Towards an argumentative grammar for networking: a case of coordinating two approaches

Michal Tabach, Chris Rasmussen, Tommy Dreyfus, Naneh Apkarian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The networking of theories is an increasingly common and powerful approach to analyzing complex phenomena such as learning processes in classrooms. In this paper, we aim to advance the theoretical coordination of two approaches that we have previously combined to analyze individual, small group, and whole class mathematical progress. The theoretical advances we make are twofold. First, we identify and illuminate environmental and internal-theoretical commonalities across the two approaches, commonalities that contribute to the productivity of networking. Second, we propose an argumentative grammar for the networking, thus elevating the methodological logic and rationale of networking in this case and potentially in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-155
Number of pages17
JournalEducational Studies in Mathematics
Volume103
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Argumentative grammar
  • Classroom learning
  • Internal-theoretical commonalities
  • Networking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics(all)
  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Towards an argumentative grammar for networking: a case of coordinating two approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this