Source of feedback, observational learning, and attitude change

Frederick H. Kanfer, Paul Karoly, Alexander Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conducted 2 studies on the differential effects of self-attributed vs other-attributed feedback on observational learning and attractiveness ratings of pictures. In Exp I, 60 male undergraduates were shown slides of girls' faces and presented with scores allegedly reflecting their own emotional reactions to the girls' physical attractiveness (self group) or the reactions of another S (other group). Both recall and preference were affected by the alleged feedback source. The self group showed the best recall and greatest influence on preference; the control group showed the poorest recall and least influence. In Exp II, 80 Ss underwent a similar procedure, except that feedback was attributed to self, a similar or different other, or random events. Preranking permitted replication with feedback that was highly discrepant or not discrepant from Ss' rankings. Recall was affected by feedback source and discrepancy magnitude, as was preference change. Results support the hypotheses on the effects of source of feedback derived from an observational learning model. Data suggest the utility of social learning theory in conceptualizing the effects of self vs other as due to component dimensions rather than to a dichotomous distinction. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-38
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1974
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

attitude change
learning
social attraction
Group
Learning
social learning
learning theory
Formative Feedback
ranking
rating
Control Groups
event

Keywords

  • attractiveness ratings of pictures, male college students
  • self vs other-attributed feedback, observational learning &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Source of feedback, observational learning, and attitude change. / Kanfer, Frederick H.; Karoly, Paul; Newman, Alexander.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.1974, p. 30-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kanfer, Frederick H. ; Karoly, Paul ; Newman, Alexander. / Source of feedback, observational learning, and attitude change. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 30-38.
@article{2db7e72ac53e41b6926355440f189988,
title = "Source of feedback, observational learning, and attitude change",
abstract = "Conducted 2 studies on the differential effects of self-attributed vs other-attributed feedback on observational learning and attractiveness ratings of pictures. In Exp I, 60 male undergraduates were shown slides of girls' faces and presented with scores allegedly reflecting their own emotional reactions to the girls' physical attractiveness (self group) or the reactions of another S (other group). Both recall and preference were affected by the alleged feedback source. The self group showed the best recall and greatest influence on preference; the control group showed the poorest recall and least influence. In Exp II, 80 Ss underwent a similar procedure, except that feedback was attributed to self, a similar or different other, or random events. Preranking permitted replication with feedback that was highly discrepant or not discrepant from Ss' rankings. Recall was affected by feedback source and discrepancy magnitude, as was preference change. Results support the hypotheses on the effects of source of feedback derived from an observational learning model. Data suggest the utility of social learning theory in conceptualizing the effects of self vs other as due to component dimensions rather than to a dichotomous distinction. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "attractiveness ratings of pictures, male college students, self vs other-attributed feedback, observational learning &",
author = "Kanfer, {Frederick H.} and Paul Karoly and Alexander Newman",
year = "1974",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/h0035676",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "30--38",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Source of feedback, observational learning, and attitude change

AU - Kanfer, Frederick H.

AU - Karoly, Paul

AU - Newman, Alexander

PY - 1974/1

Y1 - 1974/1

N2 - Conducted 2 studies on the differential effects of self-attributed vs other-attributed feedback on observational learning and attractiveness ratings of pictures. In Exp I, 60 male undergraduates were shown slides of girls' faces and presented with scores allegedly reflecting their own emotional reactions to the girls' physical attractiveness (self group) or the reactions of another S (other group). Both recall and preference were affected by the alleged feedback source. The self group showed the best recall and greatest influence on preference; the control group showed the poorest recall and least influence. In Exp II, 80 Ss underwent a similar procedure, except that feedback was attributed to self, a similar or different other, or random events. Preranking permitted replication with feedback that was highly discrepant or not discrepant from Ss' rankings. Recall was affected by feedback source and discrepancy magnitude, as was preference change. Results support the hypotheses on the effects of source of feedback derived from an observational learning model. Data suggest the utility of social learning theory in conceptualizing the effects of self vs other as due to component dimensions rather than to a dichotomous distinction. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Conducted 2 studies on the differential effects of self-attributed vs other-attributed feedback on observational learning and attractiveness ratings of pictures. In Exp I, 60 male undergraduates were shown slides of girls' faces and presented with scores allegedly reflecting their own emotional reactions to the girls' physical attractiveness (self group) or the reactions of another S (other group). Both recall and preference were affected by the alleged feedback source. The self group showed the best recall and greatest influence on preference; the control group showed the poorest recall and least influence. In Exp II, 80 Ss underwent a similar procedure, except that feedback was attributed to self, a similar or different other, or random events. Preranking permitted replication with feedback that was highly discrepant or not discrepant from Ss' rankings. Recall was affected by feedback source and discrepancy magnitude, as was preference change. Results support the hypotheses on the effects of source of feedback derived from an observational learning model. Data suggest the utility of social learning theory in conceptualizing the effects of self vs other as due to component dimensions rather than to a dichotomous distinction. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - attractiveness ratings of pictures, male college students

KW - self vs other-attributed feedback, observational learning &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009226538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009226538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0035676

DO - 10.1037/h0035676

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0009226538

VL - 29

SP - 30

EP - 38

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 1

ER -