Abstract

Opinion dynamics have fascinated researchers for centuries. The ability of societies to learn as well as the emergence of irrational herding are equally evident. The simplest example is that of agents that have to determine a binary action, under peer pressure coming from the decisions observed. By modifying several popular models for opinion dynamics so that agents internalize random actions rather than smooth estimates of what other people think, we are able to prove that almost surely the actions final outcome remains random, even though actions can be consensual or polarized depending on the model. This is a theoretical confirmation that the mechanism that leads to the emergence of irrational herding behavior lies in the loss of nuanced information regarding the privately held beliefs behind the individuals decisions. Interestingly, in expectation, all these models correspond to classical opinion dynamics models. This means that in every event the temporal evolution of the society does not follow the mean behavior predicted by classical models. We also provide a simple argument that shows that the final descent into the herd is exponential and does not depend on the network topology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8268532
Pages (from-to)576-584
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dynamic models
Topology

Keywords

  • Convergence
  • herding
  • opinion dynamics
  • random actions
  • social dynamics
  • social netwokrs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Signal Processing

Cite this

The Impact of Random Actions on Opinion Dynamics. / Leshem, Amir; Scaglione, Anna.

In: IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, Vol. 4, No. 3, 8268532, 01.09.2018, p. 576-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{649d1a8b95ce4984acf637dd38a17443,
title = "The Impact of Random Actions on Opinion Dynamics",
abstract = "Opinion dynamics have fascinated researchers for centuries. The ability of societies to learn as well as the emergence of irrational herding are equally evident. The simplest example is that of agents that have to determine a binary action, under peer pressure coming from the decisions observed. By modifying several popular models for opinion dynamics so that agents internalize random actions rather than smooth estimates of what other people think, we are able to prove that almost surely the actions final outcome remains random, even though actions can be consensual or polarized depending on the model. This is a theoretical confirmation that the mechanism that leads to the emergence of irrational herding behavior lies in the loss of nuanced information regarding the privately held beliefs behind the individuals decisions. Interestingly, in expectation, all these models correspond to classical opinion dynamics models. This means that in every event the temporal evolution of the society does not follow the mean behavior predicted by classical models. We also provide a simple argument that shows that the final descent into the herd is exponential and does not depend on the network topology.",
keywords = "Convergence, herding, opinion dynamics, random actions, social dynamics, social netwokrs",
author = "Amir Leshem and Anna Scaglione",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TSIPN.2018.2797800",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "576--584",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks",
issn = "2373-776X",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of Random Actions on Opinion Dynamics

AU - Leshem, Amir

AU - Scaglione, Anna

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Opinion dynamics have fascinated researchers for centuries. The ability of societies to learn as well as the emergence of irrational herding are equally evident. The simplest example is that of agents that have to determine a binary action, under peer pressure coming from the decisions observed. By modifying several popular models for opinion dynamics so that agents internalize random actions rather than smooth estimates of what other people think, we are able to prove that almost surely the actions final outcome remains random, even though actions can be consensual or polarized depending on the model. This is a theoretical confirmation that the mechanism that leads to the emergence of irrational herding behavior lies in the loss of nuanced information regarding the privately held beliefs behind the individuals decisions. Interestingly, in expectation, all these models correspond to classical opinion dynamics models. This means that in every event the temporal evolution of the society does not follow the mean behavior predicted by classical models. We also provide a simple argument that shows that the final descent into the herd is exponential and does not depend on the network topology.

AB - Opinion dynamics have fascinated researchers for centuries. The ability of societies to learn as well as the emergence of irrational herding are equally evident. The simplest example is that of agents that have to determine a binary action, under peer pressure coming from the decisions observed. By modifying several popular models for opinion dynamics so that agents internalize random actions rather than smooth estimates of what other people think, we are able to prove that almost surely the actions final outcome remains random, even though actions can be consensual or polarized depending on the model. This is a theoretical confirmation that the mechanism that leads to the emergence of irrational herding behavior lies in the loss of nuanced information regarding the privately held beliefs behind the individuals decisions. Interestingly, in expectation, all these models correspond to classical opinion dynamics models. This means that in every event the temporal evolution of the society does not follow the mean behavior predicted by classical models. We also provide a simple argument that shows that the final descent into the herd is exponential and does not depend on the network topology.

KW - Convergence

KW - herding

KW - opinion dynamics

KW - random actions

KW - social dynamics

KW - social netwokrs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051572219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051572219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TSIPN.2018.2797800

DO - 10.1109/TSIPN.2018.2797800

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051572219

VL - 4

SP - 576

EP - 584

JO - IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks

JF - IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks

SN - 2373-776X

IS - 3

M1 - 8268532

ER -