TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematically Incorporating Environmental Objectives into Shale Gas Pipeline Development
T2 - A Binary Integer, Multiobjective Spatial Optimization Model
AU - Kroetz, Kailin
AU - Shih, Jhih Shyang
AU - Siikamäki, Juha V.
AU - Marianov, Vladimir
AU - Krupnick, Alan
AU - Chu, Ziyan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Stephen D. Bechtel Foundation, Jr. Foundation for R.F.F.'s work on a range of issues related to shale gas development, including this research. Marianov acknowledges support from the Complex Engineering Systems Institute through grant CONICYT PIA FB0816 and grant FONDECYT 1160025. The authors thank Paul Armsworth, Michael Griffin, and Jan Mares for helpful insight and feedback and Matthew Ashenfarb, Jessica Blakely, Isabel Echarte, and Justine Huetteman for research assistance. The authors also thank anonymous shale gas industry stakeholders for sharing their insights on pipeline construction cost determinants.
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Stephen D. Bechtel Foundation, Jr. Foundation for R.F.F.’s work on a range of issues related to shale gas development, including this research. Marianov acknowledges support from the Complex Engineering Systems Institute through grant CONICYT PIA FB0816 and grant FONDECYT 1160025. The authors thank Paul Armsworth, Michael Griffin, and Jan Mares for helpful insight and feedback and Matthew Ashenfarb, Jessica Blakely, Isabel Echarte, and Justine Huetteman for research assistance. The authors also thank anonymous shale gas industry stakeholders for sharing their insights on pipeline construction cost determinants.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2019/6/18
Y1 - 2019/6/18
N2 - Shale gas pipeline development can have negative environmental impacts, including adverse effects on species and ecosystems through habitat degradation and loss. From a societal perspective, pipeline development planning processes should account for such externalities. We develop a multiobjective binary integer-programming model, called the Multi Objective Pipeline Siting (MOPS) model, to incorporate habitat externalities into pipeline development and to estimate the trade-offs between pipeline development costs and habitat impacts. We demonstrate the utility of the model using an application from Bradford and Susquehanna counties in northeastern Pennsylvania. We find that significant habitat impacts can be avoided for relatively low cost, but the avoidance of the additional habitat impacts becomes gradually and increasingly costly. For example, 10% of the habitat impacts can be avoided at less than a two percent pipeline cost increase relative to a configuration that ignores habitat impacts. MOPS or a similar model could be integrated into the pipeline siting and permitting process so oil and gas companies, communities, and states can identify cost-effective options for habitat conservation near shale gas development.
AB - Shale gas pipeline development can have negative environmental impacts, including adverse effects on species and ecosystems through habitat degradation and loss. From a societal perspective, pipeline development planning processes should account for such externalities. We develop a multiobjective binary integer-programming model, called the Multi Objective Pipeline Siting (MOPS) model, to incorporate habitat externalities into pipeline development and to estimate the trade-offs between pipeline development costs and habitat impacts. We demonstrate the utility of the model using an application from Bradford and Susquehanna counties in northeastern Pennsylvania. We find that significant habitat impacts can be avoided for relatively low cost, but the avoidance of the additional habitat impacts becomes gradually and increasingly costly. For example, 10% of the habitat impacts can be avoided at less than a two percent pipeline cost increase relative to a configuration that ignores habitat impacts. MOPS or a similar model could be integrated into the pipeline siting and permitting process so oil and gas companies, communities, and states can identify cost-effective options for habitat conservation near shale gas development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067513094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067513094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.9b01583
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.9b01583
M3 - Article
C2 - 31050415
AN - SCOPUS:85067513094
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 53
SP - 7155
EP - 7162
JO - Environmental Science & Technology
JF - Environmental Science & Technology
IS - 12
ER -