The “central meaning” and path dependence: The madison-meiklejohn-brennan nexus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Justice William J. Brennan’s opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is widely recognized for many reasons, including, as articulated by Professor Harry Kalven, that it put “the First Amendment right side up for the first time” by identifying its “central meaning.” That meaning is the constitutional protection of speech critical of government and its officials – speech vital in a self-governing democracy. Justice Brennan’s approach was derived, in part, from the writings of James Madison, to whom the justice refers generously throughout the opinion, and Alexander Meiklejohn, to whom Justice Brennan gave credit only after the fact. This article examines the philosophical lineage from Madison to Meiklejohn to Brennan, and does so through the lens of path dependence, a perspective that advocates that history matters. A critique of path dependence emerges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-148
Number of pages32
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2015

Fingerprint

path dependence
justice
Lenses
amendment
credit
university teacher
democracy
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Communication

Cite this

The “central meaning” and path dependence : The madison-meiklejohn-brennan nexus. / Russomanno, Joseph.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.04.2015, p. 117-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f26d4c6cf37344b6b757c660f1e7031a,
title = "The “central meaning” and path dependence: The madison-meiklejohn-brennan nexus",
abstract = "Justice William J. Brennan’s opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is widely recognized for many reasons, including, as articulated by Professor Harry Kalven, that it put “the First Amendment right side up for the first time” by identifying its “central meaning.” That meaning is the constitutional protection of speech critical of government and its officials – speech vital in a self-governing democracy. Justice Brennan’s approach was derived, in part, from the writings of James Madison, to whom the justice refers generously throughout the opinion, and Alexander Meiklejohn, to whom Justice Brennan gave credit only after the fact. This article examines the philosophical lineage from Madison to Meiklejohn to Brennan, and does so through the lens of path dependence, a perspective that advocates that history matters. A critique of path dependence emerges.",
author = "Joseph Russomanno",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10811680.2015.1023155",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "117--148",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The “central meaning” and path dependence

T2 - The madison-meiklejohn-brennan nexus

AU - Russomanno, Joseph

PY - 2015/4/3

Y1 - 2015/4/3

N2 - Justice William J. Brennan’s opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is widely recognized for many reasons, including, as articulated by Professor Harry Kalven, that it put “the First Amendment right side up for the first time” by identifying its “central meaning.” That meaning is the constitutional protection of speech critical of government and its officials – speech vital in a self-governing democracy. Justice Brennan’s approach was derived, in part, from the writings of James Madison, to whom the justice refers generously throughout the opinion, and Alexander Meiklejohn, to whom Justice Brennan gave credit only after the fact. This article examines the philosophical lineage from Madison to Meiklejohn to Brennan, and does so through the lens of path dependence, a perspective that advocates that history matters. A critique of path dependence emerges.

AB - Justice William J. Brennan’s opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is widely recognized for many reasons, including, as articulated by Professor Harry Kalven, that it put “the First Amendment right side up for the first time” by identifying its “central meaning.” That meaning is the constitutional protection of speech critical of government and its officials – speech vital in a self-governing democracy. Justice Brennan’s approach was derived, in part, from the writings of James Madison, to whom the justice refers generously throughout the opinion, and Alexander Meiklejohn, to whom Justice Brennan gave credit only after the fact. This article examines the philosophical lineage from Madison to Meiklejohn to Brennan, and does so through the lens of path dependence, a perspective that advocates that history matters. A critique of path dependence emerges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928471910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928471910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680.2015.1023155

DO - 10.1080/10811680.2015.1023155

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928471910

VL - 20

SP - 117

EP - 148

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 2

ER -