The comparative metropolitan analysis project

Patricia Gober

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The rise in spatial analysis, numerical methods, and theory testing of the 1960s thrust the field of urban geography into a period of reductionist research, one that assumed the urban system was no more than the sum of its parts and that these parts could be studied without reference to the system itself. Amid this reductionist approach to urban inquiry came the Comparative Metropolitan Analysis Project of the 1970s, which sought to use results of the 1970 Census to assess progress on a range of urban-policy issues, including race, class, poverty, and housing in the nation's 20 largest metropolitan areas. The project produced (1) a comparative atlas of the 20 urban regions, (2) a book assessing management and performance in 12 major policy areas, and (3) a collection of 20 short monographs outlining the physical, social, and economic make-up of urban areas, highlighting both common problems and local individuality. This essay reviews the history, intellectual context, and significance of the project with an eye toward the fundamental tension between its integrative and outward-looking aspirations and disciplinary trends of fragmentation, specialization, and insularity. Due to this tension, the project quickly disappeared from our disciplinary consciousness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-432
Number of pages10
JournalUrban Geography
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2002

Fingerprint

urban geography
history of ideas
urban policy
urban region
individuality
urban system
policy area
spatial analysis
atlas
specialization
numerical method
fragmentation
metropolitan area
consciousness
census
agglomeration area
poverty
urban area
thrust
housing

Keywords

  • Comparative atlas
  • Metropolitan vignette
  • Synthesis
  • Urban policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

The comparative metropolitan analysis project. / Gober, Patricia.

In: Urban Geography, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.08.2002, p. 423-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gober, Patricia. / The comparative metropolitan analysis project. In: Urban Geography. 2002 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 423-432.
@article{e933e3e112604e26829f66760dcef598,
title = "The comparative metropolitan analysis project",
abstract = "The rise in spatial analysis, numerical methods, and theory testing of the 1960s thrust the field of urban geography into a period of reductionist research, one that assumed the urban system was no more than the sum of its parts and that these parts could be studied without reference to the system itself. Amid this reductionist approach to urban inquiry came the Comparative Metropolitan Analysis Project of the 1970s, which sought to use results of the 1970 Census to assess progress on a range of urban-policy issues, including race, class, poverty, and housing in the nation's 20 largest metropolitan areas. The project produced (1) a comparative atlas of the 20 urban regions, (2) a book assessing management and performance in 12 major policy areas, and (3) a collection of 20 short monographs outlining the physical, social, and economic make-up of urban areas, highlighting both common problems and local individuality. This essay reviews the history, intellectual context, and significance of the project with an eye toward the fundamental tension between its integrative and outward-looking aspirations and disciplinary trends of fragmentation, specialization, and insularity. Due to this tension, the project quickly disappeared from our disciplinary consciousness.",
keywords = "Comparative atlas, Metropolitan vignette, Synthesis, Urban policy",
author = "Patricia Gober",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2747/0272-3638.23.5.423",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "423--432",
journal = "Urban Geography",
issn = "0272-3638",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The comparative metropolitan analysis project

AU - Gober, Patricia

PY - 2002/8/1

Y1 - 2002/8/1

N2 - The rise in spatial analysis, numerical methods, and theory testing of the 1960s thrust the field of urban geography into a period of reductionist research, one that assumed the urban system was no more than the sum of its parts and that these parts could be studied without reference to the system itself. Amid this reductionist approach to urban inquiry came the Comparative Metropolitan Analysis Project of the 1970s, which sought to use results of the 1970 Census to assess progress on a range of urban-policy issues, including race, class, poverty, and housing in the nation's 20 largest metropolitan areas. The project produced (1) a comparative atlas of the 20 urban regions, (2) a book assessing management and performance in 12 major policy areas, and (3) a collection of 20 short monographs outlining the physical, social, and economic make-up of urban areas, highlighting both common problems and local individuality. This essay reviews the history, intellectual context, and significance of the project with an eye toward the fundamental tension between its integrative and outward-looking aspirations and disciplinary trends of fragmentation, specialization, and insularity. Due to this tension, the project quickly disappeared from our disciplinary consciousness.

AB - The rise in spatial analysis, numerical methods, and theory testing of the 1960s thrust the field of urban geography into a period of reductionist research, one that assumed the urban system was no more than the sum of its parts and that these parts could be studied without reference to the system itself. Amid this reductionist approach to urban inquiry came the Comparative Metropolitan Analysis Project of the 1970s, which sought to use results of the 1970 Census to assess progress on a range of urban-policy issues, including race, class, poverty, and housing in the nation's 20 largest metropolitan areas. The project produced (1) a comparative atlas of the 20 urban regions, (2) a book assessing management and performance in 12 major policy areas, and (3) a collection of 20 short monographs outlining the physical, social, and economic make-up of urban areas, highlighting both common problems and local individuality. This essay reviews the history, intellectual context, and significance of the project with an eye toward the fundamental tension between its integrative and outward-looking aspirations and disciplinary trends of fragmentation, specialization, and insularity. Due to this tension, the project quickly disappeared from our disciplinary consciousness.

KW - Comparative atlas

KW - Metropolitan vignette

KW - Synthesis

KW - Urban policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036663908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036663908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2747/0272-3638.23.5.423

DO - 10.2747/0272-3638.23.5.423

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036663908

VL - 23

SP - 423

EP - 432

JO - Urban Geography

JF - Urban Geography

SN - 0272-3638

IS - 5

ER -