Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Like all technologies, nanotechnology will inevitably present risks, whether they result from unintentional effects of otherwise beneficial applications, or from the malevolent misuse of technology. Increasingly, risks from new and emerging technologies are being regulated at the international level, although governments and private experts are only beginning to consider the appropriate international responses to nanotechnology. In this paper, we explore both the potential risks posed by nanotechnology and potential regulatory frameworks that law may impose. In so doing, we also explore the various rationales for international regulation including the potential for cross-boundary harms, sharing of regulatory expertise and resources, controlling protectionism and trade conflicts, avoiding a "race to the bottom" in which governments seek economic advantage through lax regulation, and limiting the "nano divide" between North and South. Finally, we examine some models for international regulation and offer tentative thoughts on the prospects for each.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)714-725
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Nanotechnology
nanotechnology
Technology
regulation
framework law
protectionism
Economics
expertise
expert
resources
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology. / Marchant, Gary; Sylvester, Douglas.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 12.2006, p. 714-725.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf02d49df91449e8a301c4df14da6968,
title = "Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology",
abstract = "Like all technologies, nanotechnology will inevitably present risks, whether they result from unintentional effects of otherwise beneficial applications, or from the malevolent misuse of technology. Increasingly, risks from new and emerging technologies are being regulated at the international level, although governments and private experts are only beginning to consider the appropriate international responses to nanotechnology. In this paper, we explore both the potential risks posed by nanotechnology and potential regulatory frameworks that law may impose. In so doing, we also explore the various rationales for international regulation including the potential for cross-boundary harms, sharing of regulatory expertise and resources, controlling protectionism and trade conflicts, avoiding a {"}race to the bottom{"} in which governments seek economic advantage through lax regulation, and limiting the {"}nano divide{"} between North and South. Finally, we examine some models for international regulation and offer tentative thoughts on the prospects for each.",
author = "Gary Marchant and Douglas Sylvester",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00091.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "714--725",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology

AU - Marchant, Gary

AU - Sylvester, Douglas

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Like all technologies, nanotechnology will inevitably present risks, whether they result from unintentional effects of otherwise beneficial applications, or from the malevolent misuse of technology. Increasingly, risks from new and emerging technologies are being regulated at the international level, although governments and private experts are only beginning to consider the appropriate international responses to nanotechnology. In this paper, we explore both the potential risks posed by nanotechnology and potential regulatory frameworks that law may impose. In so doing, we also explore the various rationales for international regulation including the potential for cross-boundary harms, sharing of regulatory expertise and resources, controlling protectionism and trade conflicts, avoiding a "race to the bottom" in which governments seek economic advantage through lax regulation, and limiting the "nano divide" between North and South. Finally, we examine some models for international regulation and offer tentative thoughts on the prospects for each.

AB - Like all technologies, nanotechnology will inevitably present risks, whether they result from unintentional effects of otherwise beneficial applications, or from the malevolent misuse of technology. Increasingly, risks from new and emerging technologies are being regulated at the international level, although governments and private experts are only beginning to consider the appropriate international responses to nanotechnology. In this paper, we explore both the potential risks posed by nanotechnology and potential regulatory frameworks that law may impose. In so doing, we also explore the various rationales for international regulation including the potential for cross-boundary harms, sharing of regulatory expertise and resources, controlling protectionism and trade conflicts, avoiding a "race to the bottom" in which governments seek economic advantage through lax regulation, and limiting the "nano divide" between North and South. Finally, we examine some models for international regulation and offer tentative thoughts on the prospects for each.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751211183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751211183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00091.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00091.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 714

EP - 725

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 4

ER -