The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty

Burak Kazaz, Scott Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper studies the role of the yield-dependent trading cost structure influencing the optimal choice of the selling price and production quantity for a firm that operates under supply uncertainty in the agricultural industry. The firm initially leases farm space, but its realized amount of fruit supply fluctuates because of weather conditions, diseases, etc. At the end of the growing season, the firm has three options: convert its crop supply to the final product, purchase additional supplies from other growers, and sell some (or all) of its crop supply in the open market without converting to the finished product. We consider the problem both from a risk-neutral and a risk-averse perspective with varying degrees of risk aversion. The paper offers three sets of contributions: (1) It shows that the use of a static cost exaggerates the initial investment in the farm space and the expected profit significantly, and the actual value gained from a secondary (emergency) option for an agricultural firm is lower under the yield-dependent cost structure. (2) It proves that although the risk-neutral firm does not benefit from fruit futures, a sufficiently risk-averse firm can benefit from the presence of a fruit futures market. The same risk-averse firm does not purchase fruit futures when it operates under static costs. Thus, fruit futures can only add value under yield-dependent trading costs. (3) Contrary to the results presented for the newsvendor problem under demand uncertainty, the firm does not always commit to a lower initial quantity (leased farm space) under risk aversion. Rather, the firm might lease a larger farm space under risk aversion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-417
Number of pages14
JournalManufacturing and Service Operations Management
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pricing
Supply uncertainty
Production planning
Trading costs
Fruit
Farm
Risk aversion
Risk-averse
Cost structure
Crops
Purchase
Costs
Lease
Weather
Industry
Profit
Newsvendor problem
Demand uncertainty
Futures markets
Emergency

Keywords

  • Fruit futures
  • Pricing
  • Risk aversion
  • Supply uncertainty
  • Yield-dependent trading costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

@article{8a4183d25ced4108afff2cfb1cdeee20,
title = "The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty",
abstract = "This paper studies the role of the yield-dependent trading cost structure influencing the optimal choice of the selling price and production quantity for a firm that operates under supply uncertainty in the agricultural industry. The firm initially leases farm space, but its realized amount of fruit supply fluctuates because of weather conditions, diseases, etc. At the end of the growing season, the firm has three options: convert its crop supply to the final product, purchase additional supplies from other growers, and sell some (or all) of its crop supply in the open market without converting to the finished product. We consider the problem both from a risk-neutral and a risk-averse perspective with varying degrees of risk aversion. The paper offers three sets of contributions: (1) It shows that the use of a static cost exaggerates the initial investment in the farm space and the expected profit significantly, and the actual value gained from a secondary (emergency) option for an agricultural firm is lower under the yield-dependent cost structure. (2) It proves that although the risk-neutral firm does not benefit from fruit futures, a sufficiently risk-averse firm can benefit from the presence of a fruit futures market. The same risk-averse firm does not purchase fruit futures when it operates under static costs. Thus, fruit futures can only add value under yield-dependent trading costs. (3) Contrary to the results presented for the newsvendor problem under demand uncertainty, the firm does not always commit to a lower initial quantity (leased farm space) under risk aversion. Rather, the firm might lease a larger farm space under risk aversion.",
keywords = "Fruit futures, Pricing, Risk aversion, Supply uncertainty, Yield-dependent trading costs",
author = "Burak Kazaz and Scott Webster",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1287/msom.1110.0335",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "404--417",
journal = "Manufacturing and Service Operations Management",
issn = "1523-4614",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty

AU - Kazaz, Burak

AU - Webster, Scott

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - This paper studies the role of the yield-dependent trading cost structure influencing the optimal choice of the selling price and production quantity for a firm that operates under supply uncertainty in the agricultural industry. The firm initially leases farm space, but its realized amount of fruit supply fluctuates because of weather conditions, diseases, etc. At the end of the growing season, the firm has three options: convert its crop supply to the final product, purchase additional supplies from other growers, and sell some (or all) of its crop supply in the open market without converting to the finished product. We consider the problem both from a risk-neutral and a risk-averse perspective with varying degrees of risk aversion. The paper offers three sets of contributions: (1) It shows that the use of a static cost exaggerates the initial investment in the farm space and the expected profit significantly, and the actual value gained from a secondary (emergency) option for an agricultural firm is lower under the yield-dependent cost structure. (2) It proves that although the risk-neutral firm does not benefit from fruit futures, a sufficiently risk-averse firm can benefit from the presence of a fruit futures market. The same risk-averse firm does not purchase fruit futures when it operates under static costs. Thus, fruit futures can only add value under yield-dependent trading costs. (3) Contrary to the results presented for the newsvendor problem under demand uncertainty, the firm does not always commit to a lower initial quantity (leased farm space) under risk aversion. Rather, the firm might lease a larger farm space under risk aversion.

AB - This paper studies the role of the yield-dependent trading cost structure influencing the optimal choice of the selling price and production quantity for a firm that operates under supply uncertainty in the agricultural industry. The firm initially leases farm space, but its realized amount of fruit supply fluctuates because of weather conditions, diseases, etc. At the end of the growing season, the firm has three options: convert its crop supply to the final product, purchase additional supplies from other growers, and sell some (or all) of its crop supply in the open market without converting to the finished product. We consider the problem both from a risk-neutral and a risk-averse perspective with varying degrees of risk aversion. The paper offers three sets of contributions: (1) It shows that the use of a static cost exaggerates the initial investment in the farm space and the expected profit significantly, and the actual value gained from a secondary (emergency) option for an agricultural firm is lower under the yield-dependent cost structure. (2) It proves that although the risk-neutral firm does not benefit from fruit futures, a sufficiently risk-averse firm can benefit from the presence of a fruit futures market. The same risk-averse firm does not purchase fruit futures when it operates under static costs. Thus, fruit futures can only add value under yield-dependent trading costs. (3) Contrary to the results presented for the newsvendor problem under demand uncertainty, the firm does not always commit to a lower initial quantity (leased farm space) under risk aversion. Rather, the firm might lease a larger farm space under risk aversion.

KW - Fruit futures

KW - Pricing

KW - Risk aversion

KW - Supply uncertainty

KW - Yield-dependent trading costs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960479645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960479645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/msom.1110.0335

DO - 10.1287/msom.1110.0335

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 404

EP - 417

JO - Manufacturing and Service Operations Management

JF - Manufacturing and Service Operations Management

SN - 1523-4614

IS - 3

ER -