Abstract

Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students’ essays are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages628-629
Number of pages2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Event9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016 - Raleigh, United States
Duration: Jun 29 2016Jul 2 2016

Conference

Conference9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016
CountryUnited States
CityRaleigh
Period6/29/167/2/16

Fingerprint

Feedback
Linguistics
Students

Keywords

  • Automated writing evaluation
  • Feedback
  • Intelligent tutoring systems
  • Natural language processing
  • Revising
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems

Cite this

Roscoe, R., Jacovina, M. E., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A. C., & McNamara, D. (2016). Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation. 628-629. Paper presented at 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016, Raleigh, United States.

Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation. / Roscoe, Rod; Jacovina, Matthew E.; Allen, Laura K.; Johnson, Adam C.; McNamara, Danielle.

2016. 628-629 Paper presented at 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016, Raleigh, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Roscoe, R, Jacovina, ME, Allen, LK, Johnson, AC & McNamara, D 2016, 'Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation' Paper presented at 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016, Raleigh, United States, 6/29/16 - 7/2/16, pp. 628-629.
Roscoe R, Jacovina ME, Allen LK, Johnson AC, McNamara D. Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation. 2016. Paper presented at 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016, Raleigh, United States.
Roscoe, Rod ; Jacovina, Matthew E. ; Allen, Laura K. ; Johnson, Adam C. ; McNamara, Danielle. / Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation. Paper presented at 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016, Raleigh, United States.2 p.
@conference{b30579ed3c41481bae98c5aeebb5e518,
title = "Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation",
abstract = "Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students’ essays are discussed.",
keywords = "Automated writing evaluation, Feedback, Intelligent tutoring systems, Natural language processing, Revising, Writing",
author = "Rod Roscoe and Jacovina, {Matthew E.} and Allen, {Laura K.} and Johnson, {Adam C.} and Danielle McNamara",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "628--629",
note = "9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016 ; Conference date: 29-06-2016 Through 02-07-2016",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Toward revision-sensitive feedback in automated writing evaluation

AU - Roscoe, Rod

AU - Jacovina, Matthew E.

AU - Allen, Laura K.

AU - Johnson, Adam C.

AU - McNamara, Danielle

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students’ essays are discussed.

AB - Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students’ essays are discussed.

KW - Automated writing evaluation

KW - Feedback

KW - Intelligent tutoring systems

KW - Natural language processing

KW - Revising

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052012212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052012212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85052012212

SP - 628

EP - 629

ER -