Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency

Gabriel J. Mazur, Federico Sanabria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments used a spatial serial conditioning paradigm to assess the effectiveness of spatially informative conditioned stimuli in eliciting tracking behavior in pigeons. The experimental paradigm consisted of the simultaneous presentation of 2 key lights (CS2 and CTRL), followed by another key light (CS1), followed by food (the unconditioned stimulus or US). CS2 and CTRL were presented in 2 of 3 possible locations, randomly assigned; CS1 was always presented in the same location as CS2. CS2 was designed to signal the spatial, but not the temporal locus of CS1; CS1 signaled the temporal locus of the US. In experiment 1, differential pecking on CS2 was observed even when CS2 was present throughout the interval between consecutive presentations of CS1, but only in a minority of pigeons; prevalence of differential pecking was enhanced when CS2 duration was halved. A control condition verified that pecking on CS2 was not due to temporal proximity between CS2 and US. Experiment 2 demonstrated the reversibility of spatial conditioning between CS2 and CTRL. Asymptotic performance never involved tracking CTRL more than CS2 for any of 16 pigeons. It is inferred that pigeons learned the spatial association between CS2 and CS1, and that temporal contingency facilitated its expression as tracking behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-141
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Columbidae
conditioned behavior
pigeons
pecking
Light
loci
Food
duration
Conditioning (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Associative processes
  • Autoshaping
  • Classical conditioning
  • Pigeons
  • Serial conditioning
  • Spatial learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency. / Mazur, Gabriel J.; Sanabria, Federico.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 87, No. 1, 05.2011, p. 135-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48d9fd5df7144925888cb7002d40cb5b,
title = "Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency",
abstract = "Two experiments used a spatial serial conditioning paradigm to assess the effectiveness of spatially informative conditioned stimuli in eliciting tracking behavior in pigeons. The experimental paradigm consisted of the simultaneous presentation of 2 key lights (CS2 and CTRL), followed by another key light (CS1), followed by food (the unconditioned stimulus or US). CS2 and CTRL were presented in 2 of 3 possible locations, randomly assigned; CS1 was always presented in the same location as CS2. CS2 was designed to signal the spatial, but not the temporal locus of CS1; CS1 signaled the temporal locus of the US. In experiment 1, differential pecking on CS2 was observed even when CS2 was present throughout the interval between consecutive presentations of CS1, but only in a minority of pigeons; prevalence of differential pecking was enhanced when CS2 duration was halved. A control condition verified that pecking on CS2 was not due to temporal proximity between CS2 and US. Experiment 2 demonstrated the reversibility of spatial conditioning between CS2 and CTRL. Asymptotic performance never involved tracking CTRL more than CS2 for any of 16 pigeons. It is inferred that pigeons learned the spatial association between CS2 and CS1, and that temporal contingency facilitated its expression as tracking behavior.",
keywords = "Associative processes, Autoshaping, Classical conditioning, Pigeons, Serial conditioning, Spatial learning",
author = "Mazur, {Gabriel J.} and Federico Sanabria",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "135--141",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency

AU - Mazur, Gabriel J.

AU - Sanabria, Federico

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Two experiments used a spatial serial conditioning paradigm to assess the effectiveness of spatially informative conditioned stimuli in eliciting tracking behavior in pigeons. The experimental paradigm consisted of the simultaneous presentation of 2 key lights (CS2 and CTRL), followed by another key light (CS1), followed by food (the unconditioned stimulus or US). CS2 and CTRL were presented in 2 of 3 possible locations, randomly assigned; CS1 was always presented in the same location as CS2. CS2 was designed to signal the spatial, but not the temporal locus of CS1; CS1 signaled the temporal locus of the US. In experiment 1, differential pecking on CS2 was observed even when CS2 was present throughout the interval between consecutive presentations of CS1, but only in a minority of pigeons; prevalence of differential pecking was enhanced when CS2 duration was halved. A control condition verified that pecking on CS2 was not due to temporal proximity between CS2 and US. Experiment 2 demonstrated the reversibility of spatial conditioning between CS2 and CTRL. Asymptotic performance never involved tracking CTRL more than CS2 for any of 16 pigeons. It is inferred that pigeons learned the spatial association between CS2 and CS1, and that temporal contingency facilitated its expression as tracking behavior.

AB - Two experiments used a spatial serial conditioning paradigm to assess the effectiveness of spatially informative conditioned stimuli in eliciting tracking behavior in pigeons. The experimental paradigm consisted of the simultaneous presentation of 2 key lights (CS2 and CTRL), followed by another key light (CS1), followed by food (the unconditioned stimulus or US). CS2 and CTRL were presented in 2 of 3 possible locations, randomly assigned; CS1 was always presented in the same location as CS2. CS2 was designed to signal the spatial, but not the temporal locus of CS1; CS1 signaled the temporal locus of the US. In experiment 1, differential pecking on CS2 was observed even when CS2 was present throughout the interval between consecutive presentations of CS1, but only in a minority of pigeons; prevalence of differential pecking was enhanced when CS2 duration was halved. A control condition verified that pecking on CS2 was not due to temporal proximity between CS2 and US. Experiment 2 demonstrated the reversibility of spatial conditioning between CS2 and CTRL. Asymptotic performance never involved tracking CTRL more than CS2 for any of 16 pigeons. It is inferred that pigeons learned the spatial association between CS2 and CS1, and that temporal contingency facilitated its expression as tracking behavior.

KW - Associative processes

KW - Autoshaping

KW - Classical conditioning

KW - Pigeons

KW - Serial conditioning

KW - Spatial learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954867261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954867261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 21238551

AN - SCOPUS:79954867261

VL - 87

SP - 135

EP - 141

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 1

ER -