The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension

Jeffery D. Houghton, Christopher Neck, Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the past two decades, conceptual and empirical research on the concept of workplace spirituality has increased and expanded significantly. An early and influential article by Krishnakumar and Neck (2002, Journal of Managerial Psychology 17 (3): 153–164) helped provide direction and structure to the nascent field of workplace spirituality by examining the “what” – the definitions and meanings of multiple views of workplace spirituality, the “why” – the potential benefits for organizations from encouraging such differing views of workplace spirituality among their members, and the “how” – the ways in which spirituality may be encouraged or implemented within organizations. The current paper provides a retrospective update and extension of the Krishnakumar and Neck (2002) “what, why, and how” framework and “spiritual freedom” model. More specifically, the paper reviews the development and expansion of the workplace spirituality literature over the past decade and a half and considers the potential contributions of a number of contemporary leadership approaches including self-leadership, shared leadership, and authentic leadership to spirituality in the workplace. The paper concludes with an examination of key directions for future research in the workplace spirituality domain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-205
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Management, Spirituality and Religion
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Keywords

  • Spirituality
  • leadership
  • organizational outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this