The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts

Allison D. Redlich, Shi Yan, Robert J. Norris, Shawn D. Bushway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence on confession evidence in trials is quite strong; triers of fact who hear confession evidence find these self-incriminating statements hard to ignore and in turn, vote to convict more often. However, most cases do not see the inside of a courtroom, but rather are resolved via plea bargains. In the present study, we examined how confessions, whether partial or full, influence guilty plea rates and plea discounts (the difference between sentence received at trial if convicted and sentence received as part of the plea). We coded more than 500 district attorney case files for defendant statement type (i.e., not questioned by police, questioned but denied guilt, questioned and partially confessed, questioned and fully confessed), case disposition (guilty plea, trial, dismissal), and other pertinent information (e.g., initial charges, perceived strength of evidence). We found that whereas those who denied guilt were the least likely to plead guilty, when they did plead, they enjoyed the largest plea discounts. In addition, partial and full confessors were found to be equally likely to plead guilty (both at near-ceiling levels), but partial confessors received the smallest plea discounts by far. Our findings have implications for theories of remorse and punishment, and plea decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-157
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Guilt
guilt
Lawyers
Punishment
Police
district attorney
evidence
Decision Making
dismissal
disposition
penalty
voter
police
decision making

Keywords

  • Confessions
  • Guilty pleas
  • Plea discount
  • Remorse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts. / Redlich, Allison D.; Yan, Shi; Norris, Robert J.; Bushway, Shawn D.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 147-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Redlich, Allison D. ; Yan, Shi ; Norris, Robert J. ; Bushway, Shawn D. / The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts. In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 147-157.
@article{e5ae2fe375474f7c86cbbda40b37b3e3,
title = "The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts",
abstract = "The influence on confession evidence in trials is quite strong; triers of fact who hear confession evidence find these self-incriminating statements hard to ignore and in turn, vote to convict more often. However, most cases do not see the inside of a courtroom, but rather are resolved via plea bargains. In the present study, we examined how confessions, whether partial or full, influence guilty plea rates and plea discounts (the difference between sentence received at trial if convicted and sentence received as part of the plea). We coded more than 500 district attorney case files for defendant statement type (i.e., not questioned by police, questioned but denied guilt, questioned and partially confessed, questioned and fully confessed), case disposition (guilty plea, trial, dismissal), and other pertinent information (e.g., initial charges, perceived strength of evidence). We found that whereas those who denied guilt were the least likely to plead guilty, when they did plead, they enjoyed the largest plea discounts. In addition, partial and full confessors were found to be equally likely to plead guilty (both at near-ceiling levels), but partial confessors received the smallest plea discounts by far. Our findings have implications for theories of remorse and punishment, and plea decision-making.",
keywords = "Confessions, Guilty pleas, Plea discount, Remorse",
author = "Redlich, {Allison D.} and Shi Yan and Norris, {Robert J.} and Bushway, {Shawn D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/law0000144",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "147--157",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and plea discounts

AU - Redlich, Allison D.

AU - Yan, Shi

AU - Norris, Robert J.

AU - Bushway, Shawn D.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - The influence on confession evidence in trials is quite strong; triers of fact who hear confession evidence find these self-incriminating statements hard to ignore and in turn, vote to convict more often. However, most cases do not see the inside of a courtroom, but rather are resolved via plea bargains. In the present study, we examined how confessions, whether partial or full, influence guilty plea rates and plea discounts (the difference between sentence received at trial if convicted and sentence received as part of the plea). We coded more than 500 district attorney case files for defendant statement type (i.e., not questioned by police, questioned but denied guilt, questioned and partially confessed, questioned and fully confessed), case disposition (guilty plea, trial, dismissal), and other pertinent information (e.g., initial charges, perceived strength of evidence). We found that whereas those who denied guilt were the least likely to plead guilty, when they did plead, they enjoyed the largest plea discounts. In addition, partial and full confessors were found to be equally likely to plead guilty (both at near-ceiling levels), but partial confessors received the smallest plea discounts by far. Our findings have implications for theories of remorse and punishment, and plea decision-making.

AB - The influence on confession evidence in trials is quite strong; triers of fact who hear confession evidence find these self-incriminating statements hard to ignore and in turn, vote to convict more often. However, most cases do not see the inside of a courtroom, but rather are resolved via plea bargains. In the present study, we examined how confessions, whether partial or full, influence guilty plea rates and plea discounts (the difference between sentence received at trial if convicted and sentence received as part of the plea). We coded more than 500 district attorney case files for defendant statement type (i.e., not questioned by police, questioned but denied guilt, questioned and partially confessed, questioned and fully confessed), case disposition (guilty plea, trial, dismissal), and other pertinent information (e.g., initial charges, perceived strength of evidence). We found that whereas those who denied guilt were the least likely to plead guilty, when they did plead, they enjoyed the largest plea discounts. In addition, partial and full confessors were found to be equally likely to plead guilty (both at near-ceiling levels), but partial confessors received the smallest plea discounts by far. Our findings have implications for theories of remorse and punishment, and plea decision-making.

KW - Confessions

KW - Guilty pleas

KW - Plea discount

KW - Remorse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029790281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029790281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000144

DO - 10.1037/law0000144

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029790281

VL - 24

SP - 147

EP - 157

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 2

ER -