Some Truths Don’t Matter

The Case of Strong Sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The proponents of strong sustainability have advanced four main arguments for the non-substitutability of natural capital: the existence argument, the Aristotelian argument, the motivation argument, and the argument from critical natural capital. This paper argues that the first three arguments fail while the fourth cannot be properly assessed without clarifying the notion of critical natural capital. To that end, this paper develops a specific account of critical natural capital as ecological conditions required for the continued existence of economic agents. This improved argument establishes that strong sustainability is probably true, but it also reveals that it may not matter for the purpose of public policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEthics, Policy and Environment
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

natural capital
sustainability
public policy
Sustainability
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Philosophy
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Some Truths Don’t Matter : The Case of Strong Sustainability. / DesRoches, Tyler.

In: Ethics, Policy and Environment, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{344b623ab3064e4ea9524b9cfef452b6,
title = "Some Truths Don’t Matter: The Case of Strong Sustainability",
abstract = "The proponents of strong sustainability have advanced four main arguments for the non-substitutability of natural capital: the existence argument, the Aristotelian argument, the motivation argument, and the argument from critical natural capital. This paper argues that the first three arguments fail while the fourth cannot be properly assessed without clarifying the notion of critical natural capital. To that end, this paper develops a specific account of critical natural capital as ecological conditions required for the continued existence of economic agents. This improved argument establishes that strong sustainability is probably true, but it also reveals that it may not matter for the purpose of public policy.",
author = "Tyler DesRoches",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/21550085.2019.1625543",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Ethics, Policy and Environment",
issn = "2155-0085",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some Truths Don’t Matter

T2 - The Case of Strong Sustainability

AU - DesRoches, Tyler

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The proponents of strong sustainability have advanced four main arguments for the non-substitutability of natural capital: the existence argument, the Aristotelian argument, the motivation argument, and the argument from critical natural capital. This paper argues that the first three arguments fail while the fourth cannot be properly assessed without clarifying the notion of critical natural capital. To that end, this paper develops a specific account of critical natural capital as ecological conditions required for the continued existence of economic agents. This improved argument establishes that strong sustainability is probably true, but it also reveals that it may not matter for the purpose of public policy.

AB - The proponents of strong sustainability have advanced four main arguments for the non-substitutability of natural capital: the existence argument, the Aristotelian argument, the motivation argument, and the argument from critical natural capital. This paper argues that the first three arguments fail while the fourth cannot be properly assessed without clarifying the notion of critical natural capital. To that end, this paper develops a specific account of critical natural capital as ecological conditions required for the continued existence of economic agents. This improved argument establishes that strong sustainability is probably true, but it also reveals that it may not matter for the purpose of public policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067624930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067624930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21550085.2019.1625543

DO - 10.1080/21550085.2019.1625543

M3 - Article

JO - Ethics, Policy and Environment

JF - Ethics, Policy and Environment

SN - 2155-0085

ER -