Stratification and spatial segregation of human capital as determinants of metropolitan productivity in the United States

Jose Lobo, David P. Smole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics of how the human capital embodied in metropolitan populations might impact metropolitan productivity. Three aspects of human capital are examined: the average aggregate level of human capital, stratification according to human capital and spatial segregation according to human capital. These are measured for the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the US for 1970, 1980 and 1990, and then tested as explanatory variables of metropolitan productivity. Econometric analysis confirms a strong relationship between higher average levels of human capital and higher productivity and growth. Stratification appears negatively correlated with productivity in 1970 and 1980, but positively correlated in 1990. Segregation appears negatively correlated with productivity in the 1970s, and in 1990 when controlling for stratification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-547
Number of pages19
JournalUrban Studies
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

human capital
segregation
stratification
productivity
determinants
metropolitan population
econometrics
metropolitan area
agglomeration area

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Stratification and spatial segregation of human capital as determinants of metropolitan productivity in the United States. / Lobo, Jose; Smole, David P.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 529-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{593e3e1b21e04a2bb93006babcb641b4,
title = "Stratification and spatial segregation of human capital as determinants of metropolitan productivity in the United States",
abstract = "This paper explores the dynamics of how the human capital embodied in metropolitan populations might impact metropolitan productivity. Three aspects of human capital are examined: the average aggregate level of human capital, stratification according to human capital and spatial segregation according to human capital. These are measured for the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the US for 1970, 1980 and 1990, and then tested as explanatory variables of metropolitan productivity. Econometric analysis confirms a strong relationship between higher average levels of human capital and higher productivity and growth. Stratification appears negatively correlated with productivity in 1970 and 1980, but positively correlated in 1990. Segregation appears negatively correlated with productivity in the 1970s, and in 1990 when controlling for stratification.",
author = "Jose Lobo and Smole, {David P.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00420980220112810",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "529--547",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stratification and spatial segregation of human capital as determinants of metropolitan productivity in the United States

AU - Lobo, Jose

AU - Smole, David P.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - This paper explores the dynamics of how the human capital embodied in metropolitan populations might impact metropolitan productivity. Three aspects of human capital are examined: the average aggregate level of human capital, stratification according to human capital and spatial segregation according to human capital. These are measured for the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the US for 1970, 1980 and 1990, and then tested as explanatory variables of metropolitan productivity. Econometric analysis confirms a strong relationship between higher average levels of human capital and higher productivity and growth. Stratification appears negatively correlated with productivity in 1970 and 1980, but positively correlated in 1990. Segregation appears negatively correlated with productivity in the 1970s, and in 1990 when controlling for stratification.

AB - This paper explores the dynamics of how the human capital embodied in metropolitan populations might impact metropolitan productivity. Three aspects of human capital are examined: the average aggregate level of human capital, stratification according to human capital and spatial segregation according to human capital. These are measured for the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the US for 1970, 1980 and 1990, and then tested as explanatory variables of metropolitan productivity. Econometric analysis confirms a strong relationship between higher average levels of human capital and higher productivity and growth. Stratification appears negatively correlated with productivity in 1970 and 1980, but positively correlated in 1990. Segregation appears negatively correlated with productivity in the 1970s, and in 1990 when controlling for stratification.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036192084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036192084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00420980220112810

DO - 10.1080/00420980220112810

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036192084

VL - 39

SP - 529

EP - 547

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 3

ER -