribution suffices for co-authorship award. Our study uses qualitative data, including interviews with 60 US academic science or engineering researchers in 14 disciplines in a set of geographically distributed research-intensive universities. We also employ data from 161 website posts provided by 93 study participants, again US academic scientists. We examine a variety of factors related to perceived unwarranted exclusion from co-author credit and unwarranted inclusion, providing an empirically-informed conceptual model to explain co-author crediting outcomes. Determinants of outcomes include characteristics of disciplines and fields, institutional work culture, power dynamics and team-specific norms and decision processes.

KW - Co-authorship

KW - Contributorship

KW - Ghost authors

KW - Guest author

KW - Research collaboration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947087361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947087361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5

DO - 10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 26573303

AN - SCOPUS:84947087361

JO - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

JF - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

SN - 1660-5446

ER -