Sustaining the useful life of network governance

Life cycles and developmental challenges

Mark T. Imperial, Erik Johnston, Melinda Pruett-Jones, Kirsten Leong, Jennifer Thomsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Governance networks in large-scale landscape conservation are constantly changing as their constituent programs are created, are reconfigured, or cease to exist. Here, a four-stage life-cycle model is used to outline the challenges that network members face in designing healthy and useful governance processes, and a short description of the evolution of the Chicago Wilderness alliance helps to illustrate the dynamic nature of network governance. We deliberately use the concept of a "healthy and useful life" in place of more traditional measures of success because it highlights the constant nurturing that network processes require. The concept also draws attention to the fact that governance networks are a functional enterprise - even though they eventually come to the end of a life cycle, they most likely served useful functions while in operation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-144
Number of pages10
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

governance
life cycle (organisms)
life cycle
wilderness
landscape management
developmental stages
landscape conservation
programme

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Sustaining the useful life of network governance : Life cycles and developmental challenges. / Imperial, Mark T.; Johnston, Erik; Pruett-Jones, Melinda; Leong, Kirsten; Thomsen, Jennifer.

In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.04.2016, p. 135-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Imperial, Mark T. ; Johnston, Erik ; Pruett-Jones, Melinda ; Leong, Kirsten ; Thomsen, Jennifer. / Sustaining the useful life of network governance : Life cycles and developmental challenges. In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2016 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 135-144.
@article{34983c8f4e15441ab84723f05d9dcbd4,
title = "Sustaining the useful life of network governance: Life cycles and developmental challenges",
abstract = "Governance networks in large-scale landscape conservation are constantly changing as their constituent programs are created, are reconfigured, or cease to exist. Here, a four-stage life-cycle model is used to outline the challenges that network members face in designing healthy and useful governance processes, and a short description of the evolution of the Chicago Wilderness alliance helps to illustrate the dynamic nature of network governance. We deliberately use the concept of a {"}healthy and useful life{"} in place of more traditional measures of success because it highlights the constant nurturing that network processes require. The concept also draws attention to the fact that governance networks are a functional enterprise - even though they eventually come to the end of a life cycle, they most likely served useful functions while in operation.",
author = "Imperial, {Mark T.} and Erik Johnston and Melinda Pruett-Jones and Kirsten Leong and Jennifer Thomsen",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/fee.1249",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "135--144",
journal = "Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment",
issn = "1540-9295",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustaining the useful life of network governance

T2 - Life cycles and developmental challenges

AU - Imperial, Mark T.

AU - Johnston, Erik

AU - Pruett-Jones, Melinda

AU - Leong, Kirsten

AU - Thomsen, Jennifer

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Governance networks in large-scale landscape conservation are constantly changing as their constituent programs are created, are reconfigured, or cease to exist. Here, a four-stage life-cycle model is used to outline the challenges that network members face in designing healthy and useful governance processes, and a short description of the evolution of the Chicago Wilderness alliance helps to illustrate the dynamic nature of network governance. We deliberately use the concept of a "healthy and useful life" in place of more traditional measures of success because it highlights the constant nurturing that network processes require. The concept also draws attention to the fact that governance networks are a functional enterprise - even though they eventually come to the end of a life cycle, they most likely served useful functions while in operation.

AB - Governance networks in large-scale landscape conservation are constantly changing as their constituent programs are created, are reconfigured, or cease to exist. Here, a four-stage life-cycle model is used to outline the challenges that network members face in designing healthy and useful governance processes, and a short description of the evolution of the Chicago Wilderness alliance helps to illustrate the dynamic nature of network governance. We deliberately use the concept of a "healthy and useful life" in place of more traditional measures of success because it highlights the constant nurturing that network processes require. The concept also draws attention to the fact that governance networks are a functional enterprise - even though they eventually come to the end of a life cycle, they most likely served useful functions while in operation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962158393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962158393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/fee.1249

DO - 10.1002/fee.1249

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 135

EP - 144

JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

SN - 1540-9295

IS - 3

ER -