The Complexity of Institutionalizing Evaluation as a Best Practice in North American Quitlines

Jennifer L. Terpstra, Allan Best, Jessie Saul, Scott J. Leischow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tobacco use continues to be the leading preventable cause of mortality and morbidity in North America and Quitlines are one of the primary cessation resources available to assist tobacco users with quitting. Implementation of best practices is important to the success of quitlines, but unfortunately, it is a complex and elusive process often difficult to achieve. This study aims to better understand the implementation process by using qualitative methods to examine an evaluation practice in-depth and to elucidate the complex factors influencing its implementation and institutionalization in the North American Quitline network. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with decision-makers in the Quitline network. The interview data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, guided by a systems change framework. The findings suggest that a broad range of factors influenced implementation of the evaluation practice at different levels of the system. These factors included system norms, system resources and operations (i.e., policies), five key relationships (e.g., between the funder and service provider), and power placement in the system. Characteristics of the evaluation practice itself also influenced implementation and interacted with other factors in the system. This study demonstrates the complexity of implementing and institutionalizing evaluation in an inter-organizational network. It also demonstrates the value of using qualitative data to study implementation phenomena. The findings can be used to improve efforts to institutionalize evaluation in the Quitline network and inform future implementation research studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-371
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
best practice
evaluation
nicotine
Interviews
Institutionalization
research implementation
Tobacco Use
North America
system change
Tobacco
interview
institutionalization
resources
qualitative method
morbidity
service provider
Best practice
Evaluation
decision maker

Keywords

  • implementation
  • qualitative
  • systems
  • tobacco

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

The Complexity of Institutionalizing Evaluation as a Best Practice in North American Quitlines. / Terpstra, Jennifer L.; Best, Allan; Saul, Jessie; Leischow, Scott J.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 356-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{101a1fcaa344479d9839fae503aa773f,
title = "The Complexity of Institutionalizing Evaluation as a Best Practice in North American Quitlines",
abstract = "Tobacco use continues to be the leading preventable cause of mortality and morbidity in North America and Quitlines are one of the primary cessation resources available to assist tobacco users with quitting. Implementation of best practices is important to the success of quitlines, but unfortunately, it is a complex and elusive process often difficult to achieve. This study aims to better understand the implementation process by using qualitative methods to examine an evaluation practice in-depth and to elucidate the complex factors influencing its implementation and institutionalization in the North American Quitline network. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with decision-makers in the Quitline network. The interview data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, guided by a systems change framework. The findings suggest that a broad range of factors influenced implementation of the evaluation practice at different levels of the system. These factors included system norms, system resources and operations (i.e., policies), five key relationships (e.g., between the funder and service provider), and power placement in the system. Characteristics of the evaluation practice itself also influenced implementation and interacted with other factors in the system. This study demonstrates the complexity of implementing and institutionalizing evaluation in an inter-organizational network. It also demonstrates the value of using qualitative data to study implementation phenomena. The findings can be used to improve efforts to institutionalize evaluation in the Quitline network and inform future implementation research studies.",
keywords = "implementation, qualitative, systems, tobacco",
author = "Terpstra, {Jennifer L.} and Allan Best and Jessie Saul and Leischow, {Scott J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098214013487426",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "356--371",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Complexity of Institutionalizing Evaluation as a Best Practice in North American Quitlines

AU - Terpstra, Jennifer L.

AU - Best, Allan

AU - Saul, Jessie

AU - Leischow, Scott J.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Tobacco use continues to be the leading preventable cause of mortality and morbidity in North America and Quitlines are one of the primary cessation resources available to assist tobacco users with quitting. Implementation of best practices is important to the success of quitlines, but unfortunately, it is a complex and elusive process often difficult to achieve. This study aims to better understand the implementation process by using qualitative methods to examine an evaluation practice in-depth and to elucidate the complex factors influencing its implementation and institutionalization in the North American Quitline network. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with decision-makers in the Quitline network. The interview data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, guided by a systems change framework. The findings suggest that a broad range of factors influenced implementation of the evaluation practice at different levels of the system. These factors included system norms, system resources and operations (i.e., policies), five key relationships (e.g., between the funder and service provider), and power placement in the system. Characteristics of the evaluation practice itself also influenced implementation and interacted with other factors in the system. This study demonstrates the complexity of implementing and institutionalizing evaluation in an inter-organizational network. It also demonstrates the value of using qualitative data to study implementation phenomena. The findings can be used to improve efforts to institutionalize evaluation in the Quitline network and inform future implementation research studies.

AB - Tobacco use continues to be the leading preventable cause of mortality and morbidity in North America and Quitlines are one of the primary cessation resources available to assist tobacco users with quitting. Implementation of best practices is important to the success of quitlines, but unfortunately, it is a complex and elusive process often difficult to achieve. This study aims to better understand the implementation process by using qualitative methods to examine an evaluation practice in-depth and to elucidate the complex factors influencing its implementation and institutionalization in the North American Quitline network. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with decision-makers in the Quitline network. The interview data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, guided by a systems change framework. The findings suggest that a broad range of factors influenced implementation of the evaluation practice at different levels of the system. These factors included system norms, system resources and operations (i.e., policies), five key relationships (e.g., between the funder and service provider), and power placement in the system. Characteristics of the evaluation practice itself also influenced implementation and interacted with other factors in the system. This study demonstrates the complexity of implementing and institutionalizing evaluation in an inter-organizational network. It also demonstrates the value of using qualitative data to study implementation phenomena. The findings can be used to improve efforts to institutionalize evaluation in the Quitline network and inform future implementation research studies.

KW - implementation

KW - qualitative

KW - systems

KW - tobacco

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880664271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880664271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214013487426

DO - 10.1177/1098214013487426

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880664271

VL - 34

SP - 356

EP - 371

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 3

ER -