The CHOICE study

A "taste-test" of utilitarian vs. leisure walking among older adults

Eric B. Hekler, Cynthia M. Castro, Matthew Buman, Abby C. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Utilitarian walking (e.g., walking for transport) and leisure walking (e.g., walking for health/recreation) are encouraged to promote health, yet few studies have explored specific preferences for these two forms of physical activity or factors that impact such preferences. A quasi-experimental crossover design was used to evaluate how training underactive midlife and older adults in each type of walking impacted total steps taken and how it was linked to their subsequent choice of walking types. Methods: Participants (N = 16) were midlife and older adults (M age = 64 ± 8 years) who were mostly women (81%) and white (75%). To control for order effects, participants were randomized to instruction in either utilitarian or leisure walking for 2 weeks and then the other type for 2 weeks. Participants then entered a 2-week "free choice" phase in which they chose any mixture of the walking types. Outcome variables included walking via OMRON pedometer and the ratio of utilitarian versus leisure walking during the free-choice phase. Participants completed surveys about their neighborhood (NEWS) and daily travel to multiple locations. Results: Instruction in leisure-only, utilitarian-only, and a freely chosen mixture of the two each resulted in significant increases in steps taken relative to baseline (ps < 0.05). Having to go to multiple locations daily and traveling greater distances to locations were associated with engagement in more utilitarian walking. In contrast, good walking paths, neighborhood aesthetics, easy access to exercise facilities, and perceiving easier access to neighborhood services were associated with more leisure walking. Conclusions: Results from this pilot study suggest that midlife and older adults may most easily meet guidelines through either leisure only or a mixture of leisure and utilitarian walking, and tailored suggestions based on the person's neighborhood may be useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-129
Number of pages4
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Leisure Activities
Walking
Exercise
Recreation
Health
Esthetics
Cross-Over Studies
Research Design

Keywords

  • Perceived built environment
  • Utilitarian physical activity
  • Walking intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Applied Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The CHOICE study : A "taste-test" of utilitarian vs. leisure walking among older adults. / Hekler, Eric B.; Castro, Cynthia M.; Buman, Matthew; King, Abby C.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 126-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hekler, Eric B. ; Castro, Cynthia M. ; Buman, Matthew ; King, Abby C. / The CHOICE study : A "taste-test" of utilitarian vs. leisure walking among older adults. In: Health Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 126-129.
@article{e458847543cc4b3c8b71df8faca5d7eb,
title = "The CHOICE study: A {"}taste-test{"} of utilitarian vs. leisure walking among older adults",
abstract = "Objective: Utilitarian walking (e.g., walking for transport) and leisure walking (e.g., walking for health/recreation) are encouraged to promote health, yet few studies have explored specific preferences for these two forms of physical activity or factors that impact such preferences. A quasi-experimental crossover design was used to evaluate how training underactive midlife and older adults in each type of walking impacted total steps taken and how it was linked to their subsequent choice of walking types. Methods: Participants (N = 16) were midlife and older adults (M age = 64 ± 8 years) who were mostly women (81{\%}) and white (75{\%}). To control for order effects, participants were randomized to instruction in either utilitarian or leisure walking for 2 weeks and then the other type for 2 weeks. Participants then entered a 2-week {"}free choice{"} phase in which they chose any mixture of the walking types. Outcome variables included walking via OMRON pedometer and the ratio of utilitarian versus leisure walking during the free-choice phase. Participants completed surveys about their neighborhood (NEWS) and daily travel to multiple locations. Results: Instruction in leisure-only, utilitarian-only, and a freely chosen mixture of the two each resulted in significant increases in steps taken relative to baseline (ps < 0.05). Having to go to multiple locations daily and traveling greater distances to locations were associated with engagement in more utilitarian walking. In contrast, good walking paths, neighborhood aesthetics, easy access to exercise facilities, and perceiving easier access to neighborhood services were associated with more leisure walking. Conclusions: Results from this pilot study suggest that midlife and older adults may most easily meet guidelines through either leisure only or a mixture of leisure and utilitarian walking, and tailored suggestions based on the person's neighborhood may be useful.",
keywords = "Perceived built environment, Utilitarian physical activity, Walking intervention",
author = "Hekler, {Eric B.} and Castro, {Cynthia M.} and Matthew Buman and King, {Abby C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0025567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "126--129",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The CHOICE study

T2 - A "taste-test" of utilitarian vs. leisure walking among older adults

AU - Hekler, Eric B.

AU - Castro, Cynthia M.

AU - Buman, Matthew

AU - King, Abby C.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Objective: Utilitarian walking (e.g., walking for transport) and leisure walking (e.g., walking for health/recreation) are encouraged to promote health, yet few studies have explored specific preferences for these two forms of physical activity or factors that impact such preferences. A quasi-experimental crossover design was used to evaluate how training underactive midlife and older adults in each type of walking impacted total steps taken and how it was linked to their subsequent choice of walking types. Methods: Participants (N = 16) were midlife and older adults (M age = 64 ± 8 years) who were mostly women (81%) and white (75%). To control for order effects, participants were randomized to instruction in either utilitarian or leisure walking for 2 weeks and then the other type for 2 weeks. Participants then entered a 2-week "free choice" phase in which they chose any mixture of the walking types. Outcome variables included walking via OMRON pedometer and the ratio of utilitarian versus leisure walking during the free-choice phase. Participants completed surveys about their neighborhood (NEWS) and daily travel to multiple locations. Results: Instruction in leisure-only, utilitarian-only, and a freely chosen mixture of the two each resulted in significant increases in steps taken relative to baseline (ps < 0.05). Having to go to multiple locations daily and traveling greater distances to locations were associated with engagement in more utilitarian walking. In contrast, good walking paths, neighborhood aesthetics, easy access to exercise facilities, and perceiving easier access to neighborhood services were associated with more leisure walking. Conclusions: Results from this pilot study suggest that midlife and older adults may most easily meet guidelines through either leisure only or a mixture of leisure and utilitarian walking, and tailored suggestions based on the person's neighborhood may be useful.

AB - Objective: Utilitarian walking (e.g., walking for transport) and leisure walking (e.g., walking for health/recreation) are encouraged to promote health, yet few studies have explored specific preferences for these two forms of physical activity or factors that impact such preferences. A quasi-experimental crossover design was used to evaluate how training underactive midlife and older adults in each type of walking impacted total steps taken and how it was linked to their subsequent choice of walking types. Methods: Participants (N = 16) were midlife and older adults (M age = 64 ± 8 years) who were mostly women (81%) and white (75%). To control for order effects, participants were randomized to instruction in either utilitarian or leisure walking for 2 weeks and then the other type for 2 weeks. Participants then entered a 2-week "free choice" phase in which they chose any mixture of the walking types. Outcome variables included walking via OMRON pedometer and the ratio of utilitarian versus leisure walking during the free-choice phase. Participants completed surveys about their neighborhood (NEWS) and daily travel to multiple locations. Results: Instruction in leisure-only, utilitarian-only, and a freely chosen mixture of the two each resulted in significant increases in steps taken relative to baseline (ps < 0.05). Having to go to multiple locations daily and traveling greater distances to locations were associated with engagement in more utilitarian walking. In contrast, good walking paths, neighborhood aesthetics, easy access to exercise facilities, and perceiving easier access to neighborhood services were associated with more leisure walking. Conclusions: Results from this pilot study suggest that midlife and older adults may most easily meet guidelines through either leisure only or a mixture of leisure and utilitarian walking, and tailored suggestions based on the person's neighborhood may be useful.

KW - Perceived built environment

KW - Utilitarian physical activity

KW - Walking intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857212097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857212097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0025567

DO - 10.1037/a0025567

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 126

EP - 129

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 1

ER -