Testing the universality of star formation - II. Comparing separation distributions of nearby star-forming regions and the field

Robert R. King, Simon P. Goodwin, Richard J. Parker, Jennifer Patience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have measured the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions of seven young star-forming regions using a uniform sample of young binaries. Both the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions are similar in the different regions. A tentative decline in the multiplicity fraction with increasing stellar density is apparent, even for binary systems with separations too close (19-100au) to have been dynamically processed. The separation distributions in the different regions are statistically indistinguishable over most separation ranges, and the regions with higher densities do not exhibit a lower proportion of wide (300-620au) relative to close (62-300au) binaries as might be expected from the preferential destruction of wider pairs. Only the closest (19-100au) separation range, which would be unaffected by dynamical processing, shows a possible difference in separation distributions between different regions. The combined set of young binaries, however, shows a distinct difference when compared to field binaries, with a significant excess of close (19-100au) systems among the younger binaries. Based on both the similarities and differences between individual regions, and between all seven young regions and the field, especially over separation ranges too close to be modified by dynamical processing, we conclude that multiple star formation is not universal and, by extension, the star formation process is not universal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2636-2646
Number of pages11
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume427
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2012

Fingerprint

star formation
stars
distribution
destruction
proportion
young

Keywords

  • Binaries: general
  • Open clusters and associations: general
  • Stars: formation
  • Stars: kinematics and dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

Testing the universality of star formation - II. Comparing separation distributions of nearby star-forming regions and the field. / King, Robert R.; Goodwin, Simon P.; Parker, Richard J.; Patience, Jennifer.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 427, No. 3, 11.12.2012, p. 2636-2646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7007e2f0d094a48bcefbbd42ccb8311,
title = "Testing the universality of star formation - II. Comparing separation distributions of nearby star-forming regions and the field",
abstract = "We have measured the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions of seven young star-forming regions using a uniform sample of young binaries. Both the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions are similar in the different regions. A tentative decline in the multiplicity fraction with increasing stellar density is apparent, even for binary systems with separations too close (19-100au) to have been dynamically processed. The separation distributions in the different regions are statistically indistinguishable over most separation ranges, and the regions with higher densities do not exhibit a lower proportion of wide (300-620au) relative to close (62-300au) binaries as might be expected from the preferential destruction of wider pairs. Only the closest (19-100au) separation range, which would be unaffected by dynamical processing, shows a possible difference in separation distributions between different regions. The combined set of young binaries, however, shows a distinct difference when compared to field binaries, with a significant excess of close (19-100au) systems among the younger binaries. Based on both the similarities and differences between individual regions, and between all seven young regions and the field, especially over separation ranges too close to be modified by dynamical processing, we conclude that multiple star formation is not universal and, by extension, the star formation process is not universal.",
keywords = "Binaries: general, Open clusters and associations: general, Stars: formation, Stars: kinematics and dynamics",
author = "King, {Robert R.} and Goodwin, {Simon P.} and Parker, {Richard J.} and Jennifer Patience",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22108.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "427",
pages = "2636--2646",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the universality of star formation - II. Comparing separation distributions of nearby star-forming regions and the field

AU - King, Robert R.

AU - Goodwin, Simon P.

AU - Parker, Richard J.

AU - Patience, Jennifer

PY - 2012/12/11

Y1 - 2012/12/11

N2 - We have measured the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions of seven young star-forming regions using a uniform sample of young binaries. Both the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions are similar in the different regions. A tentative decline in the multiplicity fraction with increasing stellar density is apparent, even for binary systems with separations too close (19-100au) to have been dynamically processed. The separation distributions in the different regions are statistically indistinguishable over most separation ranges, and the regions with higher densities do not exhibit a lower proportion of wide (300-620au) relative to close (62-300au) binaries as might be expected from the preferential destruction of wider pairs. Only the closest (19-100au) separation range, which would be unaffected by dynamical processing, shows a possible difference in separation distributions between different regions. The combined set of young binaries, however, shows a distinct difference when compared to field binaries, with a significant excess of close (19-100au) systems among the younger binaries. Based on both the similarities and differences between individual regions, and between all seven young regions and the field, especially over separation ranges too close to be modified by dynamical processing, we conclude that multiple star formation is not universal and, by extension, the star formation process is not universal.

AB - We have measured the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions of seven young star-forming regions using a uniform sample of young binaries. Both the multiplicity fractions and separation distributions are similar in the different regions. A tentative decline in the multiplicity fraction with increasing stellar density is apparent, even for binary systems with separations too close (19-100au) to have been dynamically processed. The separation distributions in the different regions are statistically indistinguishable over most separation ranges, and the regions with higher densities do not exhibit a lower proportion of wide (300-620au) relative to close (62-300au) binaries as might be expected from the preferential destruction of wider pairs. Only the closest (19-100au) separation range, which would be unaffected by dynamical processing, shows a possible difference in separation distributions between different regions. The combined set of young binaries, however, shows a distinct difference when compared to field binaries, with a significant excess of close (19-100au) systems among the younger binaries. Based on both the similarities and differences between individual regions, and between all seven young regions and the field, especially over separation ranges too close to be modified by dynamical processing, we conclude that multiple star formation is not universal and, by extension, the star formation process is not universal.

KW - Binaries: general

KW - Open clusters and associations: general

KW - Stars: formation

KW - Stars: kinematics and dynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869758106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869758106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22108.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22108.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84869758106

VL - 427

SP - 2636

EP - 2646

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 3

ER -