The best training depends on the receiver architecture

Azadeh Vosoughi, Anna Scaglione

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider a block fading frequency selective multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channel in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). The channel input is a training vector superimposed on a linearly preceded vector of Gaussian symbols. This form of preceding is referred to as affine precoding. We derive the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) under two circumstances: the random parameter vector to be estimated contains (i) only fading channel coefficients, (ii) unknown data symbols as well as the channel coefficients. While case (i) corresponds to the decoding schemes in which the channel is estimated first and the channel measurement is utilized to recover the data symbols, case (ii) corresponds to methods in which channel and symbol estimation is performed jointly. The interesting outcome of our investigation is that minimizing trace of the channel CRB for cases (i) and (ii) under a total transmit power constraint leads to different affine precoder design guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings
Volume4
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing - Montreal, Que, Canada
Duration: May 17 2004May 21 2004

Other

OtherProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
CountryCanada
CityMontreal, Que
Period5/17/045/21/04

Fingerprint

Cramer-Rao bounds
education
receivers
Frequency selective fading
Fading channels
Decoding
fading
decoding
coefficients
random noise
output

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Signal Processing
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Vosoughi, A., & Scaglione, A. (2004). The best training depends on the receiver architecture. In ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings (Vol. 4)

The best training depends on the receiver architecture. / Vosoughi, Azadeh; Scaglione, Anna.

ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings. Vol. 4 2004.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Vosoughi, A & Scaglione, A 2004, The best training depends on the receiver architecture. in ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings. vol. 4, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Montreal, Que, Canada, 5/17/04.
Vosoughi A, Scaglione A. The best training depends on the receiver architecture. In ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings. Vol. 4. 2004
Vosoughi, Azadeh ; Scaglione, Anna. / The best training depends on the receiver architecture. ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings. Vol. 4 2004.
@inproceedings{cd614b87500845c1a45244f89ef0cbac,
title = "The best training depends on the receiver architecture",
abstract = "We consider a block fading frequency selective multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channel in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). The channel input is a training vector superimposed on a linearly preceded vector of Gaussian symbols. This form of preceding is referred to as affine precoding. We derive the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) under two circumstances: the random parameter vector to be estimated contains (i) only fading channel coefficients, (ii) unknown data symbols as well as the channel coefficients. While case (i) corresponds to the decoding schemes in which the channel is estimated first and the channel measurement is utilized to recover the data symbols, case (ii) corresponds to methods in which channel and symbol estimation is performed jointly. The interesting outcome of our investigation is that minimizing trace of the channel CRB for cases (i) and (ii) under a total transmit power constraint leads to different affine precoder design guidelines.",
author = "Azadeh Vosoughi and Anna Scaglione",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
booktitle = "ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The best training depends on the receiver architecture

AU - Vosoughi, Azadeh

AU - Scaglione, Anna

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - We consider a block fading frequency selective multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channel in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). The channel input is a training vector superimposed on a linearly preceded vector of Gaussian symbols. This form of preceding is referred to as affine precoding. We derive the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) under two circumstances: the random parameter vector to be estimated contains (i) only fading channel coefficients, (ii) unknown data symbols as well as the channel coefficients. While case (i) corresponds to the decoding schemes in which the channel is estimated first and the channel measurement is utilized to recover the data symbols, case (ii) corresponds to methods in which channel and symbol estimation is performed jointly. The interesting outcome of our investigation is that minimizing trace of the channel CRB for cases (i) and (ii) under a total transmit power constraint leads to different affine precoder design guidelines.

AB - We consider a block fading frequency selective multi-input multi-output (MIMO) channel in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). The channel input is a training vector superimposed on a linearly preceded vector of Gaussian symbols. This form of preceding is referred to as affine precoding. We derive the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) under two circumstances: the random parameter vector to be estimated contains (i) only fading channel coefficients, (ii) unknown data symbols as well as the channel coefficients. While case (i) corresponds to the decoding schemes in which the channel is estimated first and the channel measurement is utilized to recover the data symbols, case (ii) corresponds to methods in which channel and symbol estimation is performed jointly. The interesting outcome of our investigation is that minimizing trace of the channel CRB for cases (i) and (ii) under a total transmit power constraint leads to different affine precoder design guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544347525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544347525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 4

BT - ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings

ER -