Student Evaluations of Instructor Immediacy and Sexually Harassing Behaviors: An Experimental Investigation

Paul Mongeau, Jennifer Blalock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Instructor immediacy and some instances of academic sexual harassment involve similar behaviors, yet have quite different consequences. This report describes two studies that investigate how college students evaluate descriptions of instructor immediacy behaviors and descriptions of sexually harassing behaviors. Data from both studies indicate that, first, harassment descriptions are considered much less appropriate than immediacy descriptions. Second, females tend to make more extreme judgments than do males. Finally, the number of harassment descriptions influences ratings of the behaviors themselves and of the instructor who enacts them. The data suggest that the interpretation of potentially harassing behaviors in some cases is a dynamic, interactive, relational process. The data also suggest that the behavior with the greatest potential for misinterpretation is teacher-student touch.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-272
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Applied Communication Research
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

instructor
Students
evaluation
student
sexual harassment
student teacher
Instructor
Evaluation
Immediacy
rating
interpretation
Harassment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication

Cite this

Student Evaluations of Instructor Immediacy and Sexually Harassing Behaviors : An Experimental Investigation. / Mongeau, Paul; Blalock, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.08.1994, p. 256-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c51cbb9854c14c5a87ecb2d08ddfe552,
title = "Student Evaluations of Instructor Immediacy and Sexually Harassing Behaviors: An Experimental Investigation",
abstract = "Instructor immediacy and some instances of academic sexual harassment involve similar behaviors, yet have quite different consequences. This report describes two studies that investigate how college students evaluate descriptions of instructor immediacy behaviors and descriptions of sexually harassing behaviors. Data from both studies indicate that, first, harassment descriptions are considered much less appropriate than immediacy descriptions. Second, females tend to make more extreme judgments than do males. Finally, the number of harassment descriptions influences ratings of the behaviors themselves and of the instructor who enacts them. The data suggest that the interpretation of potentially harassing behaviors in some cases is a dynamic, interactive, relational process. The data also suggest that the behavior with the greatest potential for misinterpretation is teacher-student touch.",
author = "Paul Mongeau and Jennifer Blalock",
year = "1994",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00909889409365401",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "256--272",
journal = "Journal of Applied Communication Research",
issn = "0090-9882",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student Evaluations of Instructor Immediacy and Sexually Harassing Behaviors

T2 - An Experimental Investigation

AU - Mongeau, Paul

AU - Blalock, Jennifer

PY - 1994/8/1

Y1 - 1994/8/1

N2 - Instructor immediacy and some instances of academic sexual harassment involve similar behaviors, yet have quite different consequences. This report describes two studies that investigate how college students evaluate descriptions of instructor immediacy behaviors and descriptions of sexually harassing behaviors. Data from both studies indicate that, first, harassment descriptions are considered much less appropriate than immediacy descriptions. Second, females tend to make more extreme judgments than do males. Finally, the number of harassment descriptions influences ratings of the behaviors themselves and of the instructor who enacts them. The data suggest that the interpretation of potentially harassing behaviors in some cases is a dynamic, interactive, relational process. The data also suggest that the behavior with the greatest potential for misinterpretation is teacher-student touch.

AB - Instructor immediacy and some instances of academic sexual harassment involve similar behaviors, yet have quite different consequences. This report describes two studies that investigate how college students evaluate descriptions of instructor immediacy behaviors and descriptions of sexually harassing behaviors. Data from both studies indicate that, first, harassment descriptions are considered much less appropriate than immediacy descriptions. Second, females tend to make more extreme judgments than do males. Finally, the number of harassment descriptions influences ratings of the behaviors themselves and of the instructor who enacts them. The data suggest that the interpretation of potentially harassing behaviors in some cases is a dynamic, interactive, relational process. The data also suggest that the behavior with the greatest potential for misinterpretation is teacher-student touch.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011352214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011352214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00909889409365401

DO - 10.1080/00909889409365401

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011352214

VL - 22

SP - 256

EP - 272

JO - Journal of Applied Communication Research

JF - Journal of Applied Communication Research

SN - 0090-9882

IS - 3

ER -