The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Restrictiveness of Children's Living Environments

Barbara Thomlison, Judy Krysik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish content validity and reliability in assessing the restrictiveness of children's living environments and to develop an instrument that has practical utility to measure restrictiveness. The primary method employed in the study was an expert panel approach. An initial 12-person expert panel was identified to generate a description of the concept of restrictiveness and a list of possible living environment circumstances. A subsequent 64-member expert panel independently rated the restrictiveness of each living environment situation on a 7-point category partition scale ranging from not very restrictive to very restrictive. The expert panels consisted of interdisciplinary professionals engaged in placement planning and decision making regarding children's places of living. Test-retest reliabilities and coefficient alpha indicated the existence of a reliable and consistent assessment of restrictiveness. The process resulted in a valid, reliable, and brief instrument for rating the restrictiveness of 34 children's living environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-219
Number of pages13
JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

expert
Reproducibility of Results
Decision Making
rating
decision making
planning
human being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Restrictiveness of Children's Living Environments. / Thomlison, Barbara; Krysik, Judy.

In: Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1992, p. 207-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4fcee074eebf499db6710bfc5eea58ed,
title = "The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Restrictiveness of Children's Living Environments",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to establish content validity and reliability in assessing the restrictiveness of children's living environments and to develop an instrument that has practical utility to measure restrictiveness. The primary method employed in the study was an expert panel approach. An initial 12-person expert panel was identified to generate a description of the concept of restrictiveness and a list of possible living environment circumstances. A subsequent 64-member expert panel independently rated the restrictiveness of each living environment situation on a 7-point category partition scale ranging from not very restrictive to very restrictive. The expert panels consisted of interdisciplinary professionals engaged in placement planning and decision making regarding children's places of living. Test-retest reliabilities and coefficient alpha indicated the existence of a reliable and consistent assessment of restrictiveness. The process resulted in a valid, reliable, and brief instrument for rating the restrictiveness of 34 children's living environments.",
author = "Barbara Thomlison and Judy Krysik",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1177/104973159200200207",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "207--219",
journal = "Research on Social Work Practice",
issn = "1049-7315",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Development of an Instrument to Measure the Restrictiveness of Children's Living Environments

AU - Thomlison, Barbara

AU - Krysik, Judy

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The purpose of this study was to establish content validity and reliability in assessing the restrictiveness of children's living environments and to develop an instrument that has practical utility to measure restrictiveness. The primary method employed in the study was an expert panel approach. An initial 12-person expert panel was identified to generate a description of the concept of restrictiveness and a list of possible living environment circumstances. A subsequent 64-member expert panel independently rated the restrictiveness of each living environment situation on a 7-point category partition scale ranging from not very restrictive to very restrictive. The expert panels consisted of interdisciplinary professionals engaged in placement planning and decision making regarding children's places of living. Test-retest reliabilities and coefficient alpha indicated the existence of a reliable and consistent assessment of restrictiveness. The process resulted in a valid, reliable, and brief instrument for rating the restrictiveness of 34 children's living environments.

AB - The purpose of this study was to establish content validity and reliability in assessing the restrictiveness of children's living environments and to develop an instrument that has practical utility to measure restrictiveness. The primary method employed in the study was an expert panel approach. An initial 12-person expert panel was identified to generate a description of the concept of restrictiveness and a list of possible living environment circumstances. A subsequent 64-member expert panel independently rated the restrictiveness of each living environment situation on a 7-point category partition scale ranging from not very restrictive to very restrictive. The expert panels consisted of interdisciplinary professionals engaged in placement planning and decision making regarding children's places of living. Test-retest reliabilities and coefficient alpha indicated the existence of a reliable and consistent assessment of restrictiveness. The process resulted in a valid, reliable, and brief instrument for rating the restrictiveness of 34 children's living environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965455413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965455413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/104973159200200207

DO - 10.1177/104973159200200207

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965455413

VL - 2

SP - 207

EP - 219

JO - Research on Social Work Practice

JF - Research on Social Work Practice

SN - 1049-7315

IS - 2

ER -