State-of-the-art practices in farmland biodiversity monitoring for North America and Europe

Felix Herzog, Janet Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policy makers and farmers need to know the status of farmland biodiversity in order to meet conservation goals and evaluate management options. Based on a review of 11 monitoringprograms in Europe and North America and on related literature, we identify the design choices or attributes of a program that balance monitoring costs and usefulness for stakeholders. A useful program monitors habitats, vascular plants, and possibly faunal groups (ecosystem service providers, charismatic species) using a stratified random sample of the agricultural landscape, including marginal and intensive regions. The size of landscape samples varies with the grain of the agricultural landscape; for example, samples are smaller in Europe and larger in North America. Raw data are collected in a rolling survey, which distributes sampling over several years. Sufficient practical experience is now available to implement broad monitoring schemes on both continents. Technological developments in remote sensing, metagenomics, and social media may offer new opportunities for affordable farmland biodiversity monitoring and help to lower the overall costs of monitoring programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalAmbio
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 22 2016

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
biodiversity
agricultural land
monitoring
agricultural landscape
Monitoring
technological development
technical development
costs
social media
vascular plant
cost
ecosystem service
Ecosystems
random sample
service provider
habitat
agricultural product
Costs
Remote sensing

Keywords

  • Agricultural landscape
  • Ecosystem service
  • Essential biodiversity variables
  • Monitoring budget
  • Stakeholder need
  • Survey design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

State-of-the-art practices in farmland biodiversity monitoring for North America and Europe. / Herzog, Felix; Franklin, Janet.

In: Ambio, 22.06.2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b44314cf76f4736a2a0b99443464a6f,
title = "State-of-the-art practices in farmland biodiversity monitoring for North America and Europe",
abstract = "Policy makers and farmers need to know the status of farmland biodiversity in order to meet conservation goals and evaluate management options. Based on a review of 11 monitoringprograms in Europe and North America and on related literature, we identify the design choices or attributes of a program that balance monitoring costs and usefulness for stakeholders. A useful program monitors habitats, vascular plants, and possibly faunal groups (ecosystem service providers, charismatic species) using a stratified random sample of the agricultural landscape, including marginal and intensive regions. The size of landscape samples varies with the grain of the agricultural landscape; for example, samples are smaller in Europe and larger in North America. Raw data are collected in a rolling survey, which distributes sampling over several years. Sufficient practical experience is now available to implement broad monitoring schemes on both continents. Technological developments in remote sensing, metagenomics, and social media may offer new opportunities for affordable farmland biodiversity monitoring and help to lower the overall costs of monitoring programs.",
keywords = "Agricultural landscape, Ecosystem service, Essential biodiversity variables, Monitoring budget, Stakeholder need, Survey design",
author = "Felix Herzog and Janet Franklin",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1007/s13280-016-0799-0",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State-of-the-art practices in farmland biodiversity monitoring for North America and Europe

AU - Herzog, Felix

AU - Franklin, Janet

PY - 2016/6/22

Y1 - 2016/6/22

N2 - Policy makers and farmers need to know the status of farmland biodiversity in order to meet conservation goals and evaluate management options. Based on a review of 11 monitoringprograms in Europe and North America and on related literature, we identify the design choices or attributes of a program that balance monitoring costs and usefulness for stakeholders. A useful program monitors habitats, vascular plants, and possibly faunal groups (ecosystem service providers, charismatic species) using a stratified random sample of the agricultural landscape, including marginal and intensive regions. The size of landscape samples varies with the grain of the agricultural landscape; for example, samples are smaller in Europe and larger in North America. Raw data are collected in a rolling survey, which distributes sampling over several years. Sufficient practical experience is now available to implement broad monitoring schemes on both continents. Technological developments in remote sensing, metagenomics, and social media may offer new opportunities for affordable farmland biodiversity monitoring and help to lower the overall costs of monitoring programs.

AB - Policy makers and farmers need to know the status of farmland biodiversity in order to meet conservation goals and evaluate management options. Based on a review of 11 monitoringprograms in Europe and North America and on related literature, we identify the design choices or attributes of a program that balance monitoring costs and usefulness for stakeholders. A useful program monitors habitats, vascular plants, and possibly faunal groups (ecosystem service providers, charismatic species) using a stratified random sample of the agricultural landscape, including marginal and intensive regions. The size of landscape samples varies with the grain of the agricultural landscape; for example, samples are smaller in Europe and larger in North America. Raw data are collected in a rolling survey, which distributes sampling over several years. Sufficient practical experience is now available to implement broad monitoring schemes on both continents. Technological developments in remote sensing, metagenomics, and social media may offer new opportunities for affordable farmland biodiversity monitoring and help to lower the overall costs of monitoring programs.

KW - Agricultural landscape

KW - Ecosystem service

KW - Essential biodiversity variables

KW - Monitoring budget

KW - Stakeholder need

KW - Survey design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975461467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975461467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-016-0799-0

DO - 10.1007/s13280-016-0799-0

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

ER -