The scope of fisheries learning exchanges for conservation

Lekelia Jenkins, Katie R. Thompson, Luis Bourillon, S. Hoyt Peckham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past decade, fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs), in which representatives from different fisher communities come together to share marine conservation challenges and solutions, have been produced by a range of non-government organizations (NGOs) and federal agencies. This paper presents an overview of the history and scope of FLEs. A literature review, questionnaire, expert workshop, and key informant interviews were conducted. A content analysis was performed of the key informant interviews using a grounded theory approach. This paper offers a formal definition of a FLE, describes different configurations of FLEs, discusses the utility, common objectives, and common outcomes of FLEs, and outlines a research agenda for future work on FLEs. Organizers have found FLEs to have four main utilities: 1) FLEs leverage peer-to-peer sharing so that participants open each other's horizons for improving fisheries and fishing 2) FLEs catalyze and speed change, 3) FLEs are good for sharing thoughts that are difficult to receive and accept, 4) FLEs facilitate involvement and commitment from relevant parties needed for change. The most commonly documented purposes of FLEs were related to marine reserves, fisheries management strategies, bycatch reduction, and alternative livelihoods to fishing. The most common objectives among the FLEs surveyed were to encourage action or behavior, to openly exchange ideas, and to introduce new technology. As a result of FLEs the common outcomes were that participants were inspired to make changes, new programs were implemented, relationships were built and connections made, and participants enhanced their understanding of marine management strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMarine Policy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 11 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fishery
learning
conservation
fisheries
Fisheries
Conservation
peers
goods exchange
interviews
fishing
marine park
bycatch
livelihood
fishery management
literature review
fisheries management
interview
management
grounded theory
new technology

Keywords

  • Fisheries learning exchanges
  • Fisheries management
  • Knowledge exchange
  • Marine conservation
  • Natural resources management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Law
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The scope of fisheries learning exchanges for conservation. / Jenkins, Lekelia; Thompson, Katie R.; Bourillon, Luis; Peckham, S. Hoyt.

In: Marine Policy, 11.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jenkins, Lekelia ; Thompson, Katie R. ; Bourillon, Luis ; Peckham, S. Hoyt. / The scope of fisheries learning exchanges for conservation. In: Marine Policy. 2016.
@article{285988a3e6e346138ee4cf6c1e394055,
title = "The scope of fisheries learning exchanges for conservation",
abstract = "Over the past decade, fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs), in which representatives from different fisher communities come together to share marine conservation challenges and solutions, have been produced by a range of non-government organizations (NGOs) and federal agencies. This paper presents an overview of the history and scope of FLEs. A literature review, questionnaire, expert workshop, and key informant interviews were conducted. A content analysis was performed of the key informant interviews using a grounded theory approach. This paper offers a formal definition of a FLE, describes different configurations of FLEs, discusses the utility, common objectives, and common outcomes of FLEs, and outlines a research agenda for future work on FLEs. Organizers have found FLEs to have four main utilities: 1) FLEs leverage peer-to-peer sharing so that participants open each other's horizons for improving fisheries and fishing 2) FLEs catalyze and speed change, 3) FLEs are good for sharing thoughts that are difficult to receive and accept, 4) FLEs facilitate involvement and commitment from relevant parties needed for change. The most commonly documented purposes of FLEs were related to marine reserves, fisheries management strategies, bycatch reduction, and alternative livelihoods to fishing. The most common objectives among the FLEs surveyed were to encourage action or behavior, to openly exchange ideas, and to introduce new technology. As a result of FLEs the common outcomes were that participants were inspired to make changes, new programs were implemented, relationships were built and connections made, and participants enhanced their understanding of marine management strategies.",
keywords = "Fisheries learning exchanges, Fisheries management, Knowledge exchange, Marine conservation, Natural resources management",
author = "Lekelia Jenkins and Thompson, {Katie R.} and Luis Bourillon and Peckham, {S. Hoyt}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.025",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scope of fisheries learning exchanges for conservation

AU - Jenkins, Lekelia

AU - Thompson, Katie R.

AU - Bourillon, Luis

AU - Peckham, S. Hoyt

PY - 2016/5/11

Y1 - 2016/5/11

N2 - Over the past decade, fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs), in which representatives from different fisher communities come together to share marine conservation challenges and solutions, have been produced by a range of non-government organizations (NGOs) and federal agencies. This paper presents an overview of the history and scope of FLEs. A literature review, questionnaire, expert workshop, and key informant interviews were conducted. A content analysis was performed of the key informant interviews using a grounded theory approach. This paper offers a formal definition of a FLE, describes different configurations of FLEs, discusses the utility, common objectives, and common outcomes of FLEs, and outlines a research agenda for future work on FLEs. Organizers have found FLEs to have four main utilities: 1) FLEs leverage peer-to-peer sharing so that participants open each other's horizons for improving fisheries and fishing 2) FLEs catalyze and speed change, 3) FLEs are good for sharing thoughts that are difficult to receive and accept, 4) FLEs facilitate involvement and commitment from relevant parties needed for change. The most commonly documented purposes of FLEs were related to marine reserves, fisheries management strategies, bycatch reduction, and alternative livelihoods to fishing. The most common objectives among the FLEs surveyed were to encourage action or behavior, to openly exchange ideas, and to introduce new technology. As a result of FLEs the common outcomes were that participants were inspired to make changes, new programs were implemented, relationships were built and connections made, and participants enhanced their understanding of marine management strategies.

AB - Over the past decade, fisheries learning exchanges (FLEs), in which representatives from different fisher communities come together to share marine conservation challenges and solutions, have been produced by a range of non-government organizations (NGOs) and federal agencies. This paper presents an overview of the history and scope of FLEs. A literature review, questionnaire, expert workshop, and key informant interviews were conducted. A content analysis was performed of the key informant interviews using a grounded theory approach. This paper offers a formal definition of a FLE, describes different configurations of FLEs, discusses the utility, common objectives, and common outcomes of FLEs, and outlines a research agenda for future work on FLEs. Organizers have found FLEs to have four main utilities: 1) FLEs leverage peer-to-peer sharing so that participants open each other's horizons for improving fisheries and fishing 2) FLEs catalyze and speed change, 3) FLEs are good for sharing thoughts that are difficult to receive and accept, 4) FLEs facilitate involvement and commitment from relevant parties needed for change. The most commonly documented purposes of FLEs were related to marine reserves, fisheries management strategies, bycatch reduction, and alternative livelihoods to fishing. The most common objectives among the FLEs surveyed were to encourage action or behavior, to openly exchange ideas, and to introduce new technology. As a result of FLEs the common outcomes were that participants were inspired to make changes, new programs were implemented, relationships were built and connections made, and participants enhanced their understanding of marine management strategies.

KW - Fisheries learning exchanges

KW - Fisheries management

KW - Knowledge exchange

KW - Marine conservation

KW - Natural resources management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971671173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971671173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.025

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.025

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971671173

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -