Some Truths Don’t Matter: The Case of Strong Sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


The proponents of strong sustainability have advanced four main arguments for the non-substitutability of natural capital: the existence argument, the Aristotelian argument, the motivation argument, and the argument from critical natural capital. This paper argues that the first three arguments fail while the fourth cannot be properly assessed without clarifying the notion of critical natural capital. To that end, this paper develops a specific account of critical natural capital as ecological conditions required for the continued existence of economic agents. This improved argument establishes that strong sustainability is probably true, but it also reveals that it may not matter for the purpose of public policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-196
Number of pages13
JournalEthics, Policy and Environment
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 4 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Philosophy
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Some Truths Don’t Matter: The Case of Strong Sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this