The Narrative Waltz: The Role of Flexibility in Writing Proficiency

Laura K. Allen, Erica L. Snow, Danielle McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality writing is typically associated with decreased levels of text narrativity and readability. In this study, the authors present the hypothesis that writing proficiency is associated with an individual's flexible use of linguistic properties, rather than simply the consistent use of a particular set of linguistic properties. To test this hypothesis, the authors leveraged both natural language processing and dynamic methodologies to capture variability in students' use of narrative style across multiple essay prompts. Forty-five high school students wrote 16 essays across 8 laboratory sessions. Natural language processing techniques were first used to calculate the narrativity of each essay. Random walk and Euclidian distance measures were then used to visualize and classify students' flexibility in narrativity across essays. The results support the hypotheses that students who were flexible in their use of narrativity also wrote essays that were rated as having higher quality, whereas inflexible writers tended to write lower quality essays. Additionally, more flexible writers performed higher than the more inflexible writers on general assessments of literacy and prior knowledge. These results are important for researchers and educators, as they indicate that the link between textual properties and writing quality may fluctuate according to the context of a given writing assignment. (PsycINFO Database Record

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 18 2016

Fingerprint

flexibility
Students
narrative
Natural Language Processing
Linguistics
writer
student
Research Personnel
educator
linguistics
language
literacy
Research
methodology
school
knowledge

Keywords

  • Dynamics
  • Flexibility
  • Individual differences
  • Linguistics
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

The Narrative Waltz : The Role of Flexibility in Writing Proficiency. / Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, 18.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1bd417f8e726406e839de18c61aed508,
title = "The Narrative Waltz: The Role of Flexibility in Writing Proficiency",
abstract = "A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality writing is typically associated with decreased levels of text narrativity and readability. In this study, the authors present the hypothesis that writing proficiency is associated with an individual's flexible use of linguistic properties, rather than simply the consistent use of a particular set of linguistic properties. To test this hypothesis, the authors leveraged both natural language processing and dynamic methodologies to capture variability in students' use of narrative style across multiple essay prompts. Forty-five high school students wrote 16 essays across 8 laboratory sessions. Natural language processing techniques were first used to calculate the narrativity of each essay. Random walk and Euclidian distance measures were then used to visualize and classify students' flexibility in narrativity across essays. The results support the hypotheses that students who were flexible in their use of narrativity also wrote essays that were rated as having higher quality, whereas inflexible writers tended to write lower quality essays. Additionally, more flexible writers performed higher than the more inflexible writers on general assessments of literacy and prior knowledge. These results are important for researchers and educators, as they indicate that the link between textual properties and writing quality may fluctuate according to the context of a given writing assignment. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "Dynamics, Flexibility, Individual differences, Linguistics, Writing",
author = "Allen, {Laura K.} and Snow, {Erica L.} and Danielle McNamara",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1037/edu0000109",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Narrative Waltz

T2 - The Role of Flexibility in Writing Proficiency

AU - Allen, Laura K.

AU - Snow, Erica L.

AU - McNamara, Danielle

PY - 2016/1/18

Y1 - 2016/1/18

N2 - A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality writing is typically associated with decreased levels of text narrativity and readability. In this study, the authors present the hypothesis that writing proficiency is associated with an individual's flexible use of linguistic properties, rather than simply the consistent use of a particular set of linguistic properties. To test this hypothesis, the authors leveraged both natural language processing and dynamic methodologies to capture variability in students' use of narrative style across multiple essay prompts. Forty-five high school students wrote 16 essays across 8 laboratory sessions. Natural language processing techniques were first used to calculate the narrativity of each essay. Random walk and Euclidian distance measures were then used to visualize and classify students' flexibility in narrativity across essays. The results support the hypotheses that students who were flexible in their use of narrativity also wrote essays that were rated as having higher quality, whereas inflexible writers tended to write lower quality essays. Additionally, more flexible writers performed higher than the more inflexible writers on general assessments of literacy and prior knowledge. These results are important for researchers and educators, as they indicate that the link between textual properties and writing quality may fluctuate according to the context of a given writing assignment. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality writing is typically associated with decreased levels of text narrativity and readability. In this study, the authors present the hypothesis that writing proficiency is associated with an individual's flexible use of linguistic properties, rather than simply the consistent use of a particular set of linguistic properties. To test this hypothesis, the authors leveraged both natural language processing and dynamic methodologies to capture variability in students' use of narrative style across multiple essay prompts. Forty-five high school students wrote 16 essays across 8 laboratory sessions. Natural language processing techniques were first used to calculate the narrativity of each essay. Random walk and Euclidian distance measures were then used to visualize and classify students' flexibility in narrativity across essays. The results support the hypotheses that students who were flexible in their use of narrativity also wrote essays that were rated as having higher quality, whereas inflexible writers tended to write lower quality essays. Additionally, more flexible writers performed higher than the more inflexible writers on general assessments of literacy and prior knowledge. These results are important for researchers and educators, as they indicate that the link between textual properties and writing quality may fluctuate according to the context of a given writing assignment. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - Dynamics

KW - Flexibility

KW - Individual differences

KW - Linguistics

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954443833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954443833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/edu0000109

DO - 10.1037/edu0000109

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84954443833

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

ER -